As both Republican incumbent Rep. Scott Tipton and his Democratic challenger in Colorado’s swing CD-3, Sal Pace attempt to run to the center, only one of them may be succeeding. That’s the bottom line we derive from today’s very good write-up on health care reform by the Durango Herald’s Joe Hanel. Click through to read the whole article, it’s well worth it:
Rep. Scott Tipton joined Republicans in the U.S. House on Wednesday in a symbolic vote to repeal President Barack Obama’s signature health-care law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act…
Pace said he would have opposed the repeal vote Wednesday.
“I’ve stated my concerns with the health-care law, but this vote is nothing more than an attempt to score partisan political points,” Pace said in an email. “Unfortunately, this is another sad example of how my opponent has gone Washington by continuing to follow party leadership instead of addressing the concerns of the people of our district.”
Last week, Pace said he did not support the individual mandate. He thinks Congress could have used tax credits or other ways to expand insurance without penalizing people who don’t buy it, said his spokeswoman, Megan Dubray.
Tipton, too, likes a lot of the provisions of Obamacare, but he wants to repeal the whole law. [Pols emphasis]
This story does a great job sorting through some of the myths vs. reality surrounding the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare and the positions of the two candidates in this race. Hanel reports that Tipton’s biggest objection to Obamacare (other than perhaps the individual mandate itself) is that it “cuts Medicare for seniors by $500 billion”–except those “cuts” are fraud reduction and cuts to insurance companies, not seniors.
And, of course, the Ryan GOP budget Tipton voted for includes those “cuts” and much more.
But most importantly, the GOP-controlled House has voted over thirty times to “repeal Obamacare,” and not one of the votes has had any chance of success–pure theatrics. This combines with the factual errors by Tipton to make Sal Pace look substantially more reasonable in his approach to health care reform, even if Pace’s stand on the mandate makes liberals, health care experts quoted in the story, and the Obama campaign wince a little. Pace’s willingness to take a scalpel to Obamacare, especially as the voting public starts to understand what’s in the law, still compares favorably to Tipton’s call for a sledgehammer.
This year, in this district, it may actually be a political sweet spot.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I sure don’t see it that way. At least not from the Pace supporters I know.
It’s a $700 Billion set of new taxes, 75% of which will be placed directly on households with <$120,000 in income.
Everyone I know with insurance has seen their premiums skyrocket since Obamacare tax was passed.
On top of that we continue to absorb inflationary consumer prices … what we’re asking Democrats is … just when will the freaking bending of the cost curve occur.
I won’t even present the massive Obamacare regulatory burdens that are costing America billions in productivity and compliance costs.
Romney has pledged to increase the percentage of the Pentagons’ share of the pie from 3.5 to 4%, which will result in an extra $ 2.1 trillion in military spending over the next 10 years:
http://www.usnews.com/news/art…
http://thinkprogress.org/secur…
There will be a cost curve, but it’ll be going the other way. I’m sorry but you just earned a midget for that
LOLOLOL…. because before they were just holding steady, right? Your 2009 rate wasn’t any higher than you 1999 rate, right?
Hoo boy…
therefore Obama lowered health care costs. (See, I can argue like you too!).
A system based on private insurance, with no exclusions, but without a mandate, will make insurance costs rise.
Why buy insurance now if you can get it on the way to the hospital?
http://www.coloradopeakpolitic…
Sweet.
nobody is going to click over to that piece of shit. Wny do you even bother ?
Why won’t he answer the question?
He can’t honestly answer, yet you’ve all put him up as the Democrat candidate for federal office … something smells here.
gee, I don’t know, maybe it dosen’t merit an answer.
honestly addressed the rapidly multiplying internet reports of his multiple encounters with housepets, draft animals, and Oompah Loompahs?
don’t worry, I’ll get to the bottom of this.
When I saw the “(D-Urination)” part.
That’s honestly just tasteless.
I’m waiting for our hall monitor to chastise Arapaglop for this
just as he scolded Ari for typing “Rmoney”.
tick…tick…tick…
but Pace is far superior to Tippie.
Few have the guts to say they support the mandate when even grade school math would illustrate the necessity.
Having said that, I, like many, have a few changes I’d make to the ACA.
1) let folks use HSAs satisfy the mandate
2) (makes #1 unnecessary) Medicare for all
HSAs right now present some real issues with many tax accountants. You have to meet annual rule changes which are made not to better serve the customer but the financial institution that sells them to you
I’m still wincing.