President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 10, 2011 02:12 AM UTC

At Least He's Not Your New Ex-Congressman

  • 62 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

As The Buffalo News reports:

Rep. Chris Lee, R-Amherst, resigned from Congress this afternoon after an Internet tabloid published a shirtless picture of him that the married congressman had sent to a Maryland woman on Craigslist.

Matthew Harakal, Lee’s spokesman, confirmed that he had resigned as of 5 p.m. today. Harakal said a statement would be forthcoming from Lee’s office…

The woman provided Gawker with a chain of e-mails in which someone using Lee’s Gmail address identified himself as a 39-year-old lobbyist and “a very fit fun classy guy.”

Lee is 46…

The author later identified himself as “divorced.” But according to the Gawker story, the woman then searched for Lee online and found that he was neither divorced nor a lobbyist — and then decided to forward the e-mails to Gawker.

In the Gawker story, a Lee spokesman said the congressman believed his private Gmail account had been hacked, and that Lee had informed his staff of the security breach on Jan. 21. But later in the day Harakal, the congressman’s spokesman, called The Buffalo News to say Lee had resigned.

Comments

62 thoughts on “At Least He’s Not Your New Ex-Congressman

  1. Er, I mean, bad ex-Congressman, no cushy position at an anti-abortion think tank for you!

    And, by “that good,” of course, I mean the equivalent appropriate to my gender. Not like THAT, exactly. Just equally fit. But with more common sense. And less scumbag.

    And when are we going to stop caring so much about what Congresspersons do in their marriages? This one happens to be a family values jackass, so it’s at least a tiny bit relevant to his political leanings, and it’s particularly funny, but he doesn’t really deserve to have to resign over this. It’s between him, his wife, and whoever convinced him that you should show your face in shirtless bathroom mirror photos.

    1. Maybe people won’t point out hypocrisy when it occurs.

      In the meantime, people will continue to care.  They particularly care when their elected representatives lie to them, as Lee did when he said his Gmail account had been hijacked.  At least he didn’t say the picture was photoshopped too.

      I don’t think anyone said he had to resign; that was his choice.

      1. Lying is pretty much par for the course when your boobs show up on the Internet, even if they’re man-boobs. Cassie did it, Haley from Paramore did it, so on and so forth. It’s in the script. But it ought to be deleted.

        “Yeah. I was cruising for women on Craigslist. I should have been smarter about the photos and I shouldn’t have lied about my age.” And back to business.

        It irks me when voters can’t be bothered to care that this guy wants to take away their basic human right to determine what they do with their own internal organs, but it’s a national scandal that he’s trolling for tail on the Web.

        Of course, the bright spot is that we get to update the classic joke:

        Q: Why does Chris Lee wear wool underwear?

        A: To keep his ankles warm.

    2. It’s really hard to convince people your Gmail account was hacked when the guy in the photo looks an awful lot like you.

      I had one date with a guy I met online, who said, among other things, that he was six feet tall. When we met, I looked him in the eye and thought, “It must be because I’m wearing boots,” but even in stocking feet, I was almost his height, and I’m 5’7″.

      Moral of Story: Don’t lie about something so easily fact-checked.

      1. I mean, there are definitely ways he could spin this and retain plausible deniability. It could be an angry ex-intern. But then why did the intern have the photo? Disgruntled personal trainer? Who made him send pictures of his torso regularly to prove he was making progress in his workouts?

        He could belabor the point, but it all seems to make him look worse in the end.

    3. I think the public will always care about what their reps do with their private lives.  In general we’d like to believe that our politicians are the best of us.  

      We’ll stop caring about a Mel Gibson rant before we stop caring about our politicians private lives.

    4. when GOP candidates make a major issue out of their superior family values, how important religion is to them, how opposed they are to homosexuality, how gays shouldn’t be allowed to serve openly in the military, blah,blah,blah. JFK may have been an obssessive skirt chaser but you never heard him carrying on about his moral superiority and superior Christian values.

