(Tipton had better straighten this out, and soon. In politics the coverup is almost always worse than the crime, and Tipton’s in danger of making this look like a bigger scandal (whether it is or not) by not getting his story straight. – promoted by Colorado Pols)
In another exemplary radio interview on the conservative Steamboat Springs Cari and Rob Show yesterday, hosts Rob Douglas and Cari Hermancinski grilled Rep. Scott Tipton, whom they call a House-freshman “canary in the coal mine,” about his daughter’s job with technology company whose licensed products are sold by other companies to congressional offices.
The two hosts were particularly direct with Tipton about the offer and start date of his daughter’s job with the Washington DC firm.
On April 7, on the same radio show, Tipton said the company “offered it [the job] to her [his daughter] before the election.”
To make sure he had it straight April 7, host Rob Douglas asked Tipton if his daughter had started her job “before the outcome of the last election.”
Tipton said, “Yes.”
But The Denver Post reported Friday that Tipton’s daughter started full-time in January, when Tipton took office.
Douglas tried unsuccessfully yesterday to get the story straight.
Douglas: Your daughter went to work for Broadnet officially when?
Tipton: I think she started right after the Christmas term.
Douglas: When was she offered that job?
Tipton: It was my understanding after she had done her internship here a year or so ago, that when she was getting ready to graduate from college, that they had a job for her.
Douglas: Was there an official offer made to her from Broadnet?
Tipton: You know Rob, I can’t tell ya. We’re getting into the weeds of family business and her personal business as well. I can’t give you the date because I don’t monitor it that closely.
Douglas: Can you get us that date after you get to Washington?
Tipton: I can probably ask her if she chooses. This has been very difficult on her because she hasn’t done anything wrong.
Douglas is right to be annoyed by the strange squirrelliness on Tipton’s part. (And he expressed his frustration in greater detail to the Colorado Independent.)
Douglas should ask Tipton directly if his daughter’s job was tied to his congressional victory. It’s a reasonable question, given that Tipton’s daughter has been using her father’s name in letters to members of Congress.
You might think Douglas is going nowhere with his questions about when the job offer was made to Tipton’s daughter, and you may be right, especially since Broadnet is owned by Tipton’s nephew and Tipton’s daughter had a part-time job with the company before she started work full-time.
Still, it’s a reasonable question and Douglas should stay after it.
My guess is that Douglas will follow-up, especially because his show apparently was the first media outlet to question Tipton, in an April 7 interview, about his daughter’s job with Broadnet.
Instead of crediting the Cari and Rob Show with raising the issue first, Tipton’s spokesperson blamed Democrat Nancy Pelosi for sending a “lap-dog” to Colorado to “fire up the rumor mill with a cheap Washington political attack on a 22-year-old girl,” according to Politico.
Asked by Douglas and Hermancinski for evidence that Pelosi was pushing the story about his daughter and Broadnet, Tipton acknowledged he had no such evidence. “Maybe it was an assumption,” he said.
The Cari and Rob Show’s questioning of Tipton is getting noticed. Last month, Tipton admitted he’s lost trust in House Speaker Boehner, after he agreed to a budget compromise opposed by Tipton.
Tipton later backtracked, saying to a national blog that has confidence in Boehner, but he never returned to the Cari and Rob Show to explain why he has a more positive view of Boehner, despite promises by both Douglas and Tipton that he would do so.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Sandy Hook Denier Tom Ready Headlines “Strong Women of Pueblo” With Barbora Hurd
BY: Reason Wins
IN: Presenting The Harris/Walz Ticket
BY: Reason Wins
IN: Sandy Hook Denier Tom Ready Headlines “Strong Women of Pueblo” With Barbora Hurd
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Presenting The Harris/Walz Ticket
BY: harrydoby
IN: Presenting The Harris/Walz Ticket
BY: Sparky
IN: Sandy Hook Denier Tom Ready Headlines “Strong Women of Pueblo” With Barbora Hurd
BY: Air Slash
IN: Presenting The Harris/Walz Ticket
BY: Air Slash
IN: Presenting The Harris/Walz Ticket
BY: Air Slash
IN: Presenting The Harris/Walz Ticket
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
if Tipton now avoids Cari and Rob and characterizes them as “unfair” and “biased” media personalities or as “lap dogs” of some such nefarious anti-GOP Soros-backed whatever. Although commonplace now in Palin era, that would be a bad move, given that (a) listeners won’t buy it and (b) it’s election season and Cari and Rob can hammer him every day for the next year and a half and would boost their ratings and have fun doing it, making an example of him as a typical lily-livered politico.
In the Independent article there are no qualifiers like “we suspect” or “we think”. On the basis of no evidence whatsoever a simple declarative accusation:
Tipton and his family members may not be guilty of anything actionable but he and his team are looking sleazier very day and not just to Dems.
I think that’s the real story that hasn’t come out. She was using her father’s name to generate income for what is basically the family business – a service that is probably paid for with taxpayer dollars (like franked mail).
Does that comply with current ethics laws?
The Cari and Rob show is from Steamboat Springs.
Why not wait for the committee to respond?
Personally, my daughter would hate me if I tried to know this much about her job. And he clearly says that she got the offer before he was elected, so there’s very little ‘there’ here.
Such as “speculation” that Pelosi had sent Cari and Rob as her “lap dogs”?
Does your daughter try and leverage your position as an elected official to line the family pockets with taxpayer dollars?
about 2 weeks ago Tipton sent out a big glossy brochure about medicare, how much he loves seniors etc. In it, he asked for money. He used the franking priviledge, meaning taxpayers paid for his campaign material. Wonder how much that cost us?
Tipton did not ask for money. The mailing was shameless, and franked, but was not a solicitation for money. So get off it.
I didn’t see it because I’m not on the good person list; but my friends told me that he asked for money. Do you have a copy? I’d love to see the whole thing and put this to rest in my mind. I just HATE it when politicians use tax money to campaign.
Thanks to Gertie who gave me hers. I will put it on my site when I get around to writing a piece about Tipton’s Freshman Blunders.