President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 11, 2011 02:36 AM UTC

All Over But The Shouting?

  • 11 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: House GOP map killed tonight by the Senate State Affairs Committee, making a special session of the legislature, or the courts, or both, a certainty.

—–

FOX 31’s Eli Stokols updates on redistricting as the clock runs down to sine die tomorrow:

Last night, after a Republican-drawn map passed the GOP-controlled House, Senate Democrats waited until after 8 p.m. to begin debating their own proposed map and then, despite the snark and outrage from their Republican colleagues, effectively filibustered their own bill in order, which died as the clock struck midnight, leaving them without enough time left in the expiring session to pass it in both chambers.

Senate Republicans returned the favor Tuesday morning, engaging in their own stalling tactics by forcing every bill to be read at length on the Senate floor until Democrats agreed to hear the GOP’s redistricting proposal that passed the House Monday afternoon…

“Brandon Shaffer insists on drawing a congressional district to serve his own ambitions,” McNulty told FOX 31 Denver Tuesday afternoon. “And we’re not going to support ripping the eastern plains apart to draw him a congressional district.”

Shaffer, meanwhile, continues to portray McNulty and Republicans as the main obstacle in the way of a deal based around Democratic proposals, which seek more drastic changes to district lines in an effort to make congressional districts more “competitive.”

“Whenever I sat down with Speaker McNulty on the Democratic maps, he just dismissed them out of hand,” Shaffer said Tuesday. “He didn’t want to even discuss those maps or negotiate off the Democrats map. I think those Democratic maps are very fair, they’re both competitive and the serve the interests of the people of Colorado.”

We do think a point is worth clarifying here: as we’ve said all along during the “Kumbaya Committee” process, and other points along the way where it seemed like the situation had degenerated into meaningless prattle, all of the testimony in the traveling committee hearings around the state, as well as the hours of debate in the legislature, including last night, serve a very important purpose: establishment of a record that the courts will reference in the increasingly likely event the legislature can’t make a deal. So that, given the immediate fate of Senate Bill 268 as soon as the Senate was done debating it, helps explain what Democrats were doing more accurately than “effectively filibustering their own bill.”

As the story is told to us, Democrats were defending it on the record, in a way that will matter more than turning it over to McNulty for summary execution.

But despite the growing arithmetical probability of ending the session with no deal on redistricting, there are fresh rumors going around of continued negotiations in the Senate. Whether it’s clever parliamentary procedure to fudge deadlines, or major revisions to the Republican map sufficient to please Democrats, remains to be seen–but we think you all know at this point to not get your hopes up, don’t you? We’ll update as needed, but only until bedtime.

Comments

11 thoughts on “All Over But The Shouting?

  1. This just shows the Democrats had no intention of finding a rational compromise from the get go.

    Either its that explanation or they realized just how ridiculous and hurtful their radical maps were for all Coloradans.

      1. I almost half agree with it.  The part that ‘Tad fails to mention is that no one on either side had any intention of working toward finding a rational compromise.  The whole process has been nothing but a circular firing squad.  None of these children have any idea how to play nice; and leadership (Hell, what’s that?) has been completely AWOL or non-existant.

        In all the conversations that these pampered brats have had about teachers, public employees, ad infinitum, over the past serveral years you always hear a greek chorus regarding “paying for performance.”  Well, I can only conclude that Colorado taxpayers deserve all of our money back this year, and that includes the mileage and per diems too, from everyone of these childish fuckers.

        1. Their original HB1319 was a very fair map. I doubt the courts will give the Dems so fair a map.

          CD’s 4 and 6 would have been within Dem striking distance, CD3 was almost surely would have plipped back to Dem in 2012; CD7 was safe with Ed P.; CD’s 1, 2, and 5 were safe with their current parties.

          And the community of interest that divided was Aurora, and it was divided on county lines (mostly). There were a couple of weird slivers of counties cut out of Adams, Jeffco and Arapahoe, but I was shopping an Amendment to fix those with the sponsors approval.

          Dems blew it this time.

            1. And the GOP did not mean for that ne to be and they so much as said so. It said it was their response to the Dems refusal to budge one inch from their pre-session decision to send this issue to the courtroom rather than the committeeroom.

    1. The night that Sen. Heath refused to allow amendments to SB268 other than his own strike-below, that was when I realized the Dems never had any intention of passing a map.

      I vented all my rage directly to those I hold responsible. I have none left to share here.

  2. When you dump the puck back to the defense behind the red line with 22 seconds left in the game, when leading by 1 goal that is a way to control the game output.

    In politics when you present a bill and then talk it for the last 22 seconds of the session that is tactics fulfilling the strategy.

    When a person lacking the ability to comprehend strategy and tactics in the actions of one party with the inept actions of parsimony and hate of another party that person spends a lot of time in “time out”.

  3. The legislature has very few required responsibilities. Among them is the requirement to pass a balanced budget every year and to draw new Congressional boundaries after each census.

    That being said, I find it unacceptable that the Courts are allowed to draw these maps. It’s the sole responsibility of the legislature. I get to vote on my state representative and senator, but not on judges. I can hold my representatives responsible for how they draw the map, but there is little recourse for what the Court decides.

    The Courts have other options than simply doing the work of the legislature. The state Supreme Court needs to order the legislature into a special session until a map is passed. Set a deadline and hold EVERY member of the legislature in contempt of court if a map is not approved.

    Not being able to agree is not an acceptable excuse. I’m so tired of both sides putting their battle for power above the interests of the state. Both sides played politics and failed to fulfill their oath. There needs to be consequences for such disregard of the Constitution and disrespect for the people of Colorado!  

  4. should have (?) or could have (?) played in mediating the legislative debate about Congressional redistricting.  Wouldn’t a well-brokered agreement have been much better for BOTH parties?  Everyone could have gone home and bragged about what a great job they did in redrawing the boundaries.

    There are LOTS of ways to come up with a new map that would have been acceptable to both sides — many options have been discussed here — so why has leadership (legislative and the Governor’s Office) failed so miserably on this?

    1. legislative session, the public absence of our new Governor to do anything to lead, shape, or direct any of the non-outcomes this year.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

90 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!