U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 06, 2022 12:27 PM UTC

Hoping for Turnaround, O'Dea Gets More of a "Turn Away"

  • 14 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: Filings from Senate Leadership Fund confirm the bad news for Joe O’Dea:

—–

Joe O’Dea waits for someone to pay attention to him during event on the Western Slope last month.

Ballots will begin arriving in the mailboxes of Colorado voters in about six weeks. Little-known Republican Senate candidate Joe O’Dea is in desperate need of a cash infusion from national Republicans if he is going to get his name and face in front of enough voters in time to make a difference before voting begins.

From the look of things, that money may not be coming.

The Colorado Sun reported today on something we’ve been discussing for the last week in this space (HERE and HERE): All of the talk from national Republicans about how Colorado could have a competitive Senate race in 2022 hasn’t resulted in any significant spending thus far.

Just under $9 million worth of TV ads have aired or been booked in the Senate contest this year, according to a Colorado Sun analysis of contracts filed with the Federal Communications Commission through Wednesday.

That compares with the nearly $46 million worth of TV ads that had aired or were booked before Sept. 1 in Colorado’s 2020 Senate contest between Republican U.S. Sen. Cory Gardner and Democratic former Gov. John Hickenlooper.

O’Dea’s campaign has thus far been relying on its own meager fundraising for media buys, and sources tell us that his campaign is currently buying ad space on a week-to-week basis. It’s obviously more cost-effective to purchase TV ad time in advance, but only if you know that you’re going to have the money to pay for it. In recent weeks, O’Dea has been outspent by incumbent Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet by a 3-to-1 margin.

According to a new story from NBC News, national Republican groups are putting together sizable ad buys in a handful of states…none of which are in Colorado:

While the National Republican Senatorial Committee has enlisted former President Donald Trump to help reverse lagging fundraising, much — if not most — of the money will come from the Senate Leadership Fund to start. The group, aligned with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, had already been on-air in Pennsylvania, and this week will begin to deploy the rest of a $169.2 million advertising plan across key states…

…At the moment, McConnell’s Senate Leadership Fund seems the likelier bet for a bailout. Multiple sources who spoke with NBC News said they viewed that group, and not the National Republican Senatorial Committee, as the cavalry capable of financing the bulk of the fall push. The senatorial committee had just $23 million on hand at the end of July, according to its latest filing with the Federal Election commission, giving it far less capital than the Senate Leadership Fund.

The Senate Leadership Fund ad blitz that begins Tuesday includes $37.1 million in Georgia, $27.6 in North Carolina, $28 million in Ohio and $15 million in Nevada and Wisconsin. That’s atop an existing $34.1 million commitment in Pennsylvania. Overall, the group has reserved $169.2 million in ad spending for fall campaigns. [Pols emphasis]

O’Dea probably can’t expect much help from the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC); under the leadership of Florida Republican Sen. Rick Scott, the NRSC has pissed away 95% of the money it had raised — much of that on questionable online small donor fundraising schemes. The small amount ($241,000) that the NRSC spent on ads for O’Dea in August appears to have come from an NRSC legal fund, which is probably not…legal.

 

As The Colorado Sun reports, whatever money the NRSC does have does not appear to be earmarked for O’Dea. And despite Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s claim in July that he would be “all-in” for O’Dea in the fall, the Senate Leadership Fund (SLF) remains frustratingly vague (for O’Dea, at least):

The NRSC spent $241,000 on cable TV in August with an ad linking Bennet to Democratic President Joe Biden. But NRSC and Senate Leadership Fund have yet to schedule TV time for the fall, which is a major indication the race isn’t a priority, as is the fact that national Democratic groups haven’t started spending in Colorado to shore up Bennet.

“It’s a race we’re keeping an eye on,” said Jack Pandol, a spokesman for the Senate Leadership Fund. “We continue to be impressed by the race Joe O’Dea is running in Colorado.” [Pols emphasis]

In other words, Joe: You’re probably screwed. Again, Colorado voters will be marking their ballots in about six weeks. The NRSC and SLF are waiting to board a plane that is already pulling away from the gate.

