U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 25, 2011 08:53 PM UTC

Gessler Backing Down?

  • 20 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

In a Denver newspaper story today by reporter Tim Hoover, embattled Secretary of State Scott Gessler appears to be giving in to the firestorm of criticism that erupted late last week, following his announcement that he intended to continue working part-time at his former law firm.

Gessler’s firm, the Hackstaff Law Group (previously Hackstaff Gessler) has a reputation as one of the most politically connected–and toxic–law firms in the state. While Gessler has asserted that he would not take on cases that pertain to any of the far-reaching responsibilities of the Secretary of State, we have yet to see a qualified observer agree that is practicable, or even verifiable. Moreover, as we discussed yesterday, that pervasive role in Colorado business makes it very difficult to imagine any employment for Secretary Gessler with a company doing business in Colorado where a conflict of interest would not at some point arise.

Well, according to Hoover, Gessler says today he would be willing to make a “full disclosure” of clients he represented on the side–while acknowledging that this may well make him unsuitable for the job from the perspective of those clients. Gessler says flat-out that he “may not be able to do this” now, and says if that’s the choice he’s faced with he’ll choose Secretary of State. It’s quite clear from the read of this article that the criticism of his decision–from partisan, bipartisan, and nonpartisan quarters alike–has tamped down his bravado from the initial coverage.

Which probably has something to do with the growing weight of negative coverage–today’s Denver newspaper has an editorial blasting Gessler, as well as a devastatingly funny column from Mike Littwin. The Grand Junction Sentinel (paywalled) also pans Gessler’s “disturbing” decision.

It’s beginning to look like Gessler will pull back from the brink, before this becomes something even worse than the enormous credibility hit for him it is presently. It’s not the way to introduce yourself ten days after taking office. Before fellow Republicans get too excited about all the wonderful ways Gessler can “help” them Gigi Dennis-style, they might want to consider the possibility that Gessler will bumble the whole thing into a self-inflicted earned media nightmare.

Because this is about as politically clueless as it gets.

Comments

20 thoughts on “Gessler Backing Down?

  1. Very well written and quite succinct about their reservations over this.

    I’d like to see Gessler choose not to work for his firm at all. If he goes that route, I’ll be thrilled. If he doesn’t, I’ll be worried for the next four years.  

  2. Now he’s not only clueless, but spineless. A good villain has at least some genuine entertainment value. A bumbling clown who WANTS to be a villain? Yawn.

  3. but am still disturbed that it took universal condemnation to bring that about.

    I said this election night and I’m saying it again: It’s gonna be a long 4 years!

      1. … what is up with people running for full time public jobs, where the salary is well known to be less than what they can make in the private sector, continuing to work in the private sector?

        1. reported by Sandra was that Stapleton has the potential to make $150,000 working for his old company in a “consulting” position–chicken scratch compared to the $490,000 he made last year though. But what was interesting was that his father, who will be taking over Stapleton’s duties as CEO, will be making $60,000. That’s less than Stapleton’s salary as State Treasurer.

        2. Two jobs can be better.

          i have six W2’s from 2010 (and a 1099 or two)   – and I would prefer all were larger, but do not want to give up any of them.

  4. If Gessler decides that having his named dragged through the mud by Progress Now and the evil Denvah Post is more costly than finding a nice teaching gig, I respect that.

    But let’s be clear about what this is. It’s a smear campaign based on theories and suppositions. And you’re really just upset that you lost the election.

    1. Between you and LB, ProgressNow is the talking point of the day.

      I see the strategy here.  Deflect.  Don’t talk about Gessler’s lack of ethics, kill the messenger instead.

      You think it’s a smear.  Fine.  Defend Gessler.  I dare you.  Just as I dared you in another thread.

      Let’s hear your defense.

    2. The only issues are whether the “other” job is a) a conflict and 2) becomes the first job and his elected office becomes the “other.”

      He should practice law – just not the kind of law where the SOS would have jurisdiction.

      Can you imagine if Erin Toll had become a real estate broker or a mortgage broker while she was the Director of the Division of real Estate?  Or how about if the Insurance Commissioner started his own insurance provider?

      I know- let’s appoint the SOS to run Pinnacol.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

115 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!