Former Republican Secretary of State candidate Tina Peters found out the results of her $250,000 recount attempt today. Peters needed about 89,000 votes to change in order for her to be declared the GOP nominee for Secretary of State instead of Pam Anderson.
She gained a total of 13 votes instead. But so did Anderson, so the margin doesn’t change.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: The realist
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Dems Save The Day, Government To Stay Open
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Weld County Gerrymandering Case Pushes The Boundaries Of Home Rule
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Obviously, a massive cover-up ….
and no doubt, Tina can prove it …. if she is allowed to.
/CT
Where they go one, they go all. Like lemmings over the cliff.
That would be $19,692 per vote.
with no net gain.
The Corrupt Little Engine That Couldn't.
But don't fret, tinap; Lindell will take care of all your sleep needs while you're sitting in jail.
Far too many republicans aka fascists believe the lies being spewed by the likes of Tina Peters, trump and a whole host of others.
Thankfully we have responsible and reasonable people in our statewide elected offices that believe in the rule of law and in the election procedures, so the impact of these carnival barkers to damage will be minimal.
That can't be said for states like FL, AZ, OH, WI and many others where these fascist kooks have far too much power in their respective state's election process.
I surely hope that people vote in record numbers in every election cycle and that they for the Democratic candidate for each and every elected office or else we're fucked.
You know what might be a good slogan..?
VOTE BLUE…NO MATTER WHO!!
bumper sticker material, I think.
😉
I would like to understand how/why the numbers changed.
I know 13 votes are minuscule, but why?
It’s usually something like a bubble being filled in lightly that didn’t get counted the first time.
Colorado Sun story is here