Meanwhile, in something of a last-ditch effort to generate interest in Colorado, local Republicans are still promoting a poll that may or may not exist that allegedly shows O’Dea within striking distance of Bennet. These results would be completely at-odds with all of the known public polling in the race thus far, which is probably why Republicans literally won’t show it to any reputable news outlets (as the Sun reports today, they “asked the state party for a copy but did not receive one.”) If the local GOP really has poll results filled with good news for O’Dea and they are refusing to show anyone…well, let’s just say we’d be in completely uncharted territory at that point.

We’ll update this post if we get word that any of this might be changing. If we’re not updating within the next week or so, it will be time to stop looking.

Comments

14 thoughts on “Hoping for Turnaround, O’Dea Gets More of a “Turn Away”

  1. And then there are the numbers tracked by TRACER. showing Contributions and Loans Filed in 2022.

    Democrats $13,025,811

    Republicans $5, 985,183

    Issue Committees $13,052,478

    I know, money isn't everything.  But it hints at what enthusiasm for candidates might be.

  2. How far has CNN gone faux snooze lite?  This seat is a flip to them.  Yeah.  Smell the burning piles as a channel circles the drain.  Yes, I agree that falling viewership of those too young to remember two paper cities (delivery am and pm).has a lot to do with it.  But, by going to the aging demographic is not going to save it.

    1. It appears Colorado’s own ‘Media Machiavelli,” John Malone, has lost his Midas touch — along with his marbles.

      “Give me Liberty Media, or give CNN ratings death!”

    2. Can you point to illustrative examples that CNN is "faux snooze lite"? I get that Chris Licht is working towards a revamped line up but nothing has made me believe that they are shills for Republicans. 

      I would have cancelled Reliable Sources 8 years ago when when they fired Howard Kurtz. 

  3. Both Ways Joe's campaign is getting the benefit of a bit of subterfuge. Even The Economist has run an article talking about the "closeness" of the race.

    1. I think he is getting the benefit because he is not in the same class as Hershel Walker.  Not endorsed by Trump.  Not a full on MAGA Republican so it must be close.  Hard to see someone voting for Polis and then voting for O'Dea.  Really hard to see ticket splitting this election.

  4. Uff da! Seems poor Oh’Dear’s campaign just cannot catch a break.

    Maybe Conman Cory’ll buy him a beer sometime. Two sad elephants. What might have been…

    It has become accurately axiomatic to declare that Everything Trump Touches Dies (ETTD). Like Cory, that casualty list now includes Joe O as well.

    The moral of the story? Having even just once embraced it, you might try to run from trumpstink but it never washes off and follows you around forever, no matter how much ketchup you apply.

    Wise up, GQP; your slavish, mindless, obsequious devotion to the lying, psychotic, traitorous, fascistic criminal son of a bitch (and his equally odious wannabe acolytes) is killing you and will continue killing you.

    1. Glenn Youngkin in VA was pretty smart to keep Trumpy at arm's length, being in a not total red state and all. If only Joe and especially Hiedi could learn that lesson, but no, they've gotta let the orange manbaby ruin everything for them.

  5. This senate seat was never really in any jeopardy of flipping red and Moscow Mitch has written it off. Mitch won't flush any extra money down the drain to get O'Dea's numbers up, because that would just be a huge waste of money and he's already got a problem with Rick Scott absconding with tens of millions of dollars from the NRSC.

    Who would have thought that putting the man that defrauded taxpayers of hundreds of millions of dollars would do the same thing, but this time to republican donors to the NRSC?

    Mitch is slipping and that's a good thing to watch.

  6. Of course they’re smart enough to write off Colorado. What’s surprising is they’ve apparently already written off Arizona.

    And why no money in New Hampshire?

    I’m hoping the next report shows them writing off Pennsylvania.

     

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

72 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!