U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
July 26, 2022 10:53 AM UTC
9 Comments
Six years ago, Colorado Republicans nominated little-known El Paso County Commissioner Darryl Glenn to be their nominee for U.S. Senate against incumbent Democrat Michael Bennet.
I have a more basic question – what is O'Dea offering the voters? To date he's been very careful to say as little as possible. So at present his approach seems to be – "vote for me and then once I'm in office you can discover what I'll do – if anything."
I've got the perfect campaign slogan for Joe O'Dea. He can ride this to electoral success (remember, you read it here first):
Joe O'Dea – only pretending to be bat-shit insane.
I thought I might have missed something, so searched "O'Dea" on the CPR news site.
The last article headlining O'Dea was June 28, announcing his win.
I may be wrong, but NOT having something that gets the attention of the largest newsroom operation in the state for nearly a month seems a questionable campaign strategy to me.
I still can't get over the democrats flushing $4 million down the Hanks toilet.
https://coloradosun.com/2022/07/20/senate-majority-pac-colorado-republican-primaru/
It worked for Claire McCaskill and since then everyone has tried to repeat that trick. So much wasted money on something that can't be reproduced…
It did work for Claire McCaskill, and it has worked for others.
But after 2016, we all should have recognized that the risk in elevating a screwball candidate is that the screwball might win. (I know I learned that painful lesson after 2016.)
BTW, Doug Mastriano seems to be making progress pulling traditional Republicans in PA back into the fold.
GOP warms to Doug Mastriano in Pa. Senate race – WHYY
As governor, he would be able to appoint the secretary of the commonwealth, and he would be responsible for certifying the electors in 2024.
Be careful what you wish for.
To me there is also a serious ethical component. People give money to candidates to support their message and their platform. I for one had no idea they were just dumping my money into their future opponents' campaigns.
None of this money came from candidates. These were from outside groups.
Good clarification. All the same it is money raised by the democratic party fund raising apparatus, ostensibly under the guise of supporting democratic candidates.