U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 17, 2022 02:40 PM UTC

Is There Any Urban Myth Heidi Ganahl Won't Believe?

  • 13 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Over at Republican gubernatorial candidate Hiedi Heidi Ganahl’s Facebook page, where the supportive comments over Ganahl’s campaign against the menace of “furries” clawing and hissing their way through the hallways of Colorado public schools are still flowing fast and furious, a whole new moral panic is taking shape over “pro-pedophilia” posters allegedly going up “all over” Denver:

A closer look:

Ordinarily a candidate wouldn’t bear any responsibility for unsourced claims posted as comments to their social media pages, but in this case Ganahl saw fit to personally respond with a supportive angry emoticon:

Unfortunately, just like the misbegotten “furry panic” that Ganahl refused against all pleading even from friends to let die, a brief bit of Googling could have saved Ganahl a great deal of embarrassment.

Because unless actor and leading right-wing Twitter blowhard James Woods time-traveled to Denver in the fall of 2022 and took this photo back with him to July of 2018, Ganahl and her excited supporters are being needlessly terrorized once again. This poster was allegedly found somewhere in Oregon over four years ago, and enjoyed a grand tour around conservative social media before settling into the “4chan meme stash” for future periodic recycling. The true origins were never verified, but it’s widely believed to have been a “false flag” prank meant to discredit the LGBTQ+ community.

And now it’s what Heidi Ganahl wants to talk about after the “furries!”

One awful parody to the next, folks. It truly is Ganahl’s campaign in a nutshell.

Comments

13 thoughts on “Is There Any Urban Myth Heidi Ganahl Won’t Believe?

    1. "Save the children!!!  (from Catholic priests)"

      Something like that crossed my mind. When they started banning drag queens from coming into schools reading to children, does that mean no more priests in black cassocks or the cardinals in red dresses?

      Drag is drag, no?

  1. Empty G and her opponent are on CSPAN. She is going to town about the Democrat Party being the part of child abuse. She looks and sounds like she needs a rabies shot.

  2. How many children are in the foster system and awaiting adoption?  Quite frankly, from the picture I see, I could easily understand the appeal to be for gays to be able to adopt. 

    A year ago, "The list of foster children who legally belong to the state of Colorado has 533 names."  from the awful stories of some (" a 15-year-old girl who has lived in 26 places since she went into foster care and became available for adoption at age 10."), it seems like there could well be some need for "love" — parental love — in the state.

  3. Ganahl demonstrates over and over that she has NO good judgment. If she ever had any, it's long gone. 

    Folks, here's an election tip for you: Vote for candidates who can demonstrate they have GOOD JUDGMENT! You are voting for them to represent you, make decisions for you. You should want someone whose judgment is at least as good as yours.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

80 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!