U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 03, 2012 09:16 PM UTC

Fun with the Fiscal Cliff

  • 18 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

The Daily Beast had a fascinating story yesterday regarding budget discussions in Washington. President Obama is learning to be more aggressive in the wake of his re-election and is no longer trying to appease Republican lawmakers:

In the past, the modus operandi from the White House on tax and spending issues was a tone poem of tortured frustration, self-criticism, and bargaining. They’d make a middle-of-the-road proposal and then very quickly move off it, failing to appease Republicans and demoralizing the base. But this time is different. Now, the Republicans are compromising and demoralizing their base…

…”They’re in kind of a tough position now,” Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said on Fox News Sunday. “They’re trying to figure out how to find a way to support things that they know they’re gonna have to do. That’s going to be hard for them.” (Note: the very willingness of Geithner to appear on a Fox program is a sign of the administration’s newfound confidence.) Geithner pounded home the Obama administration’s talking point: we’ve put forward our plan. If the Republicans don’t like it, they should put forward their own. [Pols emphasis]

This approach would have made a lot of sense four years ago, and it probably would have prevented the health care debate from dragging on for 18 months. The strategic decision to ask Republicans, “What is your proposal?” is devastating in its simplicity, in part because the GOP is completely lost on the issue:

The reality should be seeping in to viewers of the Sunday shows that the Republicans don’t have a game plan. They don’t have a single, specific proposal to avoid the fiscal cliff. And even if they had one, they don’t have a roadmap to get there. They keep expecting Obama to come back with something more to their liking, which they’d also reject.

Many Republicans literally don’t understand what is happening. [Pols emphasis] Sen. Charles Grassley tweeted over the weekend that he was frustrated that President Obama hadn’t embraced the recommendation of the Bowles-Simpson Commission. Apparently, he is one of the many people in Washington who doesn’t understand that Bowles-Simpson recommended letting the Bush tax rates on the wealthy expire, while also proposing to cap or eliminate deductions primarily enjoyed by the wealthy.

 

Unfortunately for Republicans, the national narrative (and polling data) is not in their favor. The public isn’t buying the idea that the White House is the problem, which is particularly problematic when you have Republicans who don’t even understand some of the basic fundamentals. It’s become abundantly clear that the GOP will shoulder most of the blame if there is no budget decision.

Comments

18 thoughts on “Fun with the Fiscal Cliff

  1. The GOP members of Congress are definitely in a tough spot:

    Norquist: Tea party resurgence if no “fiscal cliff” deal.

    Even worse, Norquist seems pretty sure that the Tea Party will never vote for Obama again — Oh My!

    Grover Norquist is predicting that President Obama will be the political target of tea partiers if a deal on averting the “fiscal cliff” fails to materialize.

    I guess Obama will just have to buckle under and cut taxes and raise defense spending…

  2. Let the Bush tax cuts expire.

    New, more Democratic Congress in the beginning of January.

    New taxes on the wealthy, new/old cuts on Joe and Josephina Sixpack.

    And I wish everyone would stop talking about $250K income as the point of additional taxation.  That’s ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME, which probably reflects gross income of at least 50% more for those that get there.

  3. Dear Mr. President,

    After a status quo election in which both you and the Republican majority in the House were re-elected, the American people rightly expect both parties to come together on a fair middle ground and address the nation’s most pressing challenges.

    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ti

    “Fair middle ground” of course means keep the rich happy.

    That didn’t feel like status quo to me.

  4. Obama has learned how to negotiate with the GOP. It’s looking really good so far. I’m hoping tomorrow that on all those cuts in the GOP counter-proposal he asks them for the specifics. That will have people howling.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

49 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!