U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
May 10, 2022 09:20 AM UTC
14 Comments
The Bruce D. Benson Center for the S
tudyPoorly Attempted Overthrow of Western CivilizationFixed it
This is a good time to remind everyone to send a little love to Whiskey Lima Juliet. I’d pay a lot to see her go toe-to-toe with Eastman.
Oh my goodness! Oh please, yes, please! I would also love this. I have questions.
Whiskey lady is great but Eastman is no longer at CU.
But there's still some clean-up to complete on aisle 7 – another way of saying we need to ensure that an embarrassment like Eastman never again happens at CU.
I disagree. Part of being a great university is fostering a wide diversity of thought. Sometimes that results in a Ward Churchill or an Eastman. So what? Would you prefer Heidi Ganahl and Krysten Sinema marked the boundaries of acceptable thought?
John Eastman used the resources of a publicly funded university to promote and in an attempted coup of the United States of America. C.U. either did not know about this or tried to bury it. Neither is acceptable.
It's not really news that Eastman was abusing various universities' email systems, either. That is, after all, at the center of the lawsuit filed by the Jan. 6th Committee; Eastman also misused his Chapman University email to run his Big Lie scheme.
We didn't know for sure that Eastman was working for Trump on CU's dime until now, though.
It lends credibility to the effort to get rid of the bogus and embarrassing "Conservative Scholar" program through Cu's Benson Center. Eastman's replacement at CU has an opus out: "Why Steve Bannon is not a Fascist". MMkay.
Bannon is not a fascist because he’s too far right to be a fascist.
Must be a libertarian, then.
I had Heinrich Himmler more in mind as Steve Bannon’s beau ideal, Parkie.
Point is: CU's current "Conservative Scholar" thinks Bannon is awesome.
Court opinion on Eastman's use of Chapman University email is that there was no abuse — hence no automatic turnover of the entire email trove, as Chapman indicated they would be willing to do.
It was one of the many rules drafted badly enough and then used / enforced in a manner that allows for a "what we REALLY mean is" different.
Had the court ruled differently … one consequence would have been that ALL of the law school's legal clinic correspondence would have become unprotected.