U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 05, 2022 08:55 AM UTC

Sorry Sane GOP: Heidi Ganahl WANTS To Talk About "Furries"

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

We’re several news cycles into Hiedi Heidi Ganahl’s latest bout of race-derailing wackiness, determining that the best way to boost her sinking campaign is to open a new front against the peril of “furries”–claiming without any factual basis that a subculture of students “identifying as cats” are disrupting learning for kids across the state.

After the initial shock of realizing that yes, we’re talking about “furries” as if it’s a real problem, local media dutifully contacted local school districts to determine if there was even anecdotal evidence to support Ganahl’s allegations. And just like other states where conservative “furry panic” has swept through this year, as the Denver Post’s Seth Klamann reports, there’s no evidence to support any of it:

No, several large Colorado school districts said Tuesday, they are not having issues with students identifying as cats or other animals, as Republican gubernatorial candidate Heidi Ganahl has repeatedly claimed is happening in schools across the state.

Ganahl, a University of Colorado regent running to unseat Gov. Jared Polis next month, said in a radio interview last week that “schools are tolerating” students “identifying as cats.” She then doubled down on that position in subsequent interviews over the past several days: She told Fox31 that she’d received more than 100 messages from parents “across Colorado” talking about the issue in their school.

As for the claim that schools keep litterboxes on hand for use by students “who identify as cats?” The truth of that false allegation is even worse for Ganahl and Republicans who have done little to nothing to reduce the threat of gun violence in schools:

You would think that after over a week of being lampooned by local and increasingly national media, Ganahl would want to talk about something else. Anything else. After all, Ganahl’s defenders have insisted that this entire controversy was the result of hostile media “hyping” Ganahl’s supposedly “offhand remark” about furries on an AM radio show.

But you’d be wrong.

Ganahl reiterated her concern in a statement to the Denver Post on Tuesday, casting students dressing up like cats as a distraction when they should be learning. [Pols emphasis]

“As a candidate for governor, but more than anything as a parent, my concern is that distractions like children dressing up in costumes at school detract from the reality that 60% of our kids are not performing at grade level,” she said. “It’s tragic that we are failing our children. We need to make them our priority.”

It’s very simple. If you don’t want to talk about “furries,” don’t talk about “furries.”  Just move on. Ganahl’s defenders have been trying to do that for over a week by blaming the media for covering this story that Ganahl manufactured for herself.

But Heidi Ganahl wants to talk about “furries.” Either that, or she doesn’t know how to stop….and it’s destroying whatever was left of her reputation. Again, from the Post:

The claims are “exhausting” for educators, said Bret Miles, the executive director of the Colorado Association of School Executives. His group, along with the Colorado Education Association, described the claims as false. Both groups said no educator, administrator or district had ever reported issues similar to Ganahl’s claims.

“Our educators have been so focused on having a normal school year going through, we’re focused on all of that lost time that kids had over the last few years, and here we are,” Miles said. “School districts are spending time chasing down storylines that were purely for political gain. They have nothing to do with what kids are experiencing at school, and it’s shock and awe. It’s just incredibly frustrating.”…[Pols emphasis]

…He said the claim is part of a broader effort to politicize what’s happening in the classroom and is contributing to burnout and exhaustion among educators. He said that teachers are dealing with a battery of other issues that deserve attention.

Ganahl went from a candidate who talked a lot about her desire to “help” children and schools in Colorado to being someone who is actively causing more harm.

Throughout her campaign for governor, Ganahl, unlike other Republicans who have tried to pivot away from the freakshow politics that dominate GOP primaries, has instead embraced the far right at every step both before and after securing her nomination. From the “furry panic” to Ganahl’s election denier running mate, Ganahl is without question the most committed right-wing ideologue on the statewide Colorado ballot in 2022. The result of Ganahl’s inability to change course is reflected in her seventeen-point deficit in polling relative to Joe O’Dea’s ten percent.

It’s the disaster anyone could have predicted a year ago–which we did.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Sorry Sane GOP: Heidi Ganahl WANTS To Talk About “Furries”

  1. Apparently, the only non-divisive questions that Hidey can answer involve non-existent or mythical creatures? . . .

    I can’t say for certain, but I think that most voters may be more concerned about her and these many other actual fuzzy-headed candidates? . . .

    . . . but again, I can’t be certain, — as I think it was Dan Quayle who once noted: “The wasted mind of a Republican [an obvious redundancy] is a terrible thing!” . . .

  2. re:  “As a candidate for governor, but more than anything as a parent, my concern is that distractions like children dressing up in costumes at school detract from the reality that 60% of our kids are not performing at grade level,” she said. “It’s tragic that we are failing our children. We need to make them our priority.”

    I so agree.  Children dressing in costumes like cheer outfits, football uniforms, theater costumes, and mascot suits DO distract from the reality that our kids are not performing at grade level.  I'm sure that the students who were allowed whatever they wanted while sitting at home and zooming their instruction have NOTHING to do with school performance.

    I'll stop being so snarky now …

    My (limited) experience is that kids showing up wearing something comfortable for them is important. Schools where kids get bullied for what they are wearing are MUCH more inimical to learning

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

68 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!