President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
August 21, 2012 08:32 PM UTC
14 Comments
Wind energy is pretty awesome, it can’t be outsourced, and is very green. Taking away an incentive to keep American jobs and technology seems short-sighted and malicious at best.
Do you notice how our Colorado Republicans are allowed to think for themselves? The party platform follows the nominee. But that doesn’t mean we can’t have our opinions.
Unlike being a pro-life pro-traditional marriage Democrat.
There are just fewer and fewer and fewer people allowed in. Good luck with that.
Proof you’re wrong?
White male anti-choice anti-gay pro-drilling corporate shills that support wind power and those that don’t HUGE TENT and EVERYONE is welcome…well, not everyone everyone…
I was active in the Republican Party for decades but today try and nominate a pro choice or pro gay rights candidate in the Republican party primary or convention and see what happens.
You can’t really assume the Republican Party is a big tent when there are litmus tests that are absolute bars to most people running for the party’s nomination.
LOL! Sure, they think for themselves, as long as it’s in line with what big oil likes, what the teabaggers like, and isn’t so honest that it gets them in trouble (see: Akin, Rep. Todd).
Reince Preibus on MSNBC:
“This is the platform of the Republican Party; this is not the platform of Mitt Romney.”
So which is it?
difficult to read . . . looks something like, “better not tell you now” . . .
Let’s try asking it something else, maybe tax avoidance . . . or countries that are favorable shelters?
The 2008 Democratic platform was not the platform of Barack Obama, though it was close.
The problem with Preibus’s statement is, Romney’s platform really isn’t that different from the Republican Party platform. He’s just trying to give Romney some maneuvering room by keeping the uncertainty level high.
“Republican Platform Won’t Protect Mortgage Tax Deduction
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/…
The mortgage interest vote was a shift in Republican policy from four years ago, when the party platform said that “because affordable housing is in the national interest, any simplified tax system should continue to encourage homeownership, recognizing the tremendous social value that the home mortgage interest deduction has had for decades.”
Thank God they are preserving the O&G subsidies.
GOP Priorties — to the strong the spoils, to the weak — eh, who cares?
GOP Platform Committee voted down a plank in support of the mortgage interest deduction, presumably as part of deficit reduction. MID was supported in the 2008 platform.
CBO estimates the MID costs the federal treasury about $80 billion a year.
Ryan’s plan isn’t THE PLAN??