President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 11, 2013 10:37 AM UTC

You Only Get Five Bills, So Why Not Waste Them?

  • 18 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Among the many pieces of legislation introduced in the Colorado General Assembly this week, highlighted by economic development and middle-class tax relief measures in the Democratic controlled House and Senate respectively, are a few real, shall we say, hum-dingers. Here’s a brief tour, with more sure to follow–post good ones you find in this space.

Guns: In addition to the “More Guns In Schools Act” we discussed yesterday from conservative Senate firebrands Scott Renfroe and Ted Harvey, GOP freshman Rep. Justin Everett is carrying this year’s version of the perennial “Make My Day Better” bill, with Sen. Kevin Grantham as the Senate sponsor. If you pay attention to its yearly introduction, debate, and death, you already know it’s opposed by more or less everybody in a public safety role.

God: Headed directly for the House State Affairs Committee, a.k.a. the “kill committee,” is Rep. Kevin Priola’s House Bill 13-1066, “Concerning the preservation of a person’s exercise of religion.” A state flavor of the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, the bill (interestingly for the normally tort-hating Rep. Priola) allows for monetary damages to plaintiffs if a “substantial burden” to a person’s exercise of religion is proven. This legislation is considered by opponents as providing an affirmative defense for various kinds of discrimination.

Bedrooms: In addition to Rep. Janak “Dr. Nick” Joshi’s warmed-over “fetal homicide” bill, House Bill 13-1032, newly-elected Rep. Steven Humphrey introduced House Bill 13-1033–a no-apologies ban on abortions, with no exceptions of any kind for victims of rape or incest.

The bill prohibits abortion and makes any violation a class 3 felony. The following are exceptions to the prohibition:

A licensed physician performs a medical procedure designed or intended to prevent the death of a pregnant mother, if the physician makes reasonable medical efforts under the circumstances to preserve both the life of the mother and the life of her unborn child in a manner consistent with conventional medical practice;

A licensed physician provides medical treatment to the mother that results in the accidental or unintentional injury or death to the unborn child.

Teachers and public employees: Republican morale-building measures for public employees include Rep. Kevin Priola’s House Bill 13-1040 to slash public employee retirement benefits, and freshman Sen. Vicki Marble’s Senate Bill 13-017 to bust teacher’s unions. Meanwhile, the honor of carrying this year’s right-to-work (known to opponents as “work for less”) bill falls to freshman Sen. Owen Hill, who brings us Senate Bill 13-024. Sen. Hill could have made more edits to the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council’s (ALEC) sample “Right to Work” bill–which Sen. Hill’s legislation is rather obviously cribbed from. But we guess he was busy.

These are just a few bills that caught our eye as they were introduced–no doubt there are more. Again, we have little doubt that every bill you see above will die in an Assembly now fully controlled by Democrats. In terms of individual legislators, particularly those representing safe red districts, these kinds of bills probably don’t hurt the reputations of their sponsors.

As for the brand of the party they all belong to…that’s really the problem here, isn’t it?

Comments

18 thoughts on “You Only Get Five Bills, So Why Not Waste Them?

    1. It’s possible the post was edited after you promoted it, which with newer accounts does seem to remove the post from the homepage. Please repromote the post.

  1. They blame sub-par teachers for education woes yet propose making teaching less rewarding in terms of salary and benefits while also being keen on adding new responsibilities such as becoming weapons trained security personnel.

    This makes as much sense as their militant devotion to zygotes coupled with their “tough luck” attitude toward children who have actually been born but who have exercised poor judgement by choosing (?) to be born to parents struggling financially or to undocumented workers or just into one of the less desirable (by their standards) demographics.

    Apparently they believe that the secret to attracting high quality professionals to teaching is to treat them with contempt and make it a job offering more onerous duties with fewer financial advantages and that responsibility for one’s choices, like personhood, should  begin at conception.

    1. What I can’t figure out is how a cookie cutter republican, a regular, working stiff, middle class, average joe type pinko hasn’t figured out exactly what you just posted.

      How can 32% of the public be so damned willfully uninformed, when the very future of their own kids is put at hazzard by the very political hacks these dipshits support?  

  2. definitely not that our legislators are only allowed five bills . . .

    Couple that with the fact that these idiot bills are required to have at least one committee hearing . . .

    The problem is (as is clearly evidenced here) that every legislator is permitted (and consequently expected to have) five bills to begin with.  Without this prime-mover stupidity, a lot of this subsequent legislative stupidity would be greatly curtailed, if not eliminated all together.

    Want further proof? — list five good ideas that Greg Brophy has had in his entire life . . .  

    1. The only idea that Brophy did good on was to not ask me questions when I testified on bills before the committees he was on.

      Other than that, you need to ask someone who cares about him if he ever had any other good ideas.

    1. The legislature and Governor are Dems.  For gubernatorial in our state he has to tack toward center, not right. Has he pretty much concluded he’s just going for rightie celeb in the future, like Tancredo?

  3. The Republicans are concerned with Democratic overreach this session and this is their legislative agenda?

    These sort of dangerous proposals makes me thankful that I know they have no chance of ever getting past a committee in either chamber. I would very worried if the Democrats did not hold the majority.

    And these people don’t understand how they ended up in the minority. Well, it’s a mystery.

    Thankfully the citizens of Colorado have more sense.

  4. Jared ‘Graft’ Wright is sponsoring a bill to ‘arm teachers’ and to allow businessowners to shoot unpleasant patrons.

    Ray ‘API’ Scott is introducing legislation to give tax breaks to Big Oil and Gas for more drilling contrary to what the (formerly beloved) Free Market would otherwise bear.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

59 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!