U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line
(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 31, 2011 10:38 PM UTC

Among friends on radio, McInnis says he has "complete vindication" but "just a little too late"

  • 8 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman

( – promoted by Colorado Pols)

“You are among friends here,” Rick Wagner told his radio guest Scott McInnis Thursday. “No one is going to try to pick at you because I know there is a limited amount you can say about it.”

Wagner kept his promise, stroking McInnis for about 15 minutes, even saying that McInnis’ plagiarism “was brought up by his primary opponent in the election, which of course was The Denver Post. I believe they were running for governor.” (McInnis has also blamed The Post for his downfall.)

Feeling comfy, McInnis told Wagner that last week’s regulatory decision not to strip him of his law license was “kind of bittersweet news” but, still, “gave us complete vindication.”

“Just a little too late,” he said.

Why did McInnis wait until it was too late? Why didn’t he release the emails that allegedly instructed Rolly Fischer not to plagiarize? That’s the question everyone’s been asking, and of course Wagner didn’t ask it.

But McInnis seems to think he had provided proof of his innocence all along, but no one listened!

“And at the beginning, we obviously stated exactly what had occurred, and we were vindicated by the Supreme Court that came out with the same kind of findings,” McInnis told Wagner, who interviewed McInnis Thursday on KFKA’ s Amy Oliver Show (1310 AM in Greeley). Wagner was substituting for Oliver.

Wagner should have pointed out that the report of the state’s Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel, whose record has been questioned by Westword, did not exonerate McInnis. It allowed him to practice law, but it didn’t clear him of plagiarism or of fraud.

As The Denver Post’s Dean Singleton said on KHOW’s Caplis and Silverman show last week, McInnis is still a plagiarist, even if the plagiarism was  executed by his assistant Rolly Fischer. This conforms with the view of Prof. Bob Steele, a journalism ethics guru, who pointed out last year that even if text is given freely to a writer, word-for-word use of it still constitutes plagiarism. And in McInnis’ case, Colorado Supreme Court Justice Gregory Hobbs did not authorize McInnis to use his words.

Neither has McInnis been cleared of misrepresenting his water-musings articles to the Hasan Family Foundation, which he described as “original,”  leaving him open to charges of fraud. Seeme Hasan acknowledged on KHOW’s Caplis and Silverman show that contrary to what the Foundation stated last year, McInnis did inform her, on a fax cover sheet, that he had hired an assistant to work on the water project. But Hasan says the assistant could have been answering the phones, for all she know. She did not know he would be writing the water musings, and she would not have allowed this had she known, she told KHOW.

With these issues unaddressed, it was easy for McInnis to tell Wagner, who’s a conservative columnist for the Grand Junction Sentinel, that “Laurie and I are very thrilled” with the attorney-regulation report.

Looking ahead, McInnis told Wagner that he thinks the attacks on him were so successful that they will be replicated.

“Look at the destruction that it did to us,” McInnis said. “And I think you’re actually going to see this tool utilized even more in the future.”

Is McInnis thinking there are more candidates out there who got paid $300,000 for a two-year fellowship, hired a research assistant to do the job, and didn’t have the time or inclination to make absolutely sure the final product wasn’t copied from a Supreme Court Justice? And then tried to blame everything on his research assistant?

We don’t know, because Wagner didn’t ask.

(Click here for the BigMediaBlog transcript of the McInnis interview discussed above. Contact jason@bigmedia.org for a copy of the audio recording of the McInnis interview.)

Follow Jason Salzman on Twitter @bigmediablog.

Tweet
Share

Comments

8 thoughts on “Among friends on radio, McInnis says he has “complete vindication” but “just a little too late””

  2. a student who hired someone else to write a term paper that the hired writer, not the student plagiarized? The student would be completely vindicated?  Interesting. Teach your children well, Scottie. Wonder how he’d score on that psycopathy test we’ve been hearing so much about.

    1. It is not uncommon for politicians to have writers.  This happens all the time.  Most have writers on staff.  

      If you read the report of findings for the administrative hearing, Scott provided evidence to prove his innocence.  Neither the Hasans or the Denver Post could produce any shred of evidence to prove/justify their hit piece.   That is the fact!  There was ZERO proof of any plagerism by McInnis.

      I certainly have questions about getting paid $300,000 for a paper of the sort.  I don’t necessarily agree with the politics of Scott McInnis, but he was able to dig up proof from his files that were almost a decade old.   One would think Dean Singlton and the Denver Post (or even that of the Hasans) could deliver proof for their case, but they did not!  Nonetheless, Scott did pay back the $300,000 since he, indeed, did not write the document.  I have a feeling the $300,000 was not for the document, though.  

      I know for a fact that faovors were asked of Scott, and when he refused to endorse Ali Hasan’s candidacy at the State GOP Convention, threats were made and this subsequently happened a short time thereafter.  

      There are no coincidences!

      1. So, jraiffie, who gave you your activation orders?

        I see your account was setup 5 months ago, and yet your only comments are just today on stale threads.

        What’s the going rate for right wing shills these days?

      2. Maybe if I didn’t use my name as my username, I could understand the name calling.  Sleeper Agent, really?  Very Funny.

        Its this type of response that has kept me from waisting my time on this site, to answer your question.  

        And then I got to thinking.  I understand those like yourself are a product of your own flawed education.  I figured I would give it a go and try to educate myself as to how others think, and debate those who don’t think like I do.  My friends tell me not to wast my time as all I will face are personal attacks such as yours.  Coincidence the first comment I get is as such?  I think NOT!  I see I’m off to a fantastic start. Ha!  

        Why don’t you try something new and different, and actually put some substance / intelligence behind your comment.  Come now, you must have some basis to refute my comments other than personal attacks?

        Lets try this, shall we?  What exactly in my comment is it that you have a problem with?

        1. That is the fact!  There was ZERO proof of any plagerism by McInnis.

          Regardless of how despicable you are in real life, or how well-manned and wonderful you are,

          1) this is a blog and blogs get snarky–it isn’t a leftist only phenomena, read any comment thread on Fox News for instance, ‘your’ side can get down right nasty, vulgar, etc.

          2) You have yet to provide that intelligence and substance…so I will wait until you do to offer any in return.  

          1. Apparantly you don’t know how to read.  The official administrative court findings, which i released and which were published on Complete Colorado indicated quite the opposite.  Do yourself a favor and read the official records before making such claims…you are totally 100% in the wrong on this one.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

112 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!