President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
February 24, 2012 09:33 PM UTC
24 Comments
Pulling some women off the street and forcing abortions on them. The nerve!
The truth is out there whether the Enyarts or Newt if-You-Quote-Me-In-Context-It’s-Still-a-Lie Gingrich like it ot not. Facts don’t have a liberal bias. Repugs just make it seem as though they do.
without censorship.
That doesn’t account for illegal abortions in countries where women/children are stoned to death for being raped. Africa sees an estimated total of 5 million illegal abortions every year. American lady jail, or Somalian militant justice? Maybe women just think differently than I do.
I don’t suppose it would help to point out where abortions, legal or not, decrease, would it? I’ll give a hint: the countries have mostly free health care and wide access to birth control in common.
I’m all for saving babies. So let’s save babies. Socialist health care for everybody! (Is that redundant?)
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs…
1. Enyart speaks for himself, no one else.
2. Enyart has the right and obligation to defend his copyrights.
3. This isn’t your first copyright problem, is it Pols? Maybe you’re the ones who should be careful.
It’s funny to me that you have such an issue with that and assign it to something/one else when no one else did. He says the bill is fine, but has a different idea of “fine” than 3/4 of the state. Blog didn’t force him to testify.
YouTube policy doesn’t mirror copyright law exactly. Nice threatening anyway. If you’d like to explain how this is a “copyright problem”, please look over the law and feel free to do so. I’m sure the random blog you can’t stop masturbating on would love your unqualified advice.
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/f…
or it wouldn’t be getting scrubbed, would it, ArapG?
The fact is, only anti-abortion candidates need apply in today’s GOP but they are all scared to death of being cornered into answering a simple question: What do they think the penalty for women should be if they get their way and abortion becomes illegal?
But I get it. You’ve got your whistling past the graveyard spin orders to follow. Talk about lame. The farther to the extreme wacko right your clown car inmates force each other to go, the better Obama does against any and all of them in polls. Waah!
putting someone to death for having an abortion makes sense to someone who thinks he’s pro-life.
http://www.coloradopols.com/di…
Enyart’s a polster? Libertad???
B) This doesn’t prove Enyart is a Polster. He may or may not be.
and
3 – something else.
Always good to hear from you!
Would be my better guess.
that FPEs shouldn’t be speculating on peoples’ identities.
Idiocy speaks for itself. No need to delve further.
Who knows if anyone there even has a registered account, much less which? Someone is reading Pols who has a relationship to this “gentleman,” clearly. I work in social media myself, and typically at that type of organization, monitoring of blogs is a task assigned to interns. I’m merely expressing my doubt that Bob Enyart, who favors the death penalty for women who get abortions, is personally monitoring Pols for mentions of himself.
Google was no help.
for rotating guest front page editors who are elected by fellow posters. You probably couldn’t find it with the google because the site’s hegemony doesn’t extend all that far.
ArapaGOP (and JeffcoGOP, DougcoGOP and the rest of your brethren) can kiss the suburban Republican woman vote goodbye with this crap. You never learn, do you?
unaffiliated over recent cycles. I know plenty of them. Quite a few live within a couple of blocks of me in a neighborhood that used to lean heavily R but is now closer to even thirds of U first then R then D. Used to be R first and the Us who were mainly R lite, with Ds seriously trailing. Not so much anymore. Some of their husbands have switched, too. Some of the Us have gone all the way to D. This is a south suburban neighborhood where people mainly see themselves as pretty moderate and not terribly partisan or tuned in to politics and in the 80s and 90s skewed heavily R in their voting. They’ve gone for many Ds at various levels in cycles since.
Bear that in mind when you see polls showing support among R women for whatever. Many of the ones who would be against are no longer R women at all and the remaining group of R women are more conservative than R women on average used to be.
Probably all of them, if there are many universes. I wonder a lot about what goes through the collective GOP’s head. Do they think eggmendments failed because they didn’t go far enough? Have they not put the fall in suburban birth rates and birth control together? Maybe they think women aren’t putting out because they’re sick to death of working instead of being barefoot and pregnant for half their lives. Until men fix it, I’ll tell you what.
Aren’t you supposed to be enjoying the weekend? Step away from the keyboard (while humming “Bad Cat, bad Cat, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when the internet weekend police come for you?”).
Thanks, breather