      I personally love it when self righteous GOP adulterers and self loathing anti-gay voting GOP gays get outed.  They are the ones who put their version of superior family values and religious faith center stage. When they get caught in the spotlight they have nobody but themselves to blame. And the rest of us deserve a good chuckle at their expense.  

      1. Somehow I think in the age of 24 hour cable news, he’d have been run out of town on a rail, too. A little skirt-chasing (or pant-chasing/suit-chasing/whatever you call it) shouldn’t kill your career. Just your marriage, unless you have a very tolerant spouse. I’m more bothered by the obsession with politicians’ sex lives than I am by the hypocrisy; I think the abhorrent “family values” views themselves should  be enough to get someone voted out.

        1. but that’s another issue. Today’s wall to wall 24/7 media and thirst for the next scandal has erased the old world where the press helped the respected high ranking pols keep their secrets.  My point was that JFK wasn’t a hypocritical, self righteous blowhard.  

          1. But I see it the same way I see Abu Ghraib, on a much, much, MUCH smaller scale: Just ’cause  somebody’s a scumbag doesn’t mean that wrong things become right when they damage said scumbag. It’s wrong to make politicians’ private sexual choices an electoral issue, and I think my holding that opinion wouldn’t mean anything if I dropped it when the “victim” is a family-values Republican. Then I would feel like a hypocrite when, inevitably, I find myself verbosely defending the next woman who gets a media thrashing for (oh noes!) having had a sex life.

            1. Rs have made espousing superior Christian values a requirement for themselves and a bludgeon for attacking their supposedly not sufficiently good Christian opponents.  

              He who lives by the sword… etc. So I will continue to enjoy R hypocrites getting smoked by exposure of their own sleazy personal behavior.  When they promise to keep people’s personal sex lives and preferences out of it and stop parading  their allegedly superior Christian family values, then we can call a truce.  But even then, it won’t work.  

              The mass and social media being what it is now, it really isn’t realistic to expect a return to the era when anything was OK as long as you didn’t scare the horses.  The best we can do is agree not to care as long as you don’t use your moral superiority as a reason for supporting you. If you’re going to get up on your high horse, you’d better not give anyone the means of dragging you down because you will get dragged down. Count on it.

    1. I’m sure I should know this, but I haven’t been around Pols that long. Explain?

      (Great, now my coworkers are staring at me laughing my butt off at the screen)

        1. That’s amazing. I can’t believe I didn’t know about this before. OMG.

          Props to him for his very chill response.

          No props to society for the fact that the same photo of a woman would be a career-ender 🙁

            1. Though when she was running, I worked for a social networking site that had a user whose wife happened to have competed against her in the pageant, who shared some gown photos. She didn’t look too bad, but not fabulous.

              But think of the fuss over Michelle Obama showing her upper arms in her First Lady portrait. OH NO ARMS! How immoral!

  2. Via Taegan Goddard, here’s something Lee wrote for a local paper in 2009:

    Through the Internet, with a few keystrokes and the click of a button, a young person can call up information for a research project, make new friends or discover new hobbies. At the same time, responding to what may seem like a friendly e-mail or an appealing marketing offer can have serious consequences. Private information and images can so easily be transmitted to friends and strangers alike.”

    Wise advice!

  3. .

    He probably had politico junkies throwing themselves at him.  Women in their mid-20’s, I’m guessing.  Men, too.  He’s the equivalent of a rock star to someone looking to make a career in government.  

    Is the CraigsList stuff more about the thrill of possibly being caught ?

    .

  4. …gave me the most poignant observation on men:

    “Men will follow their dicks into places they wouldn’t go with a gun.”

    Right.  Like Craigslist, I guess.

        1. The buyer said she was looking for “shabby chic.” Whatever. We called it trash, but we didn’t want to send it to the dump because even though it was old and worn (complete with chew marks from a certain house destroying dog), it was still usable. The best thing was we didn’t have to pay the dump to leave it there and we didn’t have to pay extra to our trash service for a large pick up. The buyer was the only person that responded to the listing and she picked up the table and four of the six chairs.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

81 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!