President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
February 15, 2023 10:40 AM UTC
10 Comments
It doesn’t pass the chill text.
If I considered this with a cynical viewpoint, I'd guess that AFP is setting up a campaign to say something like "regulators didn't protect you from higher prices, so we ought to abolish the regulators."
Yup. There's no way the Koch fiends have honest intentions with this.
There’s something wrong when you fully agree with what someone is saying, but oppose it because of who they are. If someone supports a good idea for the wrong reason, they’re still supporting that good idea.
welcome their support and thank them for their efforts.
There is nothing wrong with questioning the motives of someone who is supporting something completely out of character with every one of their past actions. That's called being wise.
If you have a goal, the motives of those who join you in seeking the goal are immaterial.
Otherwise, you can stand all alone with your pure motives while others achieve their goals.
Understanding their motives is completely material when all previous actions by those in question have been to work diametrically against your goals. Are you guys serious about this? This is like "your husband beat you every day but today he wants to help you with the laundry so you should just be happy" level of ridiculousness.
She should still divorce the SOB after he finishes helping her with the laundry. But use his labor first.
It doesn't matter if the cat is black or white as long as it kills rats,
As with the Lincoln Project in 2020, I'll take the assist. So long as we're not permitted to drag Xcel executives and PUC members from their homes and beat them into quivering puddles of goo, the enemy of my enemy is my [temporary] friend [of convenience].
Probably because the rate cases, outside of the pass-through fuel charges, are used to build out the facilities approved under Xcel's Clean Energy Plan. No rate increases = no new thousand of MW's of wind, solar and battery along with the transmission lines to deliver the power to the Front Range.
Americans for Prosperity would prefer that Xcel keep rates low by relying on depreciated coal and gas plants in the current fleet.