U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 14, 2012 03:34 PM UTC

Special Session Day One Open Thread

  • 41 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

“Any man may easily do harm, but not every man can do good to another.”

–Plato

Tweet
Share

Comments

41 thoughts on “Special Session Day One Open Thread”

  1. that support civil unions: may the force be with you.  

    To Frank McNulty: Show the citizens of this state you have the courage to be Speaker in more than name only.  You aren’t the Majority Leader; you are Speaker of the full House of Representatives.  Allow for an up or down vote on a civil union bill.

      2. Civil unions will pass, either now or next Spring.  And while it’s sad to ask the GLBT community to wait yet another year, at least the latter option carries some side benefits.

      3. I think he’s fixing the committees to ensure it doesn’t pass. He’s a fucking fool and about as politically un-savvy as they come for pandering to the fringe in his Party.  

    2. http://andrewsullivan.thedaily…

      The CBS poll shows something else: that there is a residual core of around 30 percent, even among the younger generation, who oppose all legal recognition of gay couples (which is the GOP position). Equally, a resilient 62 percent are in favor of either civil unions or civil marriages. The generational split at this point is between full marriage equality and civil unions. Among the under 45s, marriage crushes civil unions; among the over 45s, civil unions are a place where more people feel comfortable. Which means to say that the GOP is stranded with their base on a smaller and smaller island of total opposition to rights for gay couples. That base has intensity – sometimes of a furious kind. But the intensity is beginning to have a hint of desperation about it.

      1. CBS also released a poll over the week end showing the President’s at “a new low of 41%” job approval.

        I’m worried that the young vote, so very crucial in this election, is not going to turn out in the monster numbers they did in ’08.

        The Democrats need the really smart people in the Campaign to come up with the connection, in ad’s and youtube spots, of voting a pure Democratic ticket in national and local elections, to getting things done.

        The words “republican” and “discrimintation” need to mean the same thing.

        For those of us that have fought the red menace since Selma, the Civil Rights Act, and George Wallace it’s obvious, but we need to remember young people don’t have the same frame of reference we do.

        When LBJ told Bill Moyers “We’ve lost the South”, upon signing the Civil Rights Act, he was right.

        Now we need to show “the south” and “the base” for what they are……..old, petty, scared, small, and bitter.

        Young people might not know history like we do, but they know hate when they see it.  

         

  2. Money quote:

    If the election were held today, Obama would win the veteran vote by as much as seven points over Romney, higher than his margin in the general population.


    The GOP’s heated rhetoric, aimed at the party’s traditional hawks, might be expected to resonate with veterans. Yet in interviews in South Carolina, a military-friendly red state, many former soldiers expressed anger at the toll of a decade of war, questioned the legitimacy of George W. Bush’s Iraq invasion, and worried that the surge in Afghanistan won’t make a difference in the long run.

    “We looked real cool going into Iraq waving our guns,” said McDowell, 50, who retired from the 82d Airborne Division in November with a Legion of Merit and two Bronze Stars. “But people lost their lives, and it made no sense.”

    Now he worries. “I really don’t like the direction we are going, how we seem to come closer daily towards a war with Iran.”

    http://www.reuters.com/article…

    The Romneybot campaign has no veteran or military issues to speak of (either on the campaign trail or on their website) because he’s already conceded the demographic to Obama. His constant hooting and shrieking for war with Iran, in some insane attempt to out-scream the other hawks in the GOP Clowncar have already turned off the one demo that Repubs used to count on.

    Combine this with the Romneybot’s support of cutting $11 billion from VA spending, and it’s pretty certain that he loses the veteran vote this fall by double-digits.

    2. But I was dismayed at the comments which followed. Lots of vitriol about Obama. I wondered how many of the comments were from vets and how many from trolls.

      And the graphs sure portray a mixed bag in regards to support for progressive politics.

      Of course, vets are no more a monolithic “community” than gays, African Americans or others, but I do feel that there’s been a turnaround: Military folks are no longer a lock for Repubs. Citizens (and the troops are citizens; need we be reminded?) will, I think, choose butter over guns. Eventually. Obama must be given the opportunity to make the opportunity of butter available again, for vets and all other Americans.

      As an aside, I saw a report today (somewhere — I’m both too pooped from gardening and a long day to go back and reference it, sorry) that the Obama folks have finally wakened to the opportunity to woo vets (aside from Michelle’s and Mrs. Biden’s work with vet families). Given his record and obvious sincerity, it’s a fertile field.

