CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

50%↑

15%

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Dave Williams

60%↑

40%↓

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 28, 2024 12:06 PM UTC

So, Uh, How About that Presidential Debate!

  • 18 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

If you’re reading these words there is a strong chance you are the sort of person who watched the first Presidential debate of 2024 on Thursday evening.

If you watched that debate, you saw what everyone else saw: President Biden looked pretty bad. Biden’s performance was a shock to the system for many folks who were expecting something…not so terrible. But in any situation, multiple things can be true at once, and it’s absolutely accurate to say that Donald Trump was brutally bad as well (albeit for different reasons).

We’re not here to sugarcoat Biden’s debate performance, but as Pennsylvania Democratic Senator John Fetterman noted on ‘X’ today, it’s important to back up and zoom out a little further. Lost in much of the post-debate discussion about the fact that Biden is an old man — which is not exactly a new revelation — was that Trump sounded like a raving lunatic on Thursday. Let’s dig in a little deeper beyond the obvious problems for Biden, which (again) we aren’t disputing.

Donald Trump Just Makes Things Up

The Washington Post ran a gazillion-word debate fact-check that pointed out the complete absurdity of many of Trump’s claims. Here are just a couple of the more notable falsehoods from Thursday…

On immigration:

“I’d love to ask him why he allowed millions of people to come in here from prisons, jails and mental institutions to come into our country and destroy our country.”

—Trump

This is poppycock. [Pols emphasis] Immigration experts know of no effort by other countries to empty their prisons and mental institutions. As someone who came to prominence in the late ’70s and early ’80s, Trump appears to be channeling Cuban leader Fidel Castro’s 1980 Mariel boatlift. About 125,000 Cubans were allowed to flee to the United States in 1,700 boats — but there was a backlash when it was discovered that hundreds of refugees had been released from jails and mental health facilities.

Helen Fair, research associate at the Institute for Crime & Justice Policy Research in Britain, which tracks the world prison population (except for a handful of countries), says the numbers keep growing. In 2013, 10.2 million people were in prison globally — and that had grown to 10.77 million in 2021. A preliminary estimate for February 2024, not ready to be published, indicates the population has grown even more. “In short, I would disagree with Donald Trump’s assertion,” she said.

Trump’s record on slowing illegal immigration is also nothing close to what he claims:

“We had the safest border in history in that final couple of months of my presidency.”

—Trump

This is false. [Pols emphasis] Trump’s efforts to completely shut the border did not bear fruit until the coronavirus pandemic emerged in 2020 and he was able to turn away migrants by citing a public health emergency — but even then apprehensions at the southern border were lower than April 2017, shortly after he took office. Then the numbers began to spike again. Apprehensions in Trump’s final two months in office were much higher than in President Barack Obama’s last two months in office. Apprehensions were 43,251 in December 2016 and 31,576 in January 2017, the last two months of the Obama presidency, compared with 71,141 and 75,316 in Trump’s last two months. The highest number of apprehensions under Obama was 67,342, in March 2009.

Trump repeatedly talked about how illegal immigrations were marauding around the country raping and murdering Americans in massive numbers. His math is…not so good.

“It could be 18, it could be 19 and even 20 million people.”

—Trump

Trump never met a number that he could not double, triple or quadruple. Here, he manages to take a real number — about 5 million migrants arriving during Biden’s presidency — and increase it fourfold. Then he offers a prediction to make it sound even larger.

Here’s the reality: Customs and Border Protection recorded about 9.5 million “encounters” between February 2021, after Biden took office, through April. But that does not mean all those people entered the country illegally. Some people were “encountered” numerous times as they tried to enter the country — and others (more than 4 million of the total) were expelled, mostly because of covid-related rules that have since ended.

CBP has released more than 3.2 million migrants into the United States at the southern border under the Biden administration through April, the Department of Homeland Security said.

On Medicare and Social Security (and immigration):

“He’s destroying Medicare because all of these people are coming in. They’re putting them on Medicare. They’re putting them on Social Security. They’re going to destroy Social Security. This man is going to single-handedly destroy Social Security.”

—Trump

Undocumented immigrants improve the health of Social Security and Medicare by paying payroll taxes without receiving benefits.

In a fact check, we calculated the figure for Social Security payments made by undocumented immigrants is now about $27 billion. For Medicare, it should be at least $6 billion, as the Medicare tax is about 23 percent of the Social Security tax.

On the overturning of Roe v. Wade:

“Fifty-one years ago, you had Roe v. Wade and everybody wanted to get it [the power to legislate on abortion] back to the states. Everybody without exception, Democrats, Republicans, liberals, conservatives, everybody wanted it back. Religious leaders. … Every legal scholar throughout the world, the most respected, wanted it brought back to the States.”

