U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 21, 2023 11:49 AM UTC

Colorado closer to banning ‘abortion reversal’ treatment after medical board decision

  • 2 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

(Republished under Creative Commons license by Colorado Pols)

by Sara Wilson, Colorado Newsline

The Colorado Medical Board decided Thursday that a so-called abortion reversal method is outside the “generally accepted standard of practice.”

The board did not go so far as to declare the method unprofessional conduct, as Democrats in the state Legislature hoped for. Still, the decision is a significant step in getting the practice banned in the state, which has become a destination for pregnant people seeking abortion care, as other states restrict access.

A new law signed by Gov. Jared Polis this year would classify providing medication abortion reversals as unprofessional misconduct, thus effectively banning it in the state — unless the state’s medical, nursing and pharmacy boards decide the procedure is a “generally accepted standard of practice.”

“Although the board will not treat medication abortion reversal as a per se act of unprofessional misconduct, the board does not consider administering, dispensing or delivering progesterone with the intent to interfere with, reverse, or halt a medication abortion undertaken through the use of mifepristone and/or misoprostol to meet generally accepted standards of medical practice,” the new rule reads. “Licensees are expected to practice evidence-based medicine, and any licensee who provides unscientific treatments that fall below the generally accepted standard of care may be subject to discipline.”

The Board of Nursing and the Board of Pharmacy are scheduled to decide on their proposed rules Sept. 20 and 21.

The rule states that the board would investigate reported instances that could meet the definition of a medication abortion reversal on a case-by-case basis.

It took hours of public testimony, debate and a lengthy executive session with the board’s lawyer to approve the rule.

Abortion reversal refers to when a patient takes a high dose of progesterone after they take mifepristone, the first pill in a two-step medication abortion procedure. The idea is that the progesterone can offset the effects of mifepristone if a regretful patient takes it soon enough. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists call claims in support of the abortion reversal practice “not based on science.”

Some anti-abortion centers in Colorado, sometimes referred to by proponents as crisis pregnancy centers, offer abortion reversal, and bill sponsors argued that the centers target vulnerable pregnant people to prevent them from seeking timely abortion care or convince them to attempt an abortion reversal.

While the intention of the legislation was clear through testimony and statements from the sponsors, the bill text does not actually include the terms progesterone, mifepristone or misoprostol.

Dr. Roland Flores, the president of the medical board, had concerns about that broad language in the law and whether it could unintentionally capture situations other than the progesterone treatment.

“It seems to me that the intent of this bill was to stop the predatory bait-and-switch of deceiving women. It would be my assumption that none of us have any question about whether a bait-and-switch and deception is an unethical practice of medicine,” he said. “The legislation does not lay (progesterone) out specifically. It is incredibly general in that ‘any prescription medicine’ and then ‘any medicine used to interfere with that process.’”

By specifically naming the medications in the board’s rule, it is concurrent with the legislation’s intent, Flores said.

“This ruling is a huge win for reproductive rights and justice. We are proud to be the first state in the nation to ensure that our communities will no longer be deceived into an unethical, experimental practice, and that providers of this so-called treatment will be held accountable for their actions,” Katherine Riley, the policy director for the Colorado Organization for Latina Opportunity and Reproductive Rights, and Natasha Berwick, the political director for New Era Colorado, said in a joint statement.

Colorado Newsline is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Colorado Newsline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Quentin Young for questions: info@coloradonewsline.com. Follow Colorado Newsline on Facebook and Twitter.

Comments

2 thoughts on “Colorado closer to banning ‘abortion reversal’ treatment after medical board decision

  1. "has become a destination for pregnant people seeking abortion care…."

    Did you mean to say "pregnant women?" 

    Otherwise, good article since there is no such thing as "abortion reversal."

    1. Technically, a non-binary person or someone in gender transition can become pregnant. So it is correct to say, " pregnant people" rather than "pregnant women", although I confess that it grates on me, too.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

66 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!