U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 20, 2012 10:16 PM UTC

Yes, Folks, They're Going To Waste Your Time

  • 19 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: See House Minority Leader Mark Ferrandino noting for the record how manifestly stupid this was, as highlighted by Media Matters’ Political Correction blog this afternoon (right):

As the body’s minority leader, Democrat Mark Ferrandino, explained, without cooperation from the Democrat-dominated state Senate, whose approval is needed to make Colorado’s call for an unprecedented constitutional convention official, the resolution amounts to “a letter to Santa Claus.”

—–

As the Durango Herald’s Joe Hanel reports:

State House members used their first vote of the year to pummel each other over a politically heated issue – repeal of President Barack Obama’s national health-care law.

House Resolution 1003 calls for a constitutional convention – America’s first since the days of Ben Franklin [Pols emphasis] – in order to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare…

The fight – the first floor debate of the 2012 session – was purely symbolic. It was a House-only resolution and did not seek approval from the Democratic-controlled Senate.

But, with at least four legislators running for Congress, the vote served as a reminder of how national politics will color the session. Minutes after the vote, the conservative group Compass Colorado was out with a news release headlined “Sal Pace Reiterates Support for Obamacare.”

We’ve already covered a number of utterly useless time-wasting pieces of legislation introduced this year by Republicans in the Colorado General Assembly–there’s Majority Leader Amy Stephens’ “Hickenlooper Gun Confiscation Prevention Act,” Sen. Greg Brophy’s welfare whiz-quiz bill, and the bid to reinstate the archaic Arveschoug-Bird spending limits of yesteryear. As silly and backward as these proposals may be, they at least affect some part of actual Colorado law–that is, the stuff Colorado legislators have some authority over.

This nonsensical resolution, asking for nothing short of a federal constitutional convention to repeal “Obamacare,” places the absurdity we can expect from this year’s General Assembly into a higher orbit. Even if you oppose the federal health reform bill passed in 2010, as some do, this is the kind of bug-eyed crazy talk you normally get from supporters of Lyndon LaRouche. And even if they had not envisioned a completely wacky “solution” in their resolution, didn’t we just reject a statewide “Obamacare repeal” initiative in 2010? So much for “the will of the voters?”

Anyway, here’s proof positive that those of you who predicted a session full of thoughtless partisan grandstanding over substance this election year…well, you’re right so far!

For good measure, a release from Protect Your Care Colorado follows debunking some of the wilder claims made yesterday about the Affordable Care Act. But this wasn’t about facts.

Hyper-partisan Hyperbole Dominates House Debate on Health Care Repeal Resolution

(Denver) – After a torrent of misleading statements about health care reform, the House passed a resolution today which called for a national constitutional convention to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

“Today’s resolution demonstrates how hyper-partisanship drowns solid facts and analysis about how health care reform is already helping thousands of Coloradans gain access to quality care.

What will Rep. Balmer and Speaker McNulty tell the 291,000 children who can no longer be denied coverage based on a preexisting condition? Or the 620,000 Colorado Medicare beneficiaries who now have access to free preventive care services like cancer screenings and mammograms?” said Courtney Law, spokesperson for Protect Your Care Colorado.

Top Five Misleading Statements Made Today about the Affordable Care Act

STATEMENT: Rep. Looper: Seniors will be hit hard by the Affordable Care Act.

FACT: 3.8 million Americans who hit the Medicare prescription drug “donut hole” received $250 tax-free rebates, and will likely receive a 50% discount on brand name prescription drugs when they hit the donut hole this year. By 2020, the law will close the donut hole completely. Taken together, the changes in the law will save seniors enrolled in traditional Medicare more than $3,500 over the next 10 years.

STATEMENT: Rep. Balmer: Federal health care reform will lead to job loss.

FACT: According to a 2011 Colorado Trust study, “In 2019, state economic output should be nearly 1% higher than it would be without reform and there will be roughly 19,000 new jobs as a result of the coverage expansion.”

