President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 28, 2022 02:28 PM UTC

The Sad Self-Flagellation Of Pam Anderson

  • 5 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

We’ve written a few times now about the curious case of former Jefferson County Clerk Pam Anderson, running as a Republican–but not that kind of Republican–to be Colorado’s next chief elections officer. Attempting to occupy a middle lane that doesn’t exist anymore after the 2020 presidential election created two mutually incompatible partisan realities, Anderson’s message as expressed on her website is an embarrassing self-conscious contortion, trying to sound persuasive without acknowledging the 800-pound gorilla in the room:

There is absolutely no one spreading this “rumor.” But thanks for clearing up a question no one asked! As a Republican who is running to be Colorado’s chief elections official, it’s only natural to expect that Anderson would start off establishing clearly that there’s no truth whatsoever to Trump’s contention that the 2020 election was stolen. After all, that’s Anderson’s whole contrarian message for the general election: vote for me because I’m a “good Republican” who doesn’t buy the “Big Lie.”

Unfortunately, at least on her website, Anderson isn’t willing to actually challenge the “Big Lie” that the 2020 election was stolen. You can see above how she sidesteps the issue, claiming that “people of good conscience” have “concerns.”

Except that’s not what’s going on. Republicans believe a lie, and that lie is indeed villainous.

But after coddling the “Big Lie’s” devoted yet misguided true believers, then Anderson delivers the hard truth, right? She says unequivocally at least once somewhere among all of these words that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election fair and square–right?

Sorry! The closest you get anywhere is this mealy-mouthed mumbo jumbo about how Dominion Voting Systems is based in America. It’s another example of Anderson side-stepping a question she could easily answer. Despite the hope that Anderson would be a vehicle of reason within the GOP, we see now that she doesn’t have the courage to actually challenge the foundational lie of today’s Republican Party. Anderson is aware that a majority of Republican voters do not agree with her, and a large percentage of those voters don’t care about anything else. Anderson is telegraphing her fear of the Republican base.

Someday it’s entirely possible that Anderson will say the words uttered by so many wistful ex-Republicans: “I didn’t leave the Republican Party, the Republican Party left me.” And that will probably be the truth. But that truth still leaves Pam Anderson with no viable path in the 2022 Secretary of State’s race as a Republican.

It’s simply not Pam Anderson’s party anymore. Whether she admits it or not is irrelevant.

Comments

5 thoughts on “The Sad Self-Flagellation Of Pam Anderson

  1. In November and December 2020, Mitt Romney said that the Republicans are not helping the-election-was-stolen crowd by indulging them in their fantasies. 

  2. Hold, the phone, alert CNN, front page news!

    A politician does not lead with a message that will turn off some of her voters. How unusual, how unexpected, how extraordinary.

    This diary is bullshit. Yeah, she skirts around an issue where she wants a significant number of the voters to vote for her in spite of her stance on that issue. So she talks about the other stuff.

    She’s not lying which puts her ahead of most politicians.

  3. Looking forward to hear how Ms. Anderson will "answer" the "people of good conscience" with questions about election processes. And then, we can learn what she does with people like her opponent Tina Peters and her supporters, who have certainties about the election process.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

315 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!