President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 18, 2023 05:09 PM UTC

Why 9News Downplayed Video of Boebert Groping Her Beetlejuice Date

  • 11 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman

(Behind the scenes of #Beetlebert — Promoted by Colorado Pols)

One of Colorado’s biggest political stories of the year, if not the biggest, is Congresswoman Lauren Boebert’s wild behavior in September during a performance of Beetlejuice at the Buell Theater in Denver.

We know the details — and can see them for ourselves — thanks to 9News, which obtained security footage of Boebert from the Denver Center for the Performing Arts (DCPA) of Boebert at the Buell that evening.

But in its breaking story revealing the Beetlejuice video, 9News didn’t feature the segment of the security footage that would later be seen by much of America: the portion where Boebert and her date enjoy some serious groping.

Instead, 9News zoomed in on a segment of video showing that — contradicting her claim that she didn’t vape in the theater — Boebert took a big hit on a vape pipe during the performance, drawing a complaint from a pregnant woman behind her.

“The DCPA says she was vaping. Boebert’s team denies that, said the haze was from fog machines in the show. That claim goes up in smoke when you see the video,” reported 9News’ Kyle Clark during the Sept. 14 piece, showing a video that zooms in on Boebert vaping and blowing out the smoke in the theater.

Clark’s piece contains a portion of the groping scene, but it’s not enlarged — like the vaping video was — and it flashes by so quickly that you can’t tell that Boebert’s date has his hand on the Congresswoman’s dress on top of her breast. And it completely omits the part when Boebert grabs her date’s crotch.

Clark narrates the breast section with, “Boebert occasionally took a break from being disruptive to enjoy the company of her male companion,” continued Clark on air. “He briefly had a grasp on the situation, before ushers returned and told Boebert she had to leave.”

I’ve been wondering why 9News didn’t highlight (enlarged so you could better see it) the explosive groping segment of the DCPA video.

So I asked Clark why he didn’t do more with it — enlarging it or describing it in more detail – like he did the vaping segment.

Clark

“Our political reporter Marshall Zelinger obtained the DCPA security video for the purpose of determining whether the DCPA or Rep Boebert was telling the truth about the vaping,” Clark told me via a direct message of X, formerly known as Twitter. “Either way, it was newsworthy. Either a public institution was falsely smearing a public official, or Rep Boebert had lied. That’s why we focused on the issues of vaping and truthfulness in our report. I didn’t enlarge or examine other portions of the video. Other observers could certainly criticize that choice. I mentioned that Rep Boebert’s companion was getting handsy because it was too obvious to ignore. It didn’t occur to me to enlarge and examine the video of her companion’s nether regions to determine if the Congresswoman was performing an act of public service in the theater.”

When I saw the enlarged groping segment for the first time, I said to myself that I wouldn’t have posted it on the Colorado Times Recorder site. It felt like it was too much, that it went too far. Lots of people grope in the “darkness” of a theater; I have. Boebert deserved some baseline of privacy.

Boebert

In retrospect, after watching the Beetlejuice saga unfold, I came around to thinking that I would publish a personal video of Boebert, taken in similar circumstances if I had the chance. Boebert shined the spotlight on herself — and so why hide the details? She danced, vaped, sang, groped, and disrupted her way into getting kicked out of the theater and having the police called. The groping segment of the video just filled out the picture and deserved to be spotlighted and enlarged along with the rest of the footage.

But 9News didn’t hide the video of the groping. The TV station published it on its website, where it was available for enterprising viewers to see.

It appears to have been first found and pushed out beyond the 9News website by ProgressNow Political Director Alan Franklin, who also hesitated before posting a GIF of the grope on his personal Twitter account, where it subsequently was viewed over 5 million times and spread across the planet.

Even Franklin, a well-known progressive activist who works for a progressive group, said he had “some trepidation about posting it because of the salaciousness of it.”

“So, I’m pretty tolerant of people getting their thing on,” he wrote on X when he posted the video Sept. 15. “But there were kids all over this theater. I’m sorry. This is conduct unbecoming.”

But Franklin doesn’t fault 9News for burying the segment, saying “9News just releasing it was enough.”

“If I hadn’t done it, someone else would have found it,” he says.

Comments

11 thoughts on “Why 9News Downplayed Video of Boebert Groping Her Beetlejuice Date

  1. My questions are, why wasn’t the vape pen confiscated? What was she vaping, could it have contributed to her behavior? In Colorado pot is legal was it pot? If you are a Federal Employee as a US Representative is, the use of pot is illegal and you can lose your benefits. Are US Representatives and Senators subject to random drug testing? If not why not? If they are, why wasn’t she tested? It is detectable for up to 30 days after using it.

      1. For a regular person it’s no problem. For Federal employees it is.

        Under federal law, marijuana is still classified as a controlled substance. That means, even where laws around marijuana usage have relaxed at the state level, federal law still prohibits its uses in most instances. It would be up to the DEA.

         

        Here’s the link

        https://www.fs.usda.gov/inside-fs/leadership/federal-employees-and-marijuana-use-what-you-need-know#:~:text=Under federal law, marijuana is,its uses in most instances.

        Be informed.

    1. Can you show me some empirical data indicating the efficacy of serum THC testing? Requiring anyone to take a THC UA is a phony, law enforcement mechanism. An amount of THC that a long term user would scarcely notice, will leave a new or occasional user shit-faced.

      Don't, by any means, attribute Boeberts' behavior to vaping THC. Her behavior is driven by a personality disorder. I find her repulsive in practically every way, but THC consumption isn't responsible..

      1. The question he asked was: did officials follow the same procedure for Boebert (confiscate the pen) that they would for ordinary people, and if not why not? Also, do federal investigators have cause to follow-up?

        I am not sure what procedure is actually followed, but that was the question asked.  I do know that if law enforcement is summoned to escort someone from a facility like that who has been ejected, they have a range of options as to what comes next.  For example, did they allow the couple to get into a vehicle and drive away?  Did they consider investigating her for public consumption of marijuana?

        Personally, I think she may have been consuming a nicotine product.  It’s not hard to imagine she has a nicotine problem.   Also, obviously, federal Marshals are not going to start going around blood testing members of Congress for controlled substance use. (That’s only for little people).

        But in any case, the question is not unreasonable.

        1. Re-read the first three questions Leroy asked. There are 5 questions (six question marks) altogether. The last two clearly indicate a concern that she wasn’t tested for Cannabis.

          Sure..there is a legitimate question about how authorities handled it. No argument there. Leroy asked, “What was she vaping? Could it have contributed to her behavior?” Then he immediately mentions Cannabis…My response was to this question, and it’s an inappropriate suggestion that toking up might cause the sordid behavior  now witnessed by millions.

          Perhaps we should be more specific, and not talk past one another.

  2. there is a problem with the media in this nation…the legacy media has aligned with the extremists in the republican cult…and 9 News is no different…republicans are the enemy of our country…

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

141 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!