U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line
(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 20, 2012 01:25 AM UTC

The DISCLOSE Act Deserved a Vote in the Senate

  • 20 Comments
  • by: Michael Bennet

(Good to see you, Senator!   – promoted by ProgressiveCowgirl)

I joined the Citizens United Task force in the Senate because of the damage the ruling has caused. Coloradans are enduring advertisement after advertisement advocating for, and mostly against, candidates and issues. Many of these ads are funded by a only a small number of people through groups with phony names.  And in a lot of cases, even if they wanted to, voters can’t find out who is donating to these fake committees.

We’ve introduced the DISCLOSE Act, which would create greater transparency in elections through new disclosure rules.  Disclosure isn’t the only solution, but it is one that has traditionally received bipartisan support in the past. And eight of nine Supreme Court Justices have said it’s constitutional.  

 

Justice Scalia even said it is a desired result:

“Requiring people to stand up in public for their political acts fosters civic courage, without which democracy is doomed. For my part, I do not look forward to a society which, thanks to the Supreme Court, campaigns anonymously and even exercises the direct democracy of initiative and referendum hidden from public scrutiny and protected from the accountability of criticism. This does not resemble the Home of the Brave.”

It takes courage to put your name on something. It takes courage to stand for something that’s unpopular. It doesn’t take a lot of courage to let somebody use your money in a way that keeps you completely anonymous and imposes something on families in our state, who are trying to make a fundamental American decision to vote in a democracy.  

We’re also facing the danger of allowing only a few individuals to use Super PACs to drown out the voice of the rest of the country.   One individual, who has given more money to super PACs in 2012 than anyone else in the country, has a net worth of $24.9 billion. His $35 million in spending is the equivalent of the average family giving $108. To give a sense of perspective, the median household income in Colorado is roughly $56,000.  If family earning $56,000 every year never paid any taxes and didn’t spend a nickel, it take them 441,000 years before it added up to what this one guy has.

Earlier this week the taskforce attempted to bring the DISCLOSE Act to the Senate floor for debate. Unfortunately, a minority of senators used a procedural tactic to prevent us from even debating the bill. The taskforce responded on the Senate floor late into the night.

A poll follows. My staff and I will do our best to answer questions and respond to comments throughout the day.

 

Do you support the DISCLOSE Act?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Tweet
Share

Comments

20 thoughts on “The DISCLOSE Act Deserved a Vote in the Senate”

  2. I am outraged that Congressman Coffman, and so many other politicians whose soul purpose seems to be protecting the very rich, has mutilated the real purpose of this bill by calling it “about free speech”. I knew when I worked hard to get you elected that you would stand up for middle income Americans. Thank you for being our ally. Every day, the actions of the Tea Party wingnuts in Congress are more egregious. It is time to clean House… literally. The American people will not give up this country to the 1% without a fight.

      1. R U serious ?

        there is still slavery worldwide.

        sex trafficking depends on slavery.

        so do segments of the hospitality industry.  

        and direct elections of Senators decoupled federal governance from state concerns.  U think that’s good ?  

        1. While I was an avowed supporter of our good friend Andrew during the primary, I believe Senator Bennet has done a good and admirable job as a senator. Of course, I don’t agree with everything he has done, but he is a good man whose heart and head are essentially in the right place.

          The Disclosure Bill is an important fight…thank you, Senator. And, um…the next time you see the Governor…would you talk to him about this “fracking” nonsense he is spewing for “the guys”? I know I shouldn’t ask, but it’s important.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

51 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!