President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 27, 2022 02:13 PM UTC

"Security Risk"--GOP Leadership Blasted Boebert Post-January 6th

  • 9 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Rep. Lauren Boebert (R).

Another round of shocking disclosures today in the New York Times from the authors of the forthcoming book This Will Not Pass: Trump, Biden, and the Battle for America’s Future, revelations from which have upended intra-Republican politics by demonstrating the extent of division within Republican leadership in the immediate aftermath of the violent insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, 2021 seeking to disrupt the certification of Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 presidential elections.

Houser Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s credibility was severely damaged in the first round of reporting about these discussions when his blanket denials were countered with audio proving the Times’ reporting was accurate. In that first story, it was also reported that McCarthy and his leadership team were not just angry with Donald Trump, but a number of fellow members of Congress who had helped incite the rioters leading up to and on the day of January 6th including Colorado’s GOP freshman tempest in a Teapot Dome Rep. Lauren Boebert.

Today, the Times has more details from those discussions–and Boebert can’t possibly be happy:

In the phone call with other Republican leaders on Jan. 10, Mr. McCarthy referred chiefly to two representatives, Matt Gaetz of Florida and Mo Brooks of Alabama, as endangering the security of other lawmakers and the Capitol complex. But he and his allies discussed several other representatives who made comments they saw as offensive or dangerous, including Lauren Boebert of Colorado and Barry Moore of Alabama.

The country was “too crazy,” Mr. McCarthy said, for members to be talking and tweeting recklessly at such a volatile moment…

According to today’s story, Republican leadership went through a list of Republican members of Congress who had made statements in the leadup to January 6th that could be reasonably construed as inciting or at least morally supporting the violence that ensued that day. Since January of 2021, the only participant in these calls who has remained consistent about what happened is Rep. Liz Cheney–who as readers know was ousted from leadership just weeks after this phone call after McCarthy and most of the Republican Party went crawling back to Trump.

But on January 10th, it was Liz Cheney who called out Lauren Boebert by name, and no one disagreed:

On the leadership call, Mr. McCarthy, Mr. Scalise and others discussed several other lawmakers who had made provocative comments around Jan. 6, including Mr. Moore and Representative Louie Gohmert of Texas. Ms. Cheney, who was on the call, suggested Ms. Boebert was a security risk, pointing out that she had publicly tweeted about the sensitive movements of other lawmakers during the Jan. 6 evacuation. [Pols emphasis]

There’s been tremendous debate since January 6th, 2021 about whether Rep. Boebert’s Tweet in the midst of rioters storming the U.S. Capitol announcing that Speaker Nancy Pelosi had been removed from the House chambers was a deliberate attempt to provide intelligence to the rioters, or just an incredibly foolish but not malicious breach of operational security. During this call on January 10th, we can see that Boebert’s actions were being taken deadly seriously by Republican leaders with the trauma of the insurrection still fresh in everyone’s minds.

There are probably few people in this country who have been more personally burned by Rep. Lauren Boebert’s treacherous embrace of Trump’s assault on democracy than Rep. Cheney, who in 2020 hosted a fundraiser for Boebert and embraced her as an up-and-coming regional star. As for Boebert? She’s not available for comment to reporters, but she’s full of cryptic piss and vinegar on Twitter:

If McCarthy does survive what should be these caucus-rending leadership-ending revelations, it’s because Boebert and the MAGA wing of the party have already won. McCarthy prostrated himself before Trump not long after he was caught on tape calling for Trump to resign, and then helped purge Rep. Cheney from leadership when Cheney wouldn’t go along. Nothing changed between January 6th and McCarthy’s subsequent about face except the will to oppose Trump within the GOP, even after the horror of insurrection inside the U.S. Capitol, simply evaporated.

Except for the audio, folks. Audio is forever.

Comments

9 thoughts on ““Security Risk”–GOP Leadership Blasted Boebert Post-January 6th

  1. What unites the right is stronger than what divides us. We learn from our mistakes.

    We will defeat socialism first and then debate among ourselves.

    1. You haven't learned from your mistakes post 2016.

      You doubled down on that mistake in fact.  And while you use the straw man of socialism, The Reich, er, I mean "right" brings us closer to fascism.  By electing actual fascists.

      Case in point, that bitch your wife works for that you're here defending.

    2. Defeat socialism?  Are you taking down the rural electrics? The local co-op? The local cooperative telephone associations?  The Post Office?  Farm subsidy payments? 

  2. And yet the Democratic House majority has done nothing, as far as I can see, to open an Ethics Committee investigation of Boebert or any other member who may have been involved in planning the insurrection, who may have cooperated with the plan to instigate it, or who may have compromised the security of Congress and the Capitol. 

    It is a disgrace that there has been zero effort to hold these men and women, who may well have violated their oaths and federal law, to account, even to the minimal extent of the House of Representatives' own ethics requirements.

    It is too soon to say whether Boebert and the others named in this new book are, in fact, guilty of ethics violations. But it is certainly not too soon to investigate in order to find out. 

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

299 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!