—Trump

This is absurd. [Pols emphasis] The docket for Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the case in which the right to abortion was overturned, is filled with briefs from legal scholars saying it would be a mistake to overturn decades of legal precedent.

Trump also repeated a favorite Republican talking point that has long been dismissed by fact-checkers: That women are getting lots of abortions at the end of their term and even after giving birth. Killing a baby after birth would be covered by existing laws outlawing murder. Late-term abortions are also exceedingly rare, as the Post points out.

On Veterans:

“There was a made-up quote, suckers and losers. They made it up. It was in a third-rate magazine that’s failing like many of these magazines. He made that up. He put it in commercials. We’ve notified him. We had 19 people that said, I didn’t say it.”

—Trump

Trump strongly disputes this, but elements have been corroborated…

…In 2023, John F. Kelly, Trump’s White House chief of staff in 2018 — who had previously not commented on the controversy — issued a statement to CNN that Trump “rants that our most precious heroes who gave their lives in America’s defense are ‘losers’ and wouldn’t visit their graves in France.”

Absent a recording, there’s no way to definitively confirm the story. Trump references 19 people who denied it — he used to say 25 — but when we examined their statements, 11 were not even with Trump and most of the others were just his communications staff. [Pols emphasis]

On taxes:

“He wants to raise everybody’s taxes by four times.”

—Trump

This is false. [Pols emphasis] For five years, Biden has been consistent in saying he will not raise taxes on people making less than $400,000 a year, which leaves about the top 2 percent of taxpayers. Biden reiterated this pledge in the budget plan he released earlier this year.

Trump also made a number of patently silly claims, such as suggesting that Biden is a “Manchurian Candidate” controlled by China and that the United States had the cleanest air and water ever during his administration. And then there was this historic quote:

We’re not naive enough to believe that Trump’s lies won’t be accepted and/or repeated by his supporters, but those aren’t the people whose votes are actually up for grabs in November anyway. Trump’s bullshit will only grow from here, and eventually average voters are going to have to make a determination about whether they can believe anything that comes out of the mouth of the Big Orange Guy.

 

The 2024 Campaign is Really Just Getting Started

This is the other key takeaway from our vantage point. Thursday’s debate was the earliest in a calendar year that we’ve ever had a Presidential debate between presumptive party nominees. There are a lot of other key points to consider:

What happens when voters start to understand more about “Project 2025,” the not-so-secretive plan to remake America into a Christian Nationalist country under a new Trump administration? The average voter isn’t aware yet that Trump supporters — backed by real money — are doing things like making lists of federal employees deemed insufficiently loyal to Trump. That’s fucking creepy, and it’s going to come up more than once.

There’s also an important question to consider about campaign operations. And as Bill Scher wrote for Washington Monthly last week, the Trump campaign’s GOTV plan for the fall is “bonkers”:

We are in an era of nail-biter presidential elections. In 2020, Joe Biden won three states by less than a percentage point, including Wisconsin, the state that notched him an Electoral College victory. In 2016, that exact statement applied to Donald Trump. Polls today suggest 2024 will be similarly close. The get-out-the-vote operations, the so-called “ground game,” may determine the outcome in November.

This is why it’s bonkers that the Trump campaign has outsourced its ground game to far-right operators with no track record of success.

CNN reported that “Donald Trump’s campaign is taking a vastly different approach to 2024 compared with 2020, with plans for fewer staff and expenses [and instead] relying on wealthy conservative groups for data, infrastructure, and significant bank accounts.” It further noted that one of the most important of these groups is Turning Point Action, part of the Turning Point network that began with Turning Point USA.

Turning Point USA is a right-wing student group founded in 2012 by Charlie Kirk, an 18-year-old soon-to-be college dropout, and Bill Montgomery, an elderly Tea Party activist.

Turning Point USA essentially took over the GOTV operations for the Arizona Republican Party in 2022 (Arizona is Turning Point’s original home), and the results were…not good. Turning Point focused its efforts on three races — U.S. Senate, Governor, and Secretary of State. Democrats won all three races. 

 

 

Thursday’s debate was definitely a bad moment for Biden and Democrats, and nobody should pretend otherwise. But it wasn’t a strong couple of hours for Trump, either.

Perhaps Democrats will figure out a way to replace Biden at the top of the ticket. Perhaps Biden will go on to prove that Thursday’s debate was an aberration and that he is not the man he appeared to be on stage in Atlanta.

We still haven’t seen the reaction from voters once Trump is sentenced on July 11 for his felony convictions in New York. We don’t know who Trump will choose as a running mate after suggesting last week that all would be revealed on Thursday.

