President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 30, 2011 07:09 PM UTC

Gardner Spokesperson Pushes Debt Ceiling Denial Envelope

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Back in June, we had some fun with the…unusual defense of freshman Rep. Cory Gardner’s vote in favor of the GOP 2012 budget proposal (known as the “Ryan Plan”) offered by Gardner’s spokesperson Rachel Boxer. Despite the undisputed agreement that the 2012 GOP budget would result in large reductions in coverage for Medicare beneficiaries starting in ten years, Gardner spokesperson Boxer asserted that since the number of dollars being spent on Medicare would continue to grow every year, Medicare was “not being cut at all.”

A bit of a problem since her boss and everybody else in the Republican Party was out there selling the fact that their budget would “reduce” (their words) the cost of Medicare. And although she didn’t get called on it by the reporter, we have to think there are lot of people in CD-4 smart enough to understand things like population growth, or have ever gotten a smaller piece of pie than they wanted. That is, any of the considerable number of Gardner’s constituents who know better; and can see through this wildly deceptive semantic contortion in about two seconds.

We’re sorry to report, via NOCO5, that Ms. Boxer is at it again.

A routine news report about one of the more or less daily protests outside the offices of Colorado Republican congressmen this week on the debt-ceiling impasse–this one yesterday in Ft. Collins outside Gardner’s office there. The most interesting part starts exactly one minute into the report, and seems to become the whole focus of the story afterward:

Boxer: There is nothing in the Boehner Plan being voted on today that directly addresses the issue of Medicare…

As most of our readers following this debate know, the Boehner plan would have created a bipartisan “super committee” of legislators charged with finding an additional almost $2 trillion in cuts to “entitlement programs”–that’s Social Security and Medicare, right? What’s more, Boehner’s bill, the one Gardner voted for yesterday, would make adoption of these cuts mandatory in order to allow the debt ceiling to be increased long enough to get through next year. While Sen. Harry Reid’s Senate alternative also creates a committee to find more cuts, Reid’s bill doesn’t make extension of the debt ceiling through 2012 contingent on adopting them.

Bottom line: the bill that Cory Gardner voted for yesterday evening was designed to force, and would indeed have resulted in, huge cuts to Medicare. It would simply have forced those cuts six months from now, while simultaneously forcing another all-consuming political crisis–the very same engineered climate of panic over the debt ceiling as we are living through today.

The NOCO5 reporter who mindlessly bought this cowpie is no longer smiling? Sorry about that!

Like the semantically tortured idea that the 2012 budget Gardner voted for doesn’t cut Medicare “at all,” you might spend a couple of reasonable minutes entertaining this–before realizing that it’s off-message, wholly intended to mislead, and above all, preposterous.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Gardner Spokesperson Pushes Debt Ceiling Denial Envelope

  1. It’d be five except for the one degree of separation with the second bill and second guaranteed debt ceiling faux crisis. It’s deceptive enough to be well into absurd territory. I agree on off message as well, I thought we wanted to cut Medicare for the children?

    Please stop earning chihuahuas, Rachel! Larimer County animal shelters are full enough.

  2. This is very much about reforming entitlement spending. Republicans need to be able to articulate this without fear and without any stammering. We are going to reduce the cost of Medicare to taxpayers. It’s the only thing that will ensure it’s available to future generations, as Boxer herself (and Obama) said right after she foolishly denied this bill is about Medicare.

    On the other hand, if dozens of dirty hippies were to suddenly crowd my office, I might tell them anything they want to hear in hopes they will leave.

    🙂

      1. We’ll just get Democrats to negotiate and sign the bill for us, so we can run campaign ads against them. Did you guys just figure out politics yesterday?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

97 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!