(Republished under Creative Commons license by Colorado Pols)
by Quentin Young, Colorado Newsline
July 13, 2023
The Colorado secretary of state declined to say whether she will grant ballot access to former President Donald Trump, who is running for president in 2024.
“We are going to officially decline to comment at this time,” Annie Orloff, spokesperson for Democratic Secretary Jena Griswold, said in response to an inquiry from Colorado Newsline.
In Colorado the secretary of state has authority over the ballot qualification process.
The absence of an affirmative response from Griswold to the question of whether Trump’s name will be permitted to appear on the Colorado presidential ballot comes as pressure for her to deny ballot access on constitutional grounds intensifies and a watchdog group says lawsuits over the matter are assured.
Many pro-democracy advocates say the insurrection disqualification clause in Section 3 of the 14 Amendment bars Trump from public office. The nonprofit advocacy groups Free Speech For People and Mi Familia Vota Education Fund invoked that clause Wednesday when they sent letters to the chief election officials in nine states, including Griswold in Colorado, requesting that they exclude Trump, a Republican, from their state’s ballots.
“Criminal prosecutions will establish Trump’s liability under the law. But the enforcement of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment against Trump will ensure that our republic is protected and that this insurrectionist-in-chief is forever disqualified from holding any future public office,” Free Speech For People President John Bonifaz said in a statement.
Other states targeted by the group are California, Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Oregon and Pennsylvania. The groups previously made a similar request in Nevada.
The watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has sent similar letters to secretaries of state and attorneys general, according to Donald K. Sherman, CREW’s executive vice president and chief counsel.
“Donald Trump took an oath to defend the Constitution. There was an insurrection. Donald Trump participated in it, in violation of his oath. And, you know, 2 plus 2 equals 4, and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment says you can’t do that,” Sherman wrote in an email Wednesday.
Newsline contacted Colorado Republican Party chair Dave Williams for comment but did not immediately receive a response.
One way or another, people are getting sued.
-Donald K. Sherman, of CREW
Adopted after the Civil War to deal with officials in the former Confederacy, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment says, “No person shall … hold any office, civil or military, under the United States … who, having previously taken an oath … to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”
Democracy advocates argue that Trump violated the disqualification clause with his actions around the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. Among other authorities that blame him for the attack, the House committee investigating Jan. 6 accused him of inciting an “insurrection.”
CREW represented plaintiffs who in September successfully sued to have Couy Griffin, a former Republican county commissioner in Otero County, New Mexico, excluded from office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. He was the first elected official since 1869 to be barred from office based on the disqualification clause. Griffin was part of the pro-Trump mob that stormed the Capitol.
CREW plans more such lawsuits.
“One way or another, people are getting sued,” Sherman said in a Newsline interview in April. “Maybe a secretary of state removes Trump from the ballot affirmatively, or blocks him from getting on the ballot affirmatively — Trump will sue them. If they don’t remove him, and they decide to put him on the ballot, I imagine some of these folks will get sued by people like us on behalf of constituents in those states.”
Sherman declined to discuss where CREW might file disqualification lawsuits. But he said it is important for CREW “to bring a case that is likely to succeed early enough in the process to provide clarity.”
About the prospect of filing a lawsuit in Colorado, Sherman said, “I think that there are attractive factors with respect to Colorado. You know, not the least of which that there’s a 10th Circuit opinion written by now-Justice Gorsuch precisely on this point.”
In 2012, when current Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch was serving as a U.S. Court of Appeals judge in Denver, the court affirmed in Hassan v. Colorado that states may “exclude from the ballot candidates who are constitutionally prohibited from assuming office.”
In their letter, Free Speech For People and Mi Familia Vota Education Fund cite the Hassan case in noting that a secretary of state can similarly bar someone from the presidential ballot if they do not satisfy the U.S. Constitution’s age or citizenship criteria, as Republican Scott Gessler, then the Colorado secretary of state, did in the Hassan case.
The deadline for Griswold to certify names for the 2024 Colorado presidential primary ballot is Jan. 5.
Colorado Newsline is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Colorado Newsline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Quentin Young for questions: info@coloradonewsline.com. Follow Colorado Newsline on Facebook and Twitter.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: ParkHill
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: harrydoby
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Powerful Pear
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
So how is this going to work? Griswold allows Trump to be on the primary ballot and gets sued. How quickly can it go to trial?
There are a couple of layers to this onion. Her decision would be subject to review as an administrative appeal but that is limited. More likely, he would file a civil suit seeking injunctive relief along with a plethora of other claims for relief.
If he files the civil suit against Griswold, perhaps the state AG should ask that Trump's civil suit trail the latest E. Jean Carroll cases, the hush money NYC criminal case, the federal court "Box Hoax" case in Florida, the yet-to-be-determined state court case in Fulton County, Georgia and the prospective federal case in DC on 1/6.
So many lawyers, so few being paid.
I would guess that unless there were a conviction of Trump for something related to the election, Trump will be eligible to be on the Colorado ballot.
If CREW or someone else wants to sue, it would be their burden to show Trump falls under the 14th Amendment — and as best I know, the only person blocked so, County Commissioner Couy Griffin, already had a conviction.
So, SoS certifies Trump, someone sues, and there is no preliminary injunction. I doubt a judge would prioritize the case for fear of looking partisan, and the matter becomes moot once the primary is held the first Tuesday in March.
The matter isn't moot until the day Congress meets to certify the electoral count. If Trump is found ineligible due to a trial that happens next year then that ruling is a Consitutional block on his swearing-in.
Can you just imagine the fit he'll pitch if enough states say, "Sorry. You can't be on our ballot" to knock him out?