President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
May 04, 2023 11:18 AM UTC
9 Comments
B F T !!!!!!
Should have been done long ago. Either the peoples work is important enough to accomplish without childish delays, or it isn't. (And if it isn't, then just adjourn, go home, and find another occupation.)
Sometimes it sucks being the adult(s). Sometimes it sucks watching the children act like children. But, it's the burden of the adult majority in the room to keep the focus on the adults' business and moving that properly along.
('bout fucking time)
Someday Democrats will learn that Republicans cannot be trusted and can only be beaten.
Hey GOP, don't play childish games and you won't have to be treated like the spoilt children you are.
it would be of mild interest to clarify just how much debate there has been on a bill when it was introduced, considered in the committees of one chamber, as it was considered for passage and referral to the other chamber, in committee of the second chamber, and on the floor as it goes through the reading of the bill.
"Colorado has something called Rule 14, which only takes a simple majority to pass and can limit debate on a bill to as little as an hour."
And that is a limit of an hour at ANY single step of the process, as I understand it, though it could be only for the debates of the each chamber as a whole.
The Dems tried to do something about reading bills at length a few years ago and lost in court.
To hell with Rule 14. Chloroform and duct tape would be more appropriate and effective with these morons.
Still, at this very moment Rs are having the entire 100-something-page land use bill SB 23-213 read aloud at length. That's gonna take a chunka chunka precious time.
Yup. Hours.
I went out for a LONG hike after posting, and while the computer was done reading the bill when I got back, the House was still debating on it.