UPDATE: 9NEWS’ Kyle Clark notes the obvious problem::
Republican State Rep. Richard Holtorf, a candidate for Colorado’s 4th Congressional District, disclosed Friday that he financed an abortion for one of two girlfriends he impregnated, saying it helped her “live her best life.”
Holtorf, who represents the Eastern Plains, made the comment while discussing a resolution by Democrats marking the landmark Roe v. Wade decision that established the right to an abortion…
Holtorf did not appear to recognize the disconnect between his statement lauding the benefits of abortion access for his pregnant girlfriend and his staunch opposition to abortion rights, which led him to call abortion rights supporters “godless heathens” last year.
—–
This morning, the Colorado House of Representatives passed a joint resolution commemorating what would be the upcoming anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision that for many decades guaranteed nationwide access to abortion care. Debate in the Senate yesterday over this resolution was relatively low-key, with only a single Republican speaking against the measure.
But in the House GOP micro-minority, the “caucus discipline” didn’t last. It started with all Republican members present taking the floor together behind Rep. Brandi Bradley to read what was supposed to have been the caucus’ full and, had events transpired as hoped, disciplined statement lodging their opposition to abortion rights and support for Roe’s downfall in the record. But even this attempt at “restraint” managed to put aspiring congressman “Gabbin'” Gabe Evans directly in the line of fire:
Roe and the cases that stem from it represent a national disgrace, not a point of pride. Many years from now, most of us in this room will be long forgotten. But should any of us attain to such prominence as to endure, and should that record cause future generations to actually recall what we have today to say, I want them to understand without any question that I share no part in applauding Roe nor any part in the efforts here today to praise it.
Let me say it plainly: I do not stand with those that stand with Roe. This should be a day of mourning, not rejoicing. Finally, it should be crystal clear to all of us that life begins at conception. There is no excuse. And because of the loss of my daughter, Emerson Riley, in my womb, I will never stand by quietly while this is promoted. Politicians are shamefully good at remarking or remaking otherwise reprehensible things into okay-sounding initiatives. This should not be one.
The larger debate is not about reproductive health. It is about abortion. It is about taking the life and health of a child. And it is wrong…
Earlier this week on KOA talk radio, Evans tried to toe a more liberal line on abortion rights than the statement he signed on to above, trotting out the familiar “personally pro-life but…” stance that so many other vulnerable Colorado Republicans have tried and failed:
Well, I’m pro-life, first and foremost, you know, and I think the pro-life movement has been working for the last 50 years to have this issue, you know, overturned and referred back to the states. We saw that happen. And so I think that right now it’s up to the state of Colorado to figure out how they are best going to, um, protect life, uh, protect women that are in difficult circumstances and protect unborn babies.
As anyone who hasn’t been living in a cave with no electricity for the past fifteen years, Colorado has repeatedly voted in statewide ballot measures to protect abortion rights in overwhelming numbers. Colorado voters have also watched Republican candidates promise that their “personal” anti-abortion positions somehow won’t be reflected in their policies in office, only for Sen. Cory Gardner to fulfill the worst fears of his opponents. Evans’ evasive answer is right out of Gardner’s playbook, but it won’t work again any more than it worked for GOP Senate loser Joe O’Dea in 2022.
But then, despite this choreographed attempt to limit the collateral damage from a protracted debate in the House over abortion rights, another House member aspiring to a seat in Congress, Rep. Richard Holtorf, knocked this debate into next week with a shocking admission that not only did he pay for a girlfriend’s abortion as a randy youth, but that abortion appears to have had…positive consequences?!
I also believe in women’s rights. I have five daughters. So it’s extremely complex. So let’s talk about the next part of this little story. When I was in college I had a girlfriend and she was a beautiful young woman. And we had the unfortunate experience of her getting pregnant. I’m Catholic, so you know my position on life. But I had to respect her rights. Because she said she didn’t want to keep her baby. And that’s hard. That’s hard for a man who respects women. But I respected her rights. And actually gave her money to help her through her important critical time so she could live her best life. [Pols emphasis]
We can’t imagine Holtorf meant to do it, but folks, what we have here is a Planned Parenthood testimonial. This is a Republican representative admitting that he paid for an abortion so a woman he had impregnated could “live her best life.” It’s an admission of such sweeping importance to the issue Holtorf was ostensibly speaking out against that it momentarily boggles the mind. It could be the end of Holtorf’s higher political aspirations, but it’s the most unintentionally honest thing we’ve ever heard a “pro-life” Republican say about abortion.
Just like it did last election after the Supreme Court ripped the scab off the issue, abortion is emerging in 2024 as the stumbling block Republicans still can’t get past. Holtorf just proved again why politicians like Gabe Evans can’t get away with evasive bullshit answers.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: MarsBird
IN: It’s Long Past Time to Ban Body Armor
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Holy Crap Boebert Bestie Matt Gaetz’s Ethics Report Is Bad
BY: The realist
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: coloradosane
IN: Holy Crap Boebert Bestie Matt Gaetz’s Ethics Report Is Bad
BY: coloradosane
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: MartinMark
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: coloradosane
IN: Aurora: Still Not Overrun by Venezuelans (feat. Dave Perry)
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: MartinMark
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I never thought I'd ever say this, but, yay Holtorf!
OH! The Hypocrisy! It Burns.
"OH! The Hypocrisy! It Burns."
No it doesn't.
Hypocrisy presupposes that the hypocrite has some capacity to feel shame or embarrassment. When was the last time anyone in the POT (Party of Trump) displayed any capacity to feel shame or embarassment?
I attended the session as part of the HD9 day pulled together by Rep.Sirota. After the reading of the Whereas clauses and the Resolution, there were a series of speeches.
The weakest line of argument — the Republican caucus statement saying that the Assembly ought to be spending time on important issues [insert a common Republican list here] instead of abortion. If time is of the essence, why are they using it to make a statement on something they KNEW was going to pass by a partisan majority vote? And, by the way, the resolution was the only business of the chamber, as committee work would be taking up the rest of the day.
The best, in my opinion, was from Rep.deGruy Kennedy — talking of how his wife and he faced a variety of medical events of their pregnancies. See his speech here. He was appreciative of the immediate medical care — in one case, he mentioned they had to deal with a drop in blood pressure and "2 liters of blood in her abdomen."
Eventually, Holtorf spoke. You can watch the Holtorf speech on YouTube I was surprised that he chose to cover two premarital pregnancies … one abortion, one open adoption… and mention his other daughters. Seems like a FINE argument for choice, to me. [leaving aside issues of just what sort of Catholic he might be and that at least two women chose to live their lives without him].
I love it when these so-called pro-life politicians occasionally mess up and answer a question honestly instead of parroting the party line talking points.
I remember Dan Quayle once being interviewed and asked what he would do if his then-teenage daughter were pregnant and wanted to end the pregnancy. He went on about holding a family meeting, having a discussion of options and making a decision. It left open the possibility of terminating the pregnancy.
The next day, Marilyn Quayle weighed in and said, "She would carry the pregnancy to term. Period."