U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
July 16, 2012 09:30 PM UTC
15 Comments
…because she got her US Citizen ship last fall, but the DHS still lists her for some reason as a legal resident.
When this happens, Mr Gessler will be meeting me in a much more personal way than he expected…
Hopefully you have a scheduled meeting with the Secretary and have not been sending demand messages that the Secretary and CSP view as threats.
First, you have no credibility posting again before completing your explanation of the pinko filibuster of the Democratic SB, extension of the middle class tax cut.
Secondly, as an individual who has never and will never serve, your bullshit, snarky and disrespectfull reply to SSGT Dan over a very real voter suppression issue is unacceptable.
Show some respect for your betters, your right to be the shitbag you are is protected by brave men and women like him.
if (actually when) he disenfranchises my wife.
Hopefully, someday we can meet in person, and you can repeat some of your earlier statements….
“If your office disenfranchises a citizen of this country through this process, do you promise to resign from your office immediately and issue an apology to that citizen?”
This is a victory for the right to vote, and for the right of every vote to COUNT. I agree that the numbers will not be very great, but that will only call into question Democrat reluctance to cooperate.
They can look up information in the database, but not simply by name and birth date – they have to have a unique ID for someone in order to use the system. I.e. they can use the system in the same way they’d use it to qualify a beneficiary.
It’s not going to be earth-shattering.
Do you understand how 1984’ish that sounds?
The potential to disenfranchise citizens is far greater than knocking a few non-citizens off of the rolls.
I’d be a lot more impressed with the right wings concerns if they had shown the same interest in counting votes in 2000 and 2004.
How do you guys keep a straight face? What hypocrisy.
have led to inaccurate voter rolls. Putting illegal aliens, properly documented foreign residents and felons in legal jeopardy just to pump up turnout seems like an ineffective solution.
It’s sad that Democrat policies would abuse people in such a manner.
Don’t know what party you are referring to.
Still goose stepping to Lund’s demands, eh?
The restrictions on using the database are the same as those placed on any other access of the system: you can’t simply troll it using a name – you have to provide a unique identifier, e.g. the number on an official certificate of residency.
This is the kind of access every government database should have (and usually does have); give me something specific to query against and I’ll say ‘yes’ or ‘no’, or give you a limited answer.
Again, provided no citizen is kicked off the rolls in error and no privacy interests are crossed, I see no problem with this kind of query.
If the new ability to query turns up nothing or very little, it won’t help Gessler. In fact it will validate his critics.
But I don’t trust the Honey Badger any father than I can throw him…
No. I typo’ed