President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 25, 2012 12:37 AM UTC

Brophy, Renfroe Antics Supply Primary Disclosure Bill Laugh Track

  • 19 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Senate Bill 12-014 clears up a small problem we’ve been talking about for, well, too long:

In conformity with the 2011 change of the primary election date from August to the last Tuesday in June, the schedule under the “Fair Campaign Practices Act” for making campaign finance disclosures in connection with the primary election is changed to the second Monday in May and on specified Mondays thereafter until the primary election.

SB12-014 fixes the glitch in primary campaign finance reporting created by a failure to change this date when the date for the primary election was moved up from August to June last year. This is the same legislative error that Secretary of State Scott Gessler tried to unsuccessfully exploit to eliminate the biweekly disclosures required immediately before the primary. When his attempt failed, Gessler published a new rule last month that would have forced these reports to begin this month–months ahead of the intention of the law, and purely as a spiteful gesture.

So it’s completely fine, and in fact necessary due to Gessler’s spiteful behavior, that the legislature move quickly to fix the dates involved, and allow these reports to serve their intended purpose of timely disclosure–without imposing an onerous and unintended burden.

Despite this, a few Republicans were determined to make a scene: maybe to run cover for Gessler, but we don’t really get that as everyone in the building understood the issue. Nonetheless, Sen. Scott Renfroe angrily Tweeted after the bill passed today:

Sad day in the Colorado Senate…First bill Democrats bring up to pass is bill to fix politicians red tape…not to help citizens or business in Colorado. Senator Brophy made great motion to lay over bill to do people’s business first…it failed.

We have to assume Sen. Renfroe simply didn’t look at the bill to see that it’s co-sponsored by Republican Sen. Ellen Roberts, making the rhetoric about this “Democrat bill” appear kind of ridiculous. But it gets even better when we turn to that motion from Sen. Greg Brophy.



Can’t see the audio player? Click here.

Thank you Madame Chair. Members, this really is an important bill to pass this legislative session because we actually have statutes that are in conflict with each other, one where we’re supposed to report something at one time and another where we’re supposed to start reporting in a different manner, at a time that’s in conflict with that. And the assistant secretary of state, Mr. Hobbs, came in and explained this to us very clearly in legislative legal services, and they had tried to draft a rule that allowed us to live within the bounds of all of the statutes, not just one particular section, subsection B as I recall in that particular part of the statutes.

But my real problem with this bill is it’s going to be the first bill that passes through the Colorado State Senate this year. And members, I think that sends the wrong message to the people of Colorado, to the hardworking men and women who are trying to run their businesses and do their jobs out in the state of Colorado: that with all the bureaucratic red tape that we can cut, the only bureaucratic red tape that we’ll actually get to work on immediately in the Colorado state senate is red rape cutting that will benefit politicians. Because those are the only people in Colorado who are gonna benefit from the immediate and rushed passage of this bill. The red tape that we’re gonna cut benefits only politicians.

So therefore Madame Chairman, I pulled out my Senate calendar, it’s on everybody’s desk, it was delivered to everybody’s desk, and I will therefore make a motion that we lay this bill over until February 28th, for second reading which will be the second to last day before bills are calendared to pass out of the Senate, so we can send a message to the people of Colorado that yeah, we care about cutting red tape, but we’re gonna cut your red tape first, and not our red tape first. I move that this bill lay over until February 28th.

Get it? Gessler’s revised rule would have required primary disclosure reports to begin this month–that’s why this bill was necessary to get passed early in the session. But it also gave Sen. Brophy this wonderful opportunity to pointlessly bash his fellow Senators, while proposing something that would defeat the sole purpose of the legislation! While it’s true that anybody even remotely paying attention to the issue will see through this shallow grandstanding, Brophy is counting on a low-information talk radio bubble in which to trumpet his silly actions.

And you know what? He’ll probably get one.

Tweet
Share

Comments

19 thoughts on “Brophy, Renfroe Antics Supply Primary Disclosure Bill Laugh Track”

  3. I must have missed the outrage (from the Senate Minority) when House Republicans first piece of business this year was a ceremonial resolution against ACA.  Not to mention the House Majority wanted to get to Democratic candidates for Congress on the record on this issue.    

  4. Because you’re right, to the average man on the street, racing to prevent politicians from having to file “unintended” disclosure reports instead of racing to help their business succeed looks bad. Brophy was right to call the Senate on it. I hope it winds up in a mail piece.

    Politicians don’t need less paperwork, citizens do! I’ll take that slogan to the bank.

    2. Who do you think are the campaign treasurers for most Colorado candidates?

      They tap their family CPA, or bookkeeper, or banker, or someone else with some financial chops. These good people do it on a volunteer basis, taking time away from their own small businesses to do so.

      What Gessler tried to do was put a huge regulatory burden on small business people who volunteer to keep track of campaign finance in local and legislative races. They’re not paid to do so.

      Why do you hate Colorado small business?

      1. Over the last few years the state has shifited the burden of paying for an education at our public colleges and universities from two-thirds paid by the state and one-third by the student to just the opposite. We are quickly making it unaffordable for in-state students to go on for a degree.

        Many who do will soon graduate with a degree and a mortgage (student loans) that will make purchasing a house by the very people who, in the past, could most afford it impossible and thus depress the real estate market. The Republicans who almost universally favor additional cuts in higher education need to remember there are consequences.  

        2. My kid got accepted by CU today. We/he will have to pay $25,000 for in-state tuition, room, board, etc. $25,000 for in-state tuition, etc. How on earth can mere mortals like us afford that?

        3. My kid got accepted by CU today. We/he will have to pay $25,000 for in-state tuition, room, board, etc. $25,000 for in-state tuition, etc. How on earth can mere mortals like us afford that?

        4. are well aware how tough it will be for them if poor people can continue to get educated. Wasn’t it ol’ Thomas Jefferson himself that spoke of the power of an educated and informed populace?

          Such an educated populace is anathema to the aims of the corporate aristocracy.

          Thanks for your always thoughtful contributions to this site. You are living proof that conservatives can actually have a heart, just like Ike.  

            1. nowadays the terms “republican” and “liberal” are antonyms. Even Nixon, I think, wouldn’t pass muster as a republican.

              I mean, he was as criminal as he needed to be, but he did raise taxes and he didn’t hate China.

              It’s just all too confusing, Mommy…  đź™‚

  5. Renfroe is sponsoring/co-sponsoring nine bills this session (less two honorific joint resolutions). Two bills have marginal business implications:

    SB12-076: Prohibits CDOT from excluding inexperienced contractors from bidding on state transportation projects.

    SB12-088: Reinforces the authority of the state to regulate the oil and gas industry.

    Seriously, Mr. Renfroe, that’s what you’ve got?

    I’m tracking and rating 28 state bills related to the state’s startup and technology sectors. Half of those introduced thus far are largely worthless exercises in partisan chest thumping.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

59 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!