STATEMENT: Rep. B. Gardner: The Affordable Care Act will lead to the rationing of health care.

FACT: Page 490 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act states,”(ii) The proposal shall not include any recommendation to ration health care.”

STATEMENT: Rep. Holbert: The Affordable Care Act will mean fewer people are covered.

FACT: The Congressional Budget Office estimated that 32 million more people will have insurance in 2019 because of the Affordable Care Act.

The Affordable Care Act has already helped 2.5 million additional young adults get health insurance

STATEMENT: Rep. Stephens: Families cannot afford the Affordable Care Act.

FACT: A recent study done by Families USA stated that, “On average, each household in Colorado will be $995 better off in 2019 due to the provisions of the Affordable Care Act.”

The Congressional Budget Office said the Affordable Care Act would save over $100 billion over the next ten years, and over $1 trillion in the following decade.

###

Comments

19 thoughts on “Yes, Folks, They’re Going To Waste Your Time

  1. passing this resolution has already created another 15,312 new Colorado jobs!  We’ve only just begun!  Way to go Frankencrew!

    (Just saving MittaBOT the mental effort . . . he’s reportedly confused today.)

  2. I’m not sure anyone can take the high ground here — there are those on both sides who are pros at wasting time.

    [To the legalization lobby:  Before you clutter up my ballot, go talk to Congress and get it legalized at the federal level.  Then, come talk to me.]

      1. legalization of marijuana is a pretty silly non-issue when you contrast it to the sober, and rather serious nature of the Protect-Amy-Stephens-Legislative-Career-Act  

    1. I’m perfectly fine with people going to the ballot with wacky proposals. When a part-time legislature gets bogged down with bills pitched entirely toward partisan messaging instead of actual policy, that’s detrimental to the state in a long-term structural way.

      Worse, counting votes in the legislature is relatively easy to do and if you’re guaranteed to come up woefully short, it would be better for everyone to move on to something else. I suspect marijuana legalization is going to fail, but that depends on the mood of the electorate and that’s trickier to judge in advance. At least getting on the ballot is just wasting the time of organizers and petitioners outside of using a portion of the SoS’s resources, while legislators are working on the taxpayer’s dime.

    2. rather than legalization (a problem obviously better suited to congress) we should limit this to what the states are allowed to do.

      So, we should be talking about decriminalizing possession if less than an ounce for persons over the age of 21 . . . to a non-reportable misdemeanor with a maximum fine of, say, $10.  

      1. and make it cost more to have less than an oz. Encourage folks to stock up when it is available rather than going onto the street when they’re down to seeds and stems. And, for crying out loud make sales legal 7 days a week

    3. but it’s pretty telling that AMWAY won’t condemn the silliness of the Repubs.

      “I want to step really really carefully and make it sound like there is equivalent wrong doing without actually condemning the waste our taxpayer money Republicans.  God knows I will never condemn Republicans for political stunts that don’t create jobs.”

    4. Can you give me a specific example of Democrats wasting taxpayer money on as egregious political stunts as this one?

      Since you made these broad sweeping generalizations can you back it up with one example?

      1. besides Arapajoke to post on Pols, it looks like it is going to be more of the same sophomoric silliness of false equivalence arguments.

        What a lying piece of shit AmyCO to say that Republicans are the same as Democrats in terms of wasting taxpayer money on useless agendas and then not provide one example to back up your claims.  Also what happened to Republicans being better than Democrats.  Isn’t it an insult to say that Republicans are no better than Democrats in wasting taxpayer money.  Dog shit has better consistency than your runny commentary.

  3. So, Republicans don’t want universal health insurance. They want poor people to stay sick so they can infect others. They want people without insurance to go to the emergency room for more expensive healthcare.

    They also want to let insurance companies deny you insurance, or drop you. Free enterprise?

    This is going to look really bad for them at election time.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

153 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!