U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 04, 2011 06:42 PM UTC

McBride's Comments Raise Questions About Recall Effort

  • 34 Comments
  • by: c rork

(More recall shenanigans. – promoted by Aristotle)

The campaign committee seeking to recall DPS board President Nate Easley failed to file a campaign finance report by the deadline, yesterday. The committee has claimed to be running a full-fledged petitioning operation to gather 5,363 signatures by March 29th. The first report by the committee supporting Easley on Feb. 16th showed $16,275 raised, with no expenses listed.

The comments of John McBride, who registered the committee, should be cause for concern:

“We don’t have any money to file anything,” said John McBride, the lead petitioner in the recall effort against Easley and the registered agent for the committee Take Back Our Schools. “We don’t have a bank account yet. All we have is people power.”

The committee must file a report regardless of whether any money was spent or donated. I find it a little hard to believe that any money supporting the recall has been sitting in a sock drawer since the first filing deadline and that a petitioning effort hasn’t generated any expenses, whatsoever. Petitions, pens, printers, organizers, phones, clipboards, websites and database access can’t be purchased with people power. And if there have been expenses, how are they being tracked without a bank account? The lack of accountability or organization from the committee is shocking.

This comes on the heels of a diary that thoroughly debunked the purported reason behind the recall effort and included proponents of the recall using highly questionable tactics to intimidate bloggers.

The cost of a recall effort may set DPS back about $100,000 if the recall doesn’t coincide with the mayoral election. The district is already facing a $23 million reduction in total program funding next year.

The opponents of the recall include Gov. Hickenlooper and former mayors Frederico Pena and Wellington Webb.

Comments

34 thoughts on “McBride’s Comments Raise Questions About Recall Effort

  1. Defense should sue for plagiarism. Or does the “people power” v “grassroots community” make enough difference? Could you sue yourself for plagiarism anyway?

    What’s the sound of one hand clapping?

    How free to file is a free report?

  2. Take Back Our Schools’ Committee Registration form says they have a bank:

    Financial Institution

    Institution Name: WELLS FARGO

    Institution Address: 2559 WELTON ST.

    DENVER CO 80205

    You don’t suppose he’s lying, do you?

    1. McBride said he tried Wednesday to set up an account with Wells Fargo but that the bank was unable to find the committee ID number, which is listed on the secretary of state’s website. He said he planned to talk to state staffers today to straighten things out.

      If you can make sense out of what he’s saying, do let me know, because I sure can’t.

      McBride registered his committee on February 16th. Why he would wait until the last minute to do the most basic legalities is also beyond me.  

      1. Did his donors know he was using a sock drawer? $16K so far is not chump change for any kind of a race at Board level, that’s a fair amount of people donating $10, $20, even $100.

        1. The $16K raised is by Nate Easley’s committee, not McBride’s. We don’t know how much McBride’s committee has raised because he didn’t file his finance report on time. He claims they don’t have any money. You don’t need any money to file a campaign finance report showing you have not taken in any financial donations.

          So again, I’m far more curious why such a simple legality proves to be too much for this guy and his merry band of sidekicks.  

            1. And I think your larger point is the one that most folks are also thinking:

              “The lack of accountability or organization from the committee is shocking.”

              1. And yes, c rork’s larger point is right on.

                This whole time we’ve heard excuses about why Defense doesn’t have to do any of this, but that we shouldn’t worry because the actual recall committee is. Where the fuck are they to defend their media contact? What’s the excuse now?

                I know you don’t know and it’s not your fault, I’m just frustrated!

                1. The lack of transparency from both of these groups is just astonishing.

                  It taints their efforts, it taints their ethics, it taints every claim they make about why they are recalling Nate Easley (particularly when the claim on the petition itself has been proven to be an utter lie).

                  Like rork said, it costs money to print off petitions. If that’s their only expense, it still costs money.

                  Are these really the people we want in charge of a multi-million dollar school budget?

              2. There is no way to run a petitioning operation in this time frame without hiring people or without some type of organization. That requires money and “people power”. I had to do my share of petitioning a year ago, and it ain’t easy. 5k sigs is nothing to sneeze at.  

