This afternoon, the Colorado Senate is debating Senate Bill 23-279, a late-introduced bill banning the possession and manufacture of “ghost guns.” This bill was introduced in direct response to a shooting at Denver’s East High School earlier this year that reportedly involved such a weapon. In keeping with the general trend this legislative session, though mostly in the ungovernable House GOP micro-minority, Senate Republicans are putting up a spirited fight–one of the last chances for Republicans to slow the wheels of progress before the session ends next month.
What’s interesting about this particular conflict is that Colorado Senate Republicans are standing in opposition to numerous Republican prosecutors and mayors, from Mayor Mike Coffman in Aurora to the failed 2022 GOP candidate for attorney general, John Kellner. Marianne Goodland of the Colorado Springs Gazette’s political blog reported last week when the legislation passed its first committee hearing:
The seventh major gun bill of the 2023 session encountered one of the shorter paths to its first committee victory, given its support from Democratic and Republican mayors, as well as from district attorneys and law enforcement officials…
[Colorado Springs Mayor] Suthers, Aurora Mayor Mike Coffman and Denver Mayor Michael Hancock all called for a crackdown on ghost guns in a letter to the Colorado Springs Gazette in January, calling for state laws to deter the use of these untraceable weapons, in part because people who possess those weapons are able to circumvent background checks, or could obtain them even when under a restraining order or red flag protection order…
And juveniles are getting them, too, said [GOP DA John] Kellner, who pleaded with lawmakers to give them the tools to go after the people who sell these guns and make them so prevalent in communities. [Pols emphasis]
Of all the gun safety bills passed by Democratic lawmakers in the last decade in Colorado, outlawing the production of “ghost guns” should be one of the least controversial. It’s a common-sense update to account for easily-available 3D printers to create the specific component of a modern firearm that legally counts as the weapon. With that relatively small piece of plastic in hand, a working firearm can be completed by purchasing the “spare parts” necessary with no background check required. In short, to oppose this legislation is to support subverting all of our existing laws regulating gun access.
That’s why Republican elected officials in cities plagued by gun violence and Republican prosecutors, even those with an expansive interpretation of the Second Amendment, support what should be no-brainer bipartisan legislation to crack down on ghost guns. Polling on the issue shows public support for banning ghost guns consistently over 70%.
The moral of the story? There’s the merely out-of-touch, and then there’s Senate GOP-level out-of-touch.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: QuBase
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
The bill makes sense. But there is a huge gap in the story.
If it passes, how will this bill be enforced? Seems that the components are all available on line. The bill sounds as unenforceable as the far rightie bans on receiving Mifepristone through the mail.
Good point CB. Simplest explanation would be that anyone caught with a “ghost gun” would be cited for a felony. Maybe we can’t stop the procurement of these parts but we can make it a steep penalty if some one is caught with one. It the bill doesn’t do that then it is flawed.
Class 1 misdemeanor for 1st offense, Class 5 felony for 2nd and subsequent offenses, at least as the bill stands now.
So someone unable to purchase a firearm through legal channels is required to bring their illegally manufactured firearm to a dealer to be denied a successful background check. Seems like common sense legislation to me.
You're suggesting that perhaps not every gun owner is a "responsible gun owner"??? Whodathunk?!? . . .