U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
February 02, 2012 11:09 PM UTC
22 Comments
How will ArapaGOP explain this away?
Speaking of which, anybody seen him lately? He kind of vanished after the Bradford thing took a nosedive…
ducking for cover? #armed&dangerous
Mittens sure has been fucking up a lot since winning Florida. And, as the Voice of the GOP here at pols, I think the Bradford scandal must have the GOP Communications Center in a tizzy. He can’t come and say anything until they figure out their spin.
with the Hive. They go mute and lifeless.
I’ve been busy, but not with that. But I have a few things to say about the extreme Democrat hypocrisy and shameless powermad lack of morals on display at the Capitol. I’ll write it in the appropriate thread.
we’ve been breathlessly waiting those talking points: “extreme hypocrisy” . . . “shameless power-mad lack of morals” . . . I’ve got to say it’s suprising, and honestly quite refreshing, to see the GOPers being so forthright in assessing the actions of their west-slope Representative . . .
It was reprogramming so that they can beam their talking points directly into your cerebral cortex? I always knew that Republicans were ahead of the curve in brainwashing techniques.
along not heard from rightie or two showed up again?
This is not going to be a problem just for Romney but for many Rs longing to extol successful enterprises only to find the rightie love object inconveniently owing much of its success to awful, terrible, no good stimulus funds. This will be especially problematic when said enterprise’s work is connected to one of those alphabet soup outfits that are such a useless waste of space in the GOP playbook.
And speaking of Romney, shouldn’t he be a little concerned about them? Maybe concerned about getting as many of them as possible out of poverty and into good jobs so they can be contributors to a healthier economy? And how does he think he’s going to fix any “holes” in that spiffy safety net, the one he thinks makes the poor just as well set as the rich, with policies that cut spending on, you know, all the safety net stuff.
He’s got some serious ‘splainin to do on a whole bunch of stuff, including on what evidence he bases his constant whining about Obama as a weak leader appeasing and apologizing in the international arena. If the very rich are doing so well that he’s not concerned about them either, why the constant push for more breaks for them? If his primary concern is the mif middle class, why does he want them to pay a higher percentage of their income in all kinds of taxes than the just fine rich?
But he can start with why the stimulus funds were a bad thing for Springs Fabrication, while he’s in the neighborhood.
To answer your question he will invoke, Rule 109, change the subject, Rule 106, lie, lie, lie and most especially Rule 105, it doesn’t matter what you said yesterday, it didn’t happen if it’s inconvenient today.
and don’t pull it out until the coast is clear.
and extoll the benefits of free enterprise in a place that is 75% government supported. He has the arrogant liar part down to a tee.
Unfortunately for the GOP, it is true.
They confuse the two.
That Obama sure is sneaky to make sure this awesome cutting edge tech company in the Springs accepted $2.4mm in successful stimulus funding just to embarrass any incautious R candidate who happened by int he next election cycle.
Clearly, that Lamborn-tar-baby-thing has some truth to it. Sneaky, sneaky, sneaky.
the owners are rock ribbed Republicans who hate government so he should be in good company.
You can’t waive $2.3 million under a capitalist’s nose and not expect him to bite.
Springs Fabrication is a good size company, this was probably a drop in he bucket for them. It doesn’t hurt Romney at all. Romney will sail to a huge win in the caucuses next Tuesday.
That’s what I’ve been busy working on!
on the easy stuff?
signed — joker veteran
with no stimulus funds. But I guess that’s just the Democrat in me…
then they shouldn’t have needed it.
What kind of freeloaders live in Welfare City and scarf up tax money that they don’t need? Have they no shame.
Are you assuming that the R caucus goers are sober and armed? or DUI/GUI? I think it makes a difference.
And you meant “non-binding caucuses” right? That’s what Fox News is correctly calling them.
Now you’re just arguing over their price.