President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 14, 2011 09:27 PM UTC

Washington Bipartisanship Teeters Again--Qui Bono?

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Our friends at the Washington Post with the latest:

“We’re not going to let our differences get in the way of coming together for solutions that help produce results,” Cantor tweeted on Thursday, the day of Obama’s jobs speech. “Need 2 work 2gether 4 results!” he tweeted later that day, making the same point in 30 characters.

Over the next few days, strange things happened: The hard-driving Cantor became Washington’s chief spokesman for togetherness. The above-it-all president demanded that Congress “Pass this bill.” Supercommittee members spoke optimistically about solving problems that have divided Washington for decades.

The two sides found small areas of agreement, such as tax cuts proposed in the president’s plan. But not much else…

As it stands now, Republicans appear to be hardening their overall position against the “American Jobs Act” after several days of temporizing and vaguely positive comments, citing its elimination of some tax credits used by wealthy Americans to pay for it. A familiar and increasingly risky objection, as Politico adds:

His approval ratings are low, but Congress is worse off, senior administration officials said Tuesday. House Republicans hold a 48-seat majority, but more than 60 of them will run in districts that Obama won in 2008 – and will contest heavily next year, the officials said. And while the tea party may loathe Obama’s plan, the coveted independent vote does not…

[T]he administration’s belief is fueling the White House game plan on jobs, an all-out effort by Obama, Cabinet officials and the Democratic campaign committees to push Republicans into an untenable political position that forces them to act on more than just minor elements of the president’s plan.

“If they don’t meet Obama halfway, a third of the way, a quarter of the way, they will risk losing the majority because they will be viewed as playing politics with jobs,” said John Anzalone, a Democratic pollster and consultant to candidates in the South.

We said previously that the best thing Republicans could do to blunt the political effectiveness of this jobs bill push from President Barack Obama is to co-opt it, and pass a bill sufficiently similar to Obama’s proposal to serve as a defense against the likely major 2012 complaint against them–obstruction for political purposes. Most of the bill based on our reading really is pretty uncontroversial, and despite the ideological brick wall in the House, the public has repeatedly expressed no objection to the modest revenue increases proposed to pay for it.

In short, it’s obviously a necessary move for Obama to push this legislation. The question is whether Republicans are better served by the obstruction they’ve used to devastating effect up to now in Obama’s term–or if we’re finally reaching a point of diminishing return.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Washington Bipartisanship Teeters Again–Qui Bono?

  1. Let me see if I’ve got this straight, the best thing Republicans can do is compromise the principles that got them elected, resulting in the biggest election victory in the House since 1948, and continues to deliver them victory after victory in special elections.

    If I were a Democrat spin doctor, this is exactly what I would tell Republicans to do. Thanks!

    1. They got elected on the principle of “No cuts to Medicare” and then voted to eliminate it about three weeks later as I recall.

      The rest of the principle-violating and promise-breaking is just gravy.

    2.  of very short term thinking :

      resulting in the biggest election victory in the House since 1948, and continues to deliver them victory after victory in special elections.

      and it will cost you and your conservative ilk dearly in the coming years. Nothing short of martial law by some nutball republican president will prevent the ultimate failure of your philosophy. Even then it will not prevail.

      The “Free Market Experiment” cannot succeed in a democracy.

      You are demographically doomed…and you know it.

       

        1. I repeat:

          You are guilty of very short term thinking.

          You and I both know that WASPs (also known as the Tea Party) are in the process of becoming a minority in this nation.

          I know that scares the hell out of you, and I know the writing is on the wall and you can read it.

          If you are suggesting the results of NY9 is an indicator that you are going to somehow prevent the eventual demise of your party, you are blind as well as misguided.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

124 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!