(“Not that we don’t have freedom of speech, but…” – promoted by Colorado Pols)
The El Paso County Republican Party executive committee passed a measure Monday night recommending, but not mandating, that party officers refrain from criticizing elected Republicans.
ReclaimTheBlue blogger Al Maurer broke the story that a resolution was introduced by Republican Bob Denny “on behalf of Rep. Amy Stephens” and was “designed to stifle opposition to SB-200.” HB 200, which cleared the Colorado House today by a 44-21 vote, establishes health insurance exchanges and has been opposed by Tea Party organizations, while supported by business organizations.
Denny, who represents HD-20 on the El Paso County Republican Party executive committee, told me today that Stephens asked him to bring it up, but he did not introduce the measure on her behalf.
“It was precipitated by SB 200, but the issue was broader than that,” Denny said. “She was concerned about it, and I introduced the measure in general terms.”
Denny declined to say who helped draft the resolution.
“Not that we don’t have freedom of speech, but as party officers, when you’re talking to the press or sending a mass email or something, you shouldn’t undermine party elected officials,” he said. “Party officers don’t agree with everything all the time, but we should at least be neutral.”
“The purpose of our officers is to get Republicans into office, and not undermine the work of those we sent to Denver,” Denny said, adding that there’s no way a resolution like this could stifle debate on SB-200 or other issues people care about.
Denny said it wasn’t practical for a party officer to broadcast personal opinions to the media, outside of his or her role as a party officer, because the party officer would inevitably be seen as representing the Republican Party.
“I was in the Air Force,” he said. “When you put a uniform on and you start talking, you were seen a representing the Air Force. You might say, I’m speaking for myself, but the press are going to pick you up as representing the Air Force.”
The resolution, which Denny said was a recommendation to the GOP central committee, passed after amendments were added, among which was changing “shall” to “should,” specifying that no mandate was passed, only guidance to party officers.
Maurer wrote on his blog post, which was titled, “Stifling Debate in the El Paso County GOP:”
In the end, cooler heads prevailed, and the measure passed with amendments that made it clear that county officers should remain neutral but were not absolutely prevented from speaking out. A big thanks is due to those on the committee who, while recognizing the need for civility in discourse and party discipline and unity, also balanced that with concerns for free speech and reasoned, open debate. You can read the measure for yourself, with my handwritten edits, here.
But watch what you write on Facebook, Twitter or your blog-all mentioned specifically in the measure-Big Sis is watching. Clearly name-calling and personal attacks are simply rude and uncalled for, but no one in public office should have a problem with honest disagreements on policy. We’re not Democrats after all.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Tina Peters’ Final Appeal To Supreme Court Fails
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Colorado Republicans On The Run, Meet Under A Literal Bridge
BY: cgrandits
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: cgrandits
IN: Why Everybody Loves Jared Polis
BY: kwtree
IN: Republicans are Totally Not Terrified of Kamala Harris
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Colorado Republicans On The Run, Meet Under A Literal Bridge
BY: davebarnes
IN: Tina Peters’ Final Appeal To Supreme Court Fails
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: The Road to Respectability Won’t Include Matt Burcham
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Tina Peters’ Final Appeal To Supreme Court Fails
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Leave our elected Republicans aloooone!!!!1!!!one!!
So this is supposed to help Amy not draw a primary challenge, how?
Where the party leaders controlled the conversation and the rank and file were expected to pay, pray, & obey. It might still work for Republicans, but I doubt it.
Good luck with that, Repubs.
What is Pols coming to?
But for those trying to put the T in GO(T)P – suckas.
do the tea partiers dislike this bill? If they are there to help business, and business likes it… I don’t get it.
Doesn’t the GOTP know that the US Chamber paid for their electoral successes? Probably not a great idea to bite the hand that feeds…
In their world, that’s all that counts.