      Hey, here’s a thought: Obama’s the “First Gay President”? Hell, he’s the “First Vet President” in a heck of a long time.

  3. We’re clearly in a tipping point on this issue. That alone probably makes it a winner, and at worse a tie.

    But with Obama’s announcement we’ve had a giant discussion on this topic throughout the country. And that discussion will accelerate the switch on this issue.

    By November any Republican in a competitive district will be shouting that they were always in favor of Gay Marriage. And Romney will bring up his grandparents to show he supports alternative marriage arrangements. (Ok, that last one may not happen.)

  4. The Legislature is about to pass a bill that makes it a DUI if you have a level of THC in your blood that is not tied to driving impairment.  

    Maybe you say, “I don’t smoke pot, so why should I care?”  

    What if I said they should lower the alcohol limit to 0.0001 while they are at it?  Now, what do you think?

        1. Wayne’s World 20 years on.

          You shouldn’t be driving drunk (even a little bit), and you shouldn’t be driving high. I don’t care how important you think your busy stoner schedule is; find the time to take a bus if you’re intoxicated. You’ll get no sympathy from me on this.

          1. I agree, no one should be driving drunk, stoned, distracted by cell phones, senile, etc. if it can be proven to actually impair one’s ability to drive.

            Plenty of studies have documented the effects of driving while intoxicated leading to an objective standard that can be applied.  That hasn’t happened with the pot DUI bill.  I’m simply asking that the science be done before criminal penalties are legislated.  

            Don’t make me ask for legislation making it illegal to be driving while fat since you’ve admitted to excessive potato chip munching.

            1. And the current classification of cannabis at the federal level makes it almost impossible to get permission to use it in research, so the data available are limited. Meanwhile, pot smokers may or may not be endangering lives on the road. There’s also currently no legitimate test to measure whether or not someone is currently intoxicated as a result of THC consumption.

              This is legitimately a really tough problem to solve, but I come down on the side of “don’t legislate punishment before defining the crime in scientifically sound terms.” Many people whose primary concern is safety do not agree with me.

              1. of any penalty based on a blood test. It is entirely possible to test COMPETENCY. It is the only thing we should test. Humans are individuals, and respond to all stimulants or intoxicants in varying degrees.

                One should NEVER drive impaired…no question. But who is to say what that is? The trained officer standing in front of you, or a chemistry test?

                I don’t carry a breathalyzer with me…do you? I have to use judgement to determine my competency. There should be no mercy for driving drunk or wasted…but those conditions should be determined by competency tests…not chemistry tests.  

          2. THC will be present in the body long after any apparent effects have worn off. For somebody who is legally authorized to imbibe marijuana for medical reasons, it seems pretty draconian to require that they refrain for perhaps a couple of days before any necessary driving to something like a doctor’s appointment.

            Since our marijuana law is based around medical use, it seems particularly cruel to target legitimate users without a sound basis that balances medical necessity with safety.  

    2. with more of the baby boomers money.

      Need to generate more penalties to insure continued growth in the industry.  They will “soon” publish studies confirming the need for more penalties.

    3. House and Senate both in recess.

      Senate is in recess waiting for bills, will reconvene for read-across of bills, committees will meet at 1:30 to act on any bills introduced, Senate will reconvene at 3:00 for Second Reading of bills that come out of committee.

      House is in recess until 11:00 until all bills are introduced, no announcement of other schedule.

      1. All I got was that Nikkel and Beezley are staying put.

        The cracks about the Other Place’s scheduling were a bit rich, considering the circumstances.

  6. About two decades ago, California, like Texas, had a soaring number of teens having babies.

    Since then, it has dramatically reduced that number, while Texas – which ranked fourth in the nation for the most teen births in 2010 – remains mired in the problem.

    One key reason for California’s success is giving teens more access to contraception, experts say. Parental consent is not required.

    http://www.mysanantonio.com/ne…

    As they say “reality has a well-know liberal bias.”

  7. The computers in my office have the audio disabled so I can not listen to what is goibng on.

    Can someone please post or tweet to CP when the civil unions bill is assigned a committe?

    It is being introduced into the house first this time.

    Thanks!

    1. The Colorado Civil Union Act has been assigned to the State Affairs committee. The committee will meet at 3:30 p.m. at the Old Supreme Court Chambers.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

49 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!