U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 03, 2011 10:48 PM UTC

Gardner on Cantor, Boehner, GOP Debt-Ceiling Infighting

  • 16 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

A very interesting and lengthy write-up this weekend in New York Magazine profiling the controversial GOP House Majority Leader Eric Cantor–a must read for anyone looking to gain insight into the workings of the new House majority.

With some interesting color commentary from Colorado’s own freshman Rep. Cory Gardner, talking about his relationship with Cantor as a candidate and the leadership role Cantor played working both with and against Speaker John Boehner during the recent debt-ceiling debate. Make sure you read the whole article, here are a few relevant excerpts:

Obama and other Democrats have never been as furious at Cantor as they were this past July during the debt-ceiling fight. For weeks, Obama had been negotiating with House Speaker John Boehner over a so-called “grand bargain” that would cut spending and raise taxes in exchange for a debt deal. But Cantor, who forcefully channeled tea-party Republicans’ opposition to any tax increase, had helped scuttle those talks. On a Wednesday afternoon, during a hiatus in the Obama-Boehner negotiations, a group of congressional leaders met for over two hours in the White House Cabinet Room, with Obama doing most of the arguing for the Democrats and Cantor for the Republicans. As the meeting was drawing to a close, Cantor and Obama repeated their arguments one final time-and then Obama erupted. “Eric, don’t call my bluff,” the president reportedly said. “I’m going to the American people with this.”

…Since the 2010 election, of course, Cantor has had a much more lethal weapon at his disposal, one that he played a major role in creating: the 87 freshmen who make up more than a third of the Republican’s House majority. In the run-up to the midterms, Cantor, along with McCarthy and Ryan, used their “Young Guns” candidate-recruitment program to find Republicans who could capitalize on the growing tea-party backlash against Obama and Washington. “We wanted to bring ’cause’ people to Congress,” says Ryan, “not people who were looking for political careers.”

The downside to recruiting non-career politicians is they don’t necessarily know how to run for office, so Cantor taught them the ropes. “He was always calling with advice,” says Cory Gardner, a freshman from Colorado. “I oftentimes wondered, now, surely he can’t call everybody because how much time does he have? But then I got to Congress, and I discovered that he was calling everybody.”

You might recall a few months ago when fellow Colorado freshman Rep. Scott Tipton indicated in an interview that his “trust” in Speaker John Boehner had been “damaged”–as a freshman in the lion’s den of Congress, one would assume that there was somebody else Tipton felt he could “trust,” right? Tipton and Boehner seem to have patched things up since then, but perhaps the above story from Gardner on Cantor’s helpfulness provides a clue? Here’s another as the New York Magazine story continues:

Cantor loyalists insist that his actions during the debt-ceiling negotiations were an attempt to help Boehner, not undermine him. “Eric was trying to save Boehner from himself,” says one congressman close to Cantor. Had Boehner agreed to a grand bargain with Obama, it would have sparked a revolt inside the GOP conference. As next in line-or “the conscience of the conference,” in the words of Colorado freshman Cory Gardner-Cantor would have been under tremendous pressure to challenge Boehner for the speakership. Some Cantor allies believe he could have won such a challenge…

That certainly leaves some questions unanswered: would Gardner have supported a “Grand Bargain” compromise like the one Boehner and Obama were negotiating? We know Tipton didn’t, and discounted the threat of default during the debt-ceiling fight, which would have earned him a spot among what Vice President Joe Biden called Cantor’s “Luddites” in this story.

But what about Gardner? It’s clear that Gardner was a member of Team Cantor based on the glowing assessment of the help he received during his campaign. But Gardner’s status as a full-on “Tea Party” obstructionist has always been a little less clear, ambiguity that “Cagey Cory” doesn’t really object to–especially with obstructionism going out of style. How much did Gardner approve of, or cooperate with, Cantor’s sabotaging of Boehner and the “grand bargain?”

Because this article implies quite a bit–perhaps more than Gardner has ever let slip about the internal GOP politics of the debt-ceiling debate. If the obstruction of 2011 doesn’t become a liability in 2012 for Republican freshmen, that’s one thing. But if it does, Gardner might find himself regretting even the guarded admissions he’s made in this story.

Tweet
Share

Comments

16 thoughts on “Gardner on Cantor, Boehner, GOP Debt-Ceiling Infighting”

  1. And the fact is, he is right. Boehner was saved from himself by the caucus’ rebellion, and if he had struck a “bargain” with Obama it might have been the end of his speakership. Cory played this right down the middle and was very smart with his public statements. If he supported Cantor behind the scenes to stop Boehner from doing something stupid, it makes him even smarter.

    2. … the first thing I wonder is whether I got stabbed by a smart guy. Wasn’t Cory also worried about the deficit? Or should I now take what you’re arguing as a warning not to believe anything Cory says publicly again?

      1. Of course Rep. Gardner is worried about the deficit. It’s one of the campaign planks that got him elected. Boehner is also worried about runaway spending and deficits. If anything, Boehner was giving Obama far too much credit by attempting to negotiate with him. Boehner is a good conservative but sometimes he forgets that Democrats are the enemy.

        I’m glad that Cantor was there to check him, and if Gardner helped, that’s even better. My whole point is that Gardner is very smart. He knows what to say and when, and he knows when to not give liberals smear campaign ammunition. I predict that Cory Gardner will be a thorn in Democrat’s sides for a long time.

        1. It’s that sort of balls-to-the-wall sentiment that makes it so likely congressional Republicans will try to find an actual solution to the deficit! By destroying the full faith and credit of the United States, if necessary! And by pretending to negotiate in good faith when all they really want to do is humiliate the other party! Because elections only have consequences when Republicans win, not when Democrats do! OK, got it.

        2. The problem, as this NY Mag article and countless others have noted, is that the radicalized House GOP is incapable of keeping the lights on.

          For freshmen like Scott Tipton, my anger is often tempered because I acknowledge the possibility that he very likely has no clue what he’s talking about. That’s not the case with Gardner because he is, as you point out, very smart.

          Bottom line is that you could’ve achieved a deficit reduction deal that was extremely favorable to Republicans, but it would’ve conceded a political ‘win’ for Obama, which is unacceptable these days. Cantor and Gardner were likely smart enough to undercut their Speaker, but not smart enough to do something for the country.

          1. Or maybe they just believe in their hearts that raising taxes in a recession is a bad idea. No matter how cynical you become, it would be wrong of you to totally discount the possibility.

            But of course you do anyway. Republicans can’t be human or you might not hate them so much.

            1. If anything the Tea Party caucus deserves is the benefit of the doubt, right?

              What I know is what is in the public record: Obama and Boehner were very close to a deal; Democrats and Republicans would’ve been furious with parts of it, but it could’ve passed had Boehner not had his throat slit. The collapse of the talks resulted in a credit downgrade, and everyone in DC took a dive in the polls, with Congress dipping near listeria levels. The resulting crisis in public confidence is now threatening the overall economy, and Republicans accustomed to blaming “uncertainty” for 9% unemployment are washing their hands.

              Cantor’s maneuvering is at the heart of all of this, and with his Abramoff background, I don’t think much of him or his motives. Gardner, until now, wasn’t letting on how much he knew about this dynamic. And yes, I hold him partly responsible.  

            3. cause these guys and they allies really got behind raising revenues (shoring up social security, investing in infrastructure, assisting education, etc., etc.) all during that last expansion  . . .

              Or maybe they just believe in their hearts that raising taxes in a recession is a bad idea

              . . . oh shit, is that being too cynical?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

75 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!