Today, the one-seat minority Colorado House Democrats, with a few Republicans, are trying to put their own stamp on the state budget–principally attempting to reduce cuts to public education. The Pueblo Chieftain’s Patrick Malone reported this morning:
In the run-up to today’s budget debate in the House, Rep. Tom Massey met with Gov. John Hickenlooper on Tuesday to explore options for reducing $250 million in proposed cuts to education.
Meanwhile, House Democrats crafted plans to challenge the same reduction and other elements of the state’s 2011-12 budget proposal, including the proposed closure of Fort Lyon Correctional Facility. Democrats expect to offer about three dozen amendments to the budget…
Front and center in the budget debate is education funding. Massey, R-Poncha Springs, said the impact on rural schools from the proposed cuts would be disparate, because communities with low tax bases are unable to backfill the absence of state support with local funds.
“We’ve always had some gross inequities with regard to the haves and have-nots. We don’t want to further exacerbate those,” Massey said.
Consequently, both Democrats and Republicans would like to see the cuts lessened.
Make that some Republicans, like the eminently reasonable Rep. Tom Massey. Unfortunately for Massey, his views on education apparently aren’t shared by his caucus’ leadership–despite what GOP chairman Ryan Call claims. The AP reports with much less bipartisan lovey-dovey:
Democratic House Leader Rep. Sal Pace said his party will attempt Wednesday to reduce $250 million in cuts to K-12 education and amend a bill that modifies the monthly enrollment fee on a health care program for low-income children.
Republican House Leader Rep. Amy Stephens criticized Democrats’ plans.
“If Sal wants to get partisan to make a name for them, they’re welcome to. It’s unfortunate,” she said, later adding: “If you want to have a show for a day, by all means. I mean, you waste all of our time running all that.”
Just like the Senate GOP men, and their anti-Planned Parenthood budget amendment last Friday? Oops! So what do you think makes better politics–saving education funds, or alienating women voters a la Ken Buck? We have a theory if anyone wants to hear it.
But that’s not the best part: this would be the same Rep. Amy Stephens who spiked the health care exchange bill with her ridiculous “anti-Obamacare” amendment not a week and a half ago, right? The latest word is Stephens will not kill the health care exchange with her “Tea Party”-placating amendment as originally threatened, but for Stephens to complain about “getting partisan” after that spectacle…well, it’s at least as absurd as Ryan Call claiming Republicans saved education. Not to mention–Rep. Stephens still hasn’t gotten the memo, Ryan!
There’s more story here than either the Chieftain or the AP saw fit to print, and that’s a shame.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: unnamed
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: Duke Cox
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: xxyyzz
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: ParkHill
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: NotHopeful
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: NotHopeful
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
is starting to resemble a botomless pit. I thought that’s why we have local property taxes. Isn’t the state responsible only for supplementing only the poorest school districts?
just how local should education financing be?
The more you rely on local funding, the bigger the differences there are between, say, kids at Cherry Hills Elementary and San Luis Elementary. But they’re all held accountable to the same annual CSAP standard.
And ultimately, all American kids headed to college are held accountable to the same SAT and ACT standard. Does that unfairly hurt kids from Mississippi when they’re trying to enroll in the same schools as kids from well-funded schools from, say, Westchester, NY?
Besides, local funding relies on property tax, which is a lousy way to fund anything. Income tax or consumption taxes are much more equitable, but they’re generally levied only by state and federal governments.
Damn, this turned out to be almost blog length.
the general fund should supplement only the poorest school districts.
I thought in Colorado (ideally under law) the State was supposed to ensure a sufficient minimal level of spending on the schools, and then the school districts could supplement if they wished. That’s not what we have, and our current Constitutional Amendment Spaghetti has driven us from that standard and prevents us from returning to it.
What exactly is the advantage to local tax collection for schools? Isn’t mostly centralized funding and mostly local control a better mechanism?
Not in Colorado. Here, in the land of TABOR and the School Finance Act, we have something called “thorough and uniform”. It means the Cherry Creek and Aspen get approx 50% of their annual budget from the state.
Why is it okay for Sal Pace to mess around with the hard won deal, but not Mike Kopp?
Fortunately, cooler heads, like Amy Stephens, prevail.
Right wingers don’t have a decent sense of humor? You’re a riot!