President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 30, 2011 06:19 PM UTC

They're All Tom Tancredos Now

  • 15 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Los Angeles Times:

As FEMA’s budget is under new strain in the aftermath of Hurricane Irene, a top House Republican maintained that any new funds allocated for federal disaster relief must be offset by budget cuts elsewhere.

Speaking on Fox News Channel, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said a natural disaster like Hurricane Irene is an “appropriate instance” for a federal role, but that the government can’t go deeper into debt to pay for unexpected outlays…

Cantor’s position has been the consistent view of majority Republicans since taking control of the House, even with disaster relief funding running thin after yet another severe weather event. [Pols emphasis]

In anticipation of new requests for federal support, FEMA confirmed Monday it would temporarily halt appropriations for any new projects tied to previous disasters like the tornadoes in Missouri or Alabama.

Reading this story, we were reminded of the vote by former Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado in 2005 against disaster relief funding for victims of Hurricane Katrina–one of only 11 members of Congress to do so, and the only member from Colorado’s delegation. Tancredo came in for some intense criticism over that vote, but he never once apologized for it: almost a point of pride to have made “the hard decision” to prioritize spending restraint over disaster relief.

And as you can see, today he’s got plenty of company.

Comments

15 thoughts on “They’re All Tom Tancredos Now

    1. Let’s hope so. And let’s hope they make it very clear why and how they are able to do this against the will of the meanies who never saw a perk, break or subsidy for the corporate elite they weren’t willing to go deep into debt for.

  1. Hard to fit this we can’t afford to help people attitude into the kind of heartwarming, can do patriotic take they favor in the face of disasters, at least those that don’t disproportionately affect poor minorities.  Anti-government echo chamber on the right has raised tone deafness to new level if they think this attitude is going to play in the heartland. Govs of states involved, including R Govs, are pretty happy with quality of fed government  support and probably looking for as much quantity as they can get.    

    1. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion

      While Americans ought to prepare for the coming storm, federal dollars need not subsidize their preparations. Although it might sound outrageous, the truth is that the National Hurricane Center and its parent agency, the National Weather Service, are relics from America’s past that have actually outlived their usefulness.

      [snip]

      Today the NWS justifies itself on public interest grounds. It issues severe weather advisories and hijacks local radio and television stations to get the message out…Americans need not be forced to turn over part of their earnings to support weather reporting.

      [snip]

      As it stands today, the public is forced to pay more than $1 billion per year for the NWS.  With the federal deficit exceeding a trillion dollars, the NWS is easily overlooked, but it shouldn’t be. It may actually be dangerous.

      [all emphasis mine]

      1. They have gone from railing against government that people don’t like or that costs a lot of money to railing against government that people do like that is central to the purpose of government.

        Their ideology is bent on the destruction of modern society.

      2. In that case, Fox is equally tone deaf. I really don’t think, with major weather disasters having recently taken place in every region across the US that they will be able to spin this the way they think they can to the general public.

        Unlike Katrina, the disasters of the past year have impacted lots of Fox approved heartland and red state Republican white folks.  

    1. Really, that is nuts.  And, IF independent voters become informed of the true GOP agenda like this, the Dems will have a huge victory in 2012.  IF is in capital letters only because the Dems have been so pathetic at getting this message out.

    2. The ones who got smacked last, or the ones who are going to get smacked next?

      I think you’d be hard put to find any Americans who wouldn’t want to jump in and help people in need.

      But maybe I know different Americans than you.  You seem to know the ones who say, “I’ve got mine, fuck everyone else.”

      The Americans I know aren’t like that.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

47 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!