As the Durango Herald’s Joe Hanel reports:
The Senate gave final approval to a bill that funds an increase in per diem pay for rural lawmakers Wednesday morning on a 21-13 vote…
Three Republicans and 10 Democrats voted no on HB 1301, including Senate President Brandon Shaffer, D-Longmont, who had been a co-sponsor.
“This does not impact my pay, and I support additional help for our rural lawmakers, but I’m voting ‘no’ because, right now, with our severe budget issues, I feel it’s just not the right time,” Shaffer said in a prepared statement.
He is running for Congress in the Eastern Plains district. One of the Republican ‘no’ votes came from Sen. Kevin Lundberg, R-Berthoud, who is running for Congress in the northern Front Range district.
We have been clear from the beginning on two important facts about this story: first, our agreement that legislators are underpaid, and second, that the disastrous handling of this bill in the GOP-controlled House made the the issue of raising legislative per diem toxic. The absolute worst way to have handled this in-effect request of taxpayers for higher compensation was to try to ram it through with no debate. This confirms a lesson we have tried to inculcate in our readers for years: you will never, ever make a negative story go away by hiding it.
Fortunately for Democrats, whether by better insight or simply watching the situation explode in House Speaker Frank McNulty’s lap, the Democratic Senate had a much more open debate about the need to raise legislative per diem. Senate Majority Leader John Morse, who we’ve been critical of for his brusque handling of questions about this, publicly took ownership of the political unpopularity. With that in mind, it was still very wise for Senate President Brandon Shaffer to remove his name from the bill and vote no–and it’s worth noting Sal Pace’s vote against in the House. In the end, considerably more Republicans voted for House Bill 1301 in both chambers than Democrats, and that may be the best yardstick for electoral utility/risk.
One additional point we feel obligated to make: there is perhaps no one we are more sympathetic to in this story than state employees who did not get a raise, per diem or salary–and haven’t in four years. Not minor-celebrity legislators who may or may not deserve special treatment, but snowplow drivers, nurses, corrections officers, people who care for the disabled, employees at the state mental health facility in Pueblo. State workers have taken the legislature’s budget cuts in the teeth for four years–pay cuts, furloughs, shrinking resources to do their job–and if they complain, some Republicans call them “scum.”
Anyway, we hope they’ve been paying vote-by-vote attention. We suspect they have.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: dawn flowers
IN: Thornton Mayor Jan Kulmann Vaguely Afraid of Some Guy
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Tony Daly
IN: Colorado Republicans Cruised Past Parody and Kept Right on Going
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Dave Williams’ Foes Head Back To Court As “Calvinball” Drama Continues
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Colorado Republicans Cruised Past Parody and Kept Right on Going
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Child Actor Ricky Schroder Crashes Tina Peters Trial
BY: davebarnes
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: davebarnes
IN: Colorado Republicans Cruised Past Parody and Kept Right on Going
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Colorado Republicans Cruised Past Parody and Kept Right on Going
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Trump Sets GOP Race Relations Back To Stone Age, Thrilling Lauren Boebert
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Your spins works both ways at a minimum.
http://www.coloradopeakpolitic…
To answer a question posed earlier, I am not associated with Colorado Peak Politics in any way. But I find them a refreshing counterpoint to the nonstop Democrat spin from Colorado Pols. If nothing else, Colorado needs both.
I just lost ten bucks.
But here’s audio your boy McNulty cutting off a staffer before he can tell the Executive Committee of the Legislative Council about the per diem increase.
They knew what was in it, of course, but he knew the audio was going out live to the taxpayers.
http://www.junctiondailyblog.c…
I hadn’t heard that yet. That’s fucking awful, and totally obvious as advertised.
Really Beavis? Holding on to that Public Urination story aren’t they? If you shake a public urination story more than 3 times, you’re playing with it.
The Peak Politics post highlights one of the great things about Democrats. They are way better at thinking for themselves than Republicans and it seems like the author is poking at the Dems for not acting like GOP puppets who’s decisions are either made by GOP leaders or Super PAC donors.
from government, except when the money is sent to them.
is it correct to say that this is a result of a desire on the part of the legislature for a more thorough and uniform method of funding the rural members?
Good then.
Third reading yesterday. It had already passed the House.
I think all you can say is that it is the result of a desire on the part of many legislators to put more money in their own pockets.