President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 08, 2011 12:02 AM UTC

Interesting Redistricting Map Proposed By Latino Advocates

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Let a hundred flowers bloom, reports the Durango Herald’s Joe Hanel today:

Under the Hispanic groups’ plan, the Western Slope’s Congressman, Republican Scott Tipton of Cortez, would be drawn into the same district as Rep. Ed Perlmutter, a popular Democratic incumbent from Golden.

Meanwhile, the heavily Hispanic and Democratic areas of Pueblo and the San Luis Valley would leave the 3rd District and join the Eastern Plains.

That would mean trouble for state Rep. Sal Pace, D-Pueblo, who plans to challenge Tipton in the 3rd District…

Because of their high Hispanic populations, Pueblo and the San Luis Valley figure heavily in how the districts must be drawn. The federal Voting Rights Act does not allow map drawers to dilute the strength of minority voters.

State law and court precedents also call on Hyatt to make districts as compact as possible, preserve city and county lines if he can and keep intact “communities of interest” – a term whose meaning has been at the center of long debates this year.

The map proposal from the Colorado Latino Forum and the Colorado Hispanic Bar Association seems to be drawing more anger from Republicans than Democrats–speaking to the Lynn Bartels of the Denver paper, Sen. Greg Brophy, heavily involved in the GOP redistricting case, dissed the Latino map as not “serious.” It makes sense that Brophy doesn’t like this: the Latino map does make big changes to the status quo. And as you know, perhaps the most important breakthrough Democrats need to make in court is to defeat the obstinant GOP talking point that maps from 10 years ago should be subjected to “minimum change.”

The Latino map also, like Democratic proposals, places Rep. Mike Coffman in a very competitive district. Without speaking out of turn, we think it’s instructive to note Rep. Coffman’s bizarre Tom Tancredo-style campaign against bilingual ballots–not to mention Coffman’s more recent on-air nonsense about illegal immigrants being “rushed through” the citizenship process.

Safe to say, Coffman has not earned himself many friends in this community.

With all of this in mind, there are some issues with the Latino map that have been identified, most obviously the pairing of suburban Golden with the Western Slope in CD-3 described by Hanel above. In practical terms, taking Pueblo out of CD-3 removes a large Latino community from the only congressional district won by a Latino in the past decade.

Overall, though, we think this proposal will be useful food for judiciary thought–and an important voice added to the redistricting process. As with other signs that Latino political power in this state is growing, casually diss these maps at your peril, Sen. Brophy.

Comments

12 thoughts on “Interesting Redistricting Map Proposed By Latino Advocates

  1. The Reapportionement Commission only has two more scheduled meetings. One is on this coming Monday to discuss changes to the preliminarily approved HD and SD maps. These changes will be in response to the 25 public hearings they held around the state.

    The Commission staff should have the new maps they will be discussing on the Reapportionment Website either this evening or tomorrow.

    On Monday, Sept 19th, the Commission is scheduled to vote on a final plan which will be submitted to the Supreme Court for approval. The SC has until early Dec. to make objections or send it on to the SoS as THE map.

    This, of course, is barring any court cases challenging the final map. A lack of challenges would be pretty miraculous, be we could always hope.

    1. understand it, at least out in the hinterlands where I roam.  I provided the Commission with a new proposal for the Senate District in my area, because their proposed map is wrong, wrong, wrong for my county.  No one else from my county testified at the hearing held in my county – no one.  Even our legislators didn’t speak up, including the one who will lose my county under the Commission-proposed plan (I guess that means the incumbent doesn’t care about losing my county).  I sent my plan to newspapers in the counties that would be in my proposed District – heard from almost none of them, except the small town reporter who used me to explain the reapportionment process — after she had already covered the public hearing in her community.

      1. In the metro area there was very liely and packed public hearings. I went to the ones in Golden and Denver and both were heavily attended. Denver less so, I think more due to parking turning people off from going to the capitol.

        And at both meetings there was a unified voice on the local issues of concern. In Jeffco is was unnecassilarily inclduing a portion of Adams in one of the Senate Districts. In Denver, is was the dividing up of neighborhoods by the house districts.

        I have created a Denver HD map which makes relatively small changes to the proposed map, but reunites as many neighborhoods as possible. I have been working on this with one of the commissioners and I hope it is among the that are introduced for discussion on Monday.

  2. not to mention Coffman’s more recent on-air nonsense about illegal immigrants being “rushed through” the citizenship process.”

    I’m guessing Coffman figures what worked for Tanc all those years will work just as well for him and isn’t anticipating any major ethnic changes to CD6. Of course this is short sighted of almost all pols in our region as ethnic changes are coming, if not tomorrow, soon enough.

    Why such desperation in a district that, at worst, will go from safe R to more competitive, to appeal to the lowest common denominator base under the changing demographic circumstances that prevail in the US in general and even more here in Colorado?  Rs, all kinds, win easily here. Tancredo kept winning, not because he’s so extreme  but because he’s an R. This isn’t Colorado Springs.  We have plenty of moderate Rs and indies leaning that way.

    Without seeing all the specifics of the Latino map, if it makes Coffman sweat, it can’t be all bad.

    1. Rubio.

      Seriously, if you think “the Latino map” makes Coffman sweat even a drop, you’re dreaming. These maps are meaningless except to give the groups submitting them a little attention.

        1. that a growing Latino population statewide will be seen as a threat to “American” jobs and turn out conservative and frightened white voters if the economy is still in the doldrums in 2014. This isn’t about his congressional district, it’s about positioning himself as the true standard-bearer for the Senate race against Udall, and firing up the angry white vote is part of that strategy.

          1. Grumpy old bigots will be dying off while more Latino citizens who have just as much right as Americans to jobs as anyone else will be voting and will not be giving the bigots credit they don’t deserve for just being anti-illegal Latino.  We’ve recently elected three Democratic Senators including one named Salazar so this isn’t the kind of far right state where being the farthest rightie is what you need to do to win statewide elections.  My theory?  Coffman isn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer.  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

84 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!