President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 31, 2023 11:00 AM UTC

Deal or No Deal, Debt Ceiling is Big Trouble for Boebert

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

WEDNESDAY UPDATE: However the vote plays out later today, we’ll always have this meme-able moment:

“It’s just a huge fail on our part.”

If the internets are on the job, you’ll be seeing this everywhere.

—–

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-ifle)

Congressperson Lauren Boebert is mad as hell, and she’s not going to take it anymore!

Again.

As readers of Colorado Pols well know, Boebert really only has one tool in her political playbook: “Voice loud opposition to [TOPIC OF THE DAY].” You’ve heard her talk, again and again, about all of the things that everybody else is doing wrong, from President Biden to her own caucus leader, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. What you’ve never heard her say is a sentence that begins with, “I have an idea…” or “Maybe we could try…”

Boebert is an original MAGA Republican who worships at the golden desk of Donald Trump – a former President who was always one week away from announcing his health care plan or his infrastructure proposal. Boebert is also a proud member of the House Freedom Caucus – as is Congressman Ken Buck (R-Greeley) – which was formed in 2015 with the stated purpose of being against things. 

All of this is to say that Boebert is incredibly ill-equipped to deal with the massive political problem facing  both her and the United States: Raising the debt limit to avoid a catastrophic global financial recession. The second-term Congressperson has painted herself into a corner that will make her one of the big losers of this debate no matter how things turn out in the end. 

Over the Memorial Day weekend, Biden and McCarthy worked out an apparent deal to raise the debt ceiling and prevent the United States from defaulting on its financial obligations for the first time in history. The next step in this process is already fraught with obstacles. As The Washington Post explains:

In the first test of a bipartisan deal on the debt ceiling, a key House committee will meet Tuesday to determine whether the agreement comes to a full vote, all while the country inches closer to next week’s default deadline.

The House Rules Committee — typically the first stop before legislation can go before the full House — will convene with attention fixed on a handful of far-right Republicans who could thwart the future of a deal struck over the weekend by President Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.).

Two of the committee’s nine GOP members — Reps. Ralph Norman (S.C.) and Chip Roy (Tex.) — belong to the Freedom Caucus and have come out against the deal.

“The Republican conference has been torn asunder,” Roy said at a Freedom Caucus news conference Tuesday, where members of the hard-right caucus took turns bashing the deal and lamenting that McCarthy, in reaching a deal with Biden, had broken the GOP’s unified front.

Just last month, Boebert voted for McCarthy’s original debt ceiling proposal – one that was DOA in the Senate – but she’s now back on the “very angry” side of the ledger. She called the Biden-McCarthy deal a “stab in the back” and took her turn to complain loudly at a Freedom Caucus press conference on Monday:

 

 

It is not entirely clear that Boebert really understands what is at stake or even how this all works. Debt ceiling discussions are NOT about spending cuts; raising the debt ceiling is needed in order to pay for things that have already been approved by Congress in prior years, like former President Trump’s tax cut for wealthy Americans in 2019. Raising the debt ceiling is akin to paying your credit card bill – it has nothing to do with what you plan on purchasing next.  

Via Mountaineer Research (April 2023)

But Boebert is now a loud voice in opposition to a debt ceiling deal because, well, that’s her shtick; she desperately wants to keep her D-list celebrity status as one of the GOP’s loudest voices against stuff. As we know from recent polling data, however, Boebert’s constituents in CO-03 would prefer that she do more to represent them

Not raising the debt ceiling would be devastating for the world economy, but also for Colorado directly [check out this fact sheet from the White House for more information]. Costs would go up and benefits would go down for families, seniors, and veterans in Boebert’s district. Boebert’s outspoken opposition to a deal that would prevent a default doesn’t change the fact that she also committed herself to voting FOR devastating cuts in the form of McCarthy’s budget – messaging that Democrats will get to use against her in the next campaign.

Sure, Boebert’s colleagues in the Freedom Caucus, including Ken Buck, have taken similar positions. But Boebert is distinguished from them for two reasons: First, she’s the only Freedom Caucus member in a competitive race; and second, unlike Buck, she voted for the McCarthy budget in April.

And what will Boebert do if this internal Republican battle escalates to an attempt at ousting McCarthy from the Speaker’s chair? House Freedom Caucus member Dan Bishop (R-NC) is calling for a challenge to McCarthy; this is a process that McCarthy had to allow as part of negotiations in January to make him Speaker in the first place. 

Nothing says, “I’m focused on issues important to the people of Montrose” like failing to prevent a government default and then ousting your own Speaker after less than six months. 

Comments

12 thoughts on “Deal or No Deal, Debt Ceiling is Big Trouble for Boebert

  1. BB-brain Rebobo hasn't a prayer in '24.

    I wonder what the Wingnut Welfare will give her to do once she's been evicted from Fascist Barbie's Taxpayer-funded Dreamhouse.

    1. She'll probably end up on Fox. They're not just hiring blond bimbos who excite angry old white men anymore. Call it Fox's version of diversity.

  2. Not satisfied with already having time and again proven herself the House’s biggest maroon, she’s compelled to remind the entire world of that over and over every single day . . .

    . . . repetitive performative indignation syndrome at its most tedious and dangerous.

  3. This budget deal is also a big wet kiss for oil and gas  interests in the SE US. It expedites building a big-ass pipeline that Joe Manchin wanted. Climate activists have called the proposed Mountain Valley pipeline a “carbon bomb”.
     

    1. Well the 2011 debt deal got picked apart over the following years when they realized a lot of it was pure folly, so we can hope that the same happens in this case as well.

  4. To be fair, although the debt limit is putatively only supposed to be the approval of payment for debts already incurred under the actual budget, it has long been treated by the GOP as a chance to re-litigate the budget. Notoriously for Gingrich and also with Obama.

    The media and GOP leadership are as confused about this back-door shadow budget process as she is.

    And much of this deal in fact is about reducing/freezing spending, as past deals have been as well. So, the Democrats have accepted the GOP’s use of debt limit deals as a “second budget” process, often in fact making sweeping multi-year commitments that tie their hands in future annual budget cycles

  5. At this point we all get that Bobo is performatively angry, indignant, etc. but that is no substitute for being utterly useless.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

265 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!