U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
January 10, 2022 03:24 PM UTC
13 Comments
I'm gonna send Coram some money. This is going to be a hell of a primary race.
Coram seems like a reasonable person, but let’s be honest: QBert is going to crush him because she is what Republicans want. She is what they all have become.
Here's a suggestion:
CD 3 Dems change their party affiliation to unaffiliated, vote in the GOP primary for Coram, change back to Dem or Unaff after the primary, and vote for the Dem nominee in November.
That way, they get the chance to vote against Q-bert twice if she should survive the primary.
It's about the only way CD-3 ever sees rational representation.
Coincidentally? . . .
. . . neither does she.
$200 Alex for 'What did she mean?"
Is Fluffy moonlighting as her Director of Tweets?
I hope Coram invests some time and money in developing responses to the likely babble of Boebert.
“I have no idea what that means” isn't bad … but it doesn't fully flip attention to point out he will be focused on being a public servant and NOT trying to come up with some sort of zinger phrase to tweet.
Is Perlmutter going to run for guv?
I'd be surprised if Ed wanted to pick a fight with his former delegation mate.
Yeah, right. It will be awhile, won't it?
It is Polis' office until he's termed out, oui?
"Woke" is a little like "judicial activism," which had an actual meaning at one time but long ago devolved into wingnutspeak for "I am a wingnut and I really, really dislike that ruling." The difference is that it's doubtful "woke" ever meant anything in this context other than "I am a wingnut and I really, really dislike that motherfucker."
From what I understand it was activist joking that people had just “woken” up despite them screaming about police abuse of power for years.
This Rip Van Winkle interpretation was abandoned by use of the right wing to say “woke” as why they are offended and acting like a crybaby.
New packaging for a toy – woke
New superhero movie – woke
Baseball/Football/Olympics – woke
Workplace training – woke
Menu options – woke
There isn’t anything that can’t be labeled woke to make being a crybaby seem ok in their mind. See also Moral Panic.