U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
December 19, 2022 11:36 AM UTC
5 Comments
There's a pretty good chance a grand jury is already looking at indictments of some of these treacherous fools.
The Jan. 6th in question was nearly 2 years ago. It is past time to stop "looking" and start indicting!
They definitely should report on major events: the 1/6 committee findings, when indictments are handed down, when defendants are being arraigned, motions hearings, trial dates, and PERHAPS most rewarding of all, SENTENCINGS.
But this obsession with every minute detail of every aspect of these cases is ridiculous. I realize it has created a second career for Adam Schiff, Jamie Raskin, Joyce Vance, Eli Honig, and the rest of them, but isn't there something else going on in the world for the rest of us to be up to date on …..
The first time in the history of the United States that congress has referred a former President for criminal prosecution kinda' seems maybe a little bit newsworthy? (It may not be Harry and Meghan newsworthy, but still.)
Just a quick reminder before Jan. 3 rolls around and the House votes for a Speaker — today's UNANIMOUS votes authorizing criminal referrals on Trump and some advisors are a very direct descendant of Rep. Kevin McCarthy's unwillingess to name anyone to the committee if he couldn't have all five of those he recommended.
Pelosi set the Select committee as a near-EXACT clone of the Benghazi Select Committee. Eight from the majority, five from the minority, all selected by the Speaker after recommendations from the Majority and Minority leaders. McCarthy's strategic choice — offer seats to Rep. Jim Jordan and Rep. Jim Banks, "who [both] voted against certifying the 2020 Presidential election" and criticized the instructions proposed for the committee's focus. Pelosi objected to those two and McCarthy then refused to offer any and encouraged members of the Republican caucus to turn down any offer from Pelosi.
McCarthy's choice means investigation proceded without any critical input from partisan opponents. Presentations in the hearings happened as opponents to Trump's actions wished. The report summarizing findings will have a single point of view — there will be NO minority report.
That is the special outcome of the strategic choice of Rep. Kevin McCarthy, the man who may not have enough votes to be Speaker but has more than enough wearing OK ["Only Kevin"] buttons to insure no other Republican would be able to win, either.