                1. Lunch with Cheryl sounds like a much better idea than talking to John McBride, if you ask me. Tell her I said hi and I’m thinking of you both.  

    2. You don’t have any money. And you’re trying to open a bank account? And banks usually, kind of, sort of, maybe like to see $$$ up front. Hmmm. I’d say, Lying. Big time. No, stupid. No, lying. No, stupid. No,… Oh, what the hell.  

  3. to hear who all is bankrolling this effort, how much money they have, who has donated and what organizations are taking part.

    None of these questions have been answered and I think people deserve a little accountability and transparency, especially when this effort is to recall someone. Its a pretty rare thing.

    How long are they going to hold off on releasing their financial records?

    I think the first question the average voter asks when they hear “recall” is “what did he do?”. There really isn’t a clear answer here because the “conflict of interest” story doesn’t hold. If Easley being on the DSF board is a conflict of interest worthy of a recall, its only fair that Guerrin Green go door to door to recall Andrea Merida for being a Romanoff staffer.

      1. What is it, $50 a day? A little expensive for someone with “no money”.

        Do you know if that sort of thing would be fair game during the “protest window”?

  4. You all remind me of a dog I used to live with.  That hound chased his tail relentlessly until he was about a year old.  Then he kind of stopped – but not really. Sometimes, for no real reason, he would get excited about actually catching it and for several days would spend every waking moment eying it sideways or in full chase.

    There is nothing to see here.  The only defense that matters in Denver now is the reborn Nuggets’ and whether the Rockies will be able to throw out stealing base  runners and turned the DP.

    Nothing. To. See.

    No money. No expenses. No in kind contributions.  Nothing at all. Really.

  5. You guys are such a joke.  As you know I’m not savy at this at all.  I’d love to share with you the SOS confirmation of the issue committee filing.  It says “your committee’s first disclosure report will be due on 4/19/2011.”  We didn’t know any different until the Ednews piece this morning.  As far as costs, I’ve bought three cases of paper at thirty dollars each and I have a copier at home.  I suppose I should figure on toner and staples when we do a report.  As far as the Easley money raised, how much of it is from board members of the DSF?  Still believe there isn’t a conflict of interest?  Maybe not legally but how about morally?  Do you have morals?

    1. Hell, no, I don’t have morals, except good ones. This isn’t about morals.

      Ethics? That’s another thing altogether. Law? that’s another thing. Yes, you should report your toner and staples, when (if) you do a report. And if you’re contributing such toner and staples while using your home or office, you should report that, too, excluding the time you get up to take a crap. (Which you’re full of.)

      Savy (sic)? You guys have as much savvy as you have reason for this whole recall effort. Sounds like a personal vendetta, nothing more. There’s been nothing about policy differences in this whole mess.

      Denverites aren’t going to buy your hooey. Drop it. You don’t have a chance. You’re wasting your money. Oh, that’s right. You don’t use that stuff. Whatever.

    2. Why don’t you, you know, SHOW how this is so immoral? And then tell us how moral you thought it was of Merida to get herself sworn in early, just to take part in a vote her side had no chance of winning?

      Morals? Don’t make me laugh.

    3. Go to the SOS site and look at the committee’s page.  It says your first report is due March 3, and gives you the start and end dates of the filing period.  If your committee existed during this period, you have to file.  If your letter says different, you have grounds for an appeal, so file one.  But you are technically in violation, you need to file that report, and then you need to appeal the fine when you get a letter from the SoS.

      Good luck.

    4. I don’t know you.

      Perhaps you are a CPA. Perhaps you are a lawyer. Perhaps you are an unemployed truck driver.  

      I’m not going to advise you on how and what to file.

      Who are you and what is it you think you need to file?  Are you filing or yourself? or some “committee”? If committee, which one? What’s your part of the committee?

      As for blasting away at the CoPolsters asking questions, raising eyebrows and generally pissing on DeFense Denver and or Chuck McBride – if you support the recall, why?

      Are you aware that the estimate is that a recall will cost DPS over $100,000? Do you believe this is a prudent expense?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

37 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!