U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 05, 2011 10:43 PM UTC

Health Care Exchange Survives "Amycare" Onslaught; Will Amy?

  • 9 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

As the Colorado Independent’s Joseph Boven reports:

A bill to create health insurance exchanges in Colorado passed out of the Senate today, becoming one of the few bills to make it through the fires of Tea Party and other conservative groups this year. While Republicans largely voted against the bill, it passed with no discussion in the Democratically controlled Senate and is now on its way to the governor’s desk.

The bill sponsored by Sen. Betty Boyd, D-Westminster, and House Majority Leader Amy Stephens, R-Monument, survived heavy opposition from “conservative grassroots organizations” and an attempt to add a poison pill amendment by Stephens on its way to final passage…

Tea Party and “grassroots conservative” activists said Wednesday that they would look at influencing Republican primaries and might begin working on recall efforts of Republicans who voted in favor of the bill.

While Stephens said during a press meeting Wednesday that she did not want to turn the bill into a Tea Party debate, she said that she encourages political involvement and conversation. She said she would have been remiss in her job to govern if she did not work to pass SB 200.

We said earlier that Rep. Amy Stephens, regardless of the ultimate fate of Senate Bill 200, did severe damage to her credibility by threatening a ‘poison pill’ “anti-Obamacare” amendment under pressure from conservative activists both in and outside of her district. This silly, potentially dealbreaking move infuriated everyone she had worked with on the bill, up to and including a rare flash of public anger from Gov. John Hickenlooper. Stephens’ work since then to pass the bill without her amendment confirms widespread rumors that she was severely rebuked by the many powerful interests backing SB-200–interests whose support, or lack thereof, matters much more to Rep. Stephens’ career than anything the “Tea Party” can do to her.

Unless we’re wrong about that, of course, and reportedly we’re going to find out.

Comments

9 thoughts on “Health Care Exchange Survives “Amycare” Onslaught; Will Amy?

  1. It’s a free market solution – or partial solution – to a major pricing problem.

    All Senator Stephens needs to do is explain it to the tea partier opposition.  ONce they understand it, they’ll get on board, right?  I mean why wouldn’t they?

    Personally, I don’t care as long as the gov’t keeps their hands off my Medicare.

  2. Will anyone now want to allow Heath Care cooperatives with SB 168?  It is a unique Colorado solution and targets a different demographic than the exchanges.  Could this legislative body be that enlightened?

      1. This is a tempest in a teapot.  The wingnuts have targeted her and McNulty going back to the election when they stood by their responsibilities as party leaders and supported Mayes instead of Tancredo – both held their noses, but did their duty.  The El Paso County wingnuts all ran to Tancredo but never gave up their Republican registrations.  Now they have come back into the party and are seeking vengenance against McNulty and Stephens.

        The party should toss them out on their butts rather than allowing the wingnuts to implode the party.

        Both McNulty and Stephens will be fine.  They cannot really be recalled and the wingnuts do not have the discipline to stay on target for the 2012 cycle.  They will probably field someone at the precinct caucuses, but will fall short at the nominating assemblies.

        Incumbency is a powerful foundation, and incumbency of someone who is in leadership is even more powerful.

        Besides, Schultheis has probably misplaced his jack boots and you can’t run a hate campaign without jack boots.

  3. activists Nathan Wilkes, Patty Sullivan, Dede DePercin, Kellie Fritts, Micki Farrin, Carol Blackard, Dave Bean, and so many others who have worked on health care reform for years. They are truly inspiring people, and deserve a lot of credit for selfless efforts! Thank you!

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

65 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!