President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 11, 2022 02:17 PM UTC

In Which Boebert Hugs Her Own Scandals A Bit Too Tightly

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

We’re not even sure what it was specifically in reference to, another culture-war petrol bomb chucked into the Twitterverse by freshman GOP outrage transshipment agent Rep. Lauren Boebert this weekend because, well, it was Saturday:

As our readers and anybody who wants to do the Googling to discover knows, there’s a small problem with Boebert condemning anybody on this planet for sexual “grooming” behavior. It’s actually not a small problem, in fact it’s a very large problem, consequentially if not physically. And for whatever reason, yesterday’s random outburst from Boebert has provoked an unusually high-profile clapback reminding Boebert of the nature of her problem:

In response to Boebert’s Tweet decrying the “far left’s” “grooming bullcrap,” Boebert was treated to hundreds upon hundreds of responses linking to the Salon story from last August that thoroughly documented Jayson Boebert’s conviction for public indecency after exposing his genitals to young women at a bowling alley in western Colorado in 2004. It wasn’t the first story on that incident, but it remains the most thorough and highest-circulation retelling.

By now you’re probably asking yourself if you haven’t already: what kind of idiot would invite this withering re-examination of their own record upon themselves by accusing their opponents of something they themselves carry as baggage?

The answer, as we’ve explored a few times, is that Boebert deliberately chooses lines of attack that closely parallel her own scandals as a strategy to confound her critics. Sexual impropriety is just one particularly lurid among many such examples, including Boebert’s payday loans out of her campaign account and railing against the January 6th insurrection investigation Boebert is more or less a target of.

It’s a strategy that works for awhile, like it often did for Donald Trump, until it doesn’t.

And on the issue of “grooming” kids, it has stopped working for Lauren Boebert.

Comments

7 thoughts on “In Which Boebert Hugs Her Own Scandals A Bit Too Tightly

    1. Speaking of #EmptyG: 

      NEW: Marjorie Taylor Greene just said the US should stop sending military aid to Ukraine and let them be invaded because Russia will “inevitably” win and the conflict is “affecting trade around the world.”

       

    2. I'm thinking there needs to be a bit more that what I know (tweeting something like "this is 1776" and "Pelosi has been moved out") before clearly labeling Boebert an insurrectionist.  

      Now, if she has a role that gets mentioned in the soon-to-be January 6 hearings or report … it would make sense. 

  1. Ms. Boebert and her colleagues on the far right are confused. One doesn't "groom" another person to be gay. It's either in their genetic makeup or it isn't. One can, however, groom a young person to be a racist, a church-goer, a person who donates to people in need, etc. There, it's all in how one is brought up by their parents. 

    1. That is also the answer to Ted Cruz’ famous question.

      Q:  Do you think babies are born racist, Judge Jackson?

      A:  No senator, they are not born racist. They learn that from their parents.

  2. I'm so confused. I remember all those "No Hippies and Longhairs" signs from the 60s and 70s. I thought the right hated the far left because they didn't groom their children?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

183 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!