We still have a long way to go until November. Any emotional reactions from Thursday’s debate don’t mean a whole lot, particularly considering that it will be persuadable voters in a handful of counties in only six states who will ultimately choose our next President.

A better performance from Biden on Thursday might have cemented his place in front of a lying, babbling Trump, but instead we carry on with uncertainty on all levels. In that regard, nothing really changed at all.

Comments

18 thoughts on “So, Uh, How About that Presidential Debate!

  1. Todd Graham is an outstanding debate coach, used repeatedly by CNN to provide an informed judgment on political debates.  His take is I’m a champion debate coach. Here’s how they scored

    In a presidential debate, I’m expecting to leave the event with more knowledge about future policymaking than when the debate began. In the first 2024 presidential debate in Atlanta on Thursday night, the performances of President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump failed to live up to that expectation….

    Overall Trump grade: F

    You simply can’t lie in debates as often as Trump does if the activity is to be taken seriously.

    Overall Biden grade: F

    Playing into stereotypes and criticisms, Biden had a worse night than Trump. But neither would get my vote based on this debate.

     

      1. It's worse than that, David. The casual voter WANTS to be lied to. That is the secret to Trump's success. As a former business con man he knows people are aching to be told what they want to hear.

  2. Here’s what I’m struggling with. Put aside that Trump would be horrific for the country for a couple of paragraphs. My concern is – is Biden able to campaign effectively for the next 4 months. And if he wins, is he able to govern competently for the next 4 years.

    In the debate he came across as fumbling and feeble and lost. Now I’ll still take that over Trump any day of the week. But I don’t think 53% of the voters will. If the Biden campaign can’t prove that last night was a one-off and Biden is still more than capable of another 4 years – we lose.

    And disproving that will require putting Biden into a lot of Town Halls or equivilent where he would have to think fast on his feet and provide clear answers. If he can do that, nad does do that – great. But if he can’t do that, I don’t see a route to him winning.

    I pray (and I’m agnostic) that the Democratic leadership is thinking this all through and gets Biden to do whatever gives us the best chance of winning in November.

  3. I’m old enough to remember the Obama debate at DU when he absolutley bombed.  I doubt either one of them changed a single mind of anyone already in their camp.  Lots of pearl cluthching today (although Biden did a bang-up job in North Carolina this morning). Count backwards from 100 and follow Newsom’s advice: “worry less, do more”.  I feel like we’re deep into Season 4 of The Boys.  We’ve got a democracy to save and I’m still going to vote for the guy who didn’t try to have his VP killed. 

    1. I think people need to understand the dynamic that happened on the stage last night. Biden was overprepared and Trump took advantage by flooding the zone with too much input, putting his opponent in the position of trying to cover too much in the allotted time. It is easy to get confused if everything to which you must reply is not true.

      Apparently they didn't see this coming and the President was unprepared to select only one lie at a time to which he should respond.

      I am more convinced than ever that Biden is up to the task. Trump is a Traitor, but not the immediate threat. The Supreme Court is about to engage in wrecking decades of civilized growth in order to advance the Heritage Foundations' dream of a Christian autocracy, governed by a Supreme Court of Christian kleptocrats.

      Vote Blue!! No Matter Who!!

      1. I'm puzzled that Biden could have been both over-prepared and under-prepared, but that's not the problem. His possible neurological freeze is the problem. Go back and watch the video from the first ten minutes or so of the debate, which is as long as viewers who are not political junkies will watch. Biden was slack-jawed, his mouth hung open and has no change of expression on his face. When it was his turn to speak, he looked at what presumably were his notes, and struggled to speak. That's what the great unwashed saw, and will see for months in replays all over the internet.

        I don't know how that can be corrected. Bombing in a debate is nothing new, but appearing to be frozen in time is new. I don't know what the answer is other than appearing frequently at unscripted town halls and live interviews wirthout a tteleprompter. I don't know if that would be enough.

         

        1. "That's what the great unwashed saw, and will see for months in replays all over the internet."

          It's actually worse than that because the great unwashed masses have been prepared for those first 10 minutes of Thursday night's event by the media constantly covering the general public's concerns about Biden's age and cognitive abilities for the past year or more.

          All the first 10 minutes of the event on Thursday did was to confirm what many were already thinking.

          1. The great unwashed is one thing, but it's the chattering class I'm more worried about. The instant experts sent out billions of little digital brain farts, then the overcaffeinated wonky wannabes shared or retweeted them another billion times, then the NYT decided it better hop on the Biden-out Bandwagon. Suddenly the other candidate's adult lifetime of lawsuits and lechery and legal problems are swept from the news cycle, and algorithms will keep it that way for a while.

            1. I saw a poll that said 63% of some group they asked said Trump "won" the debate. ?????

              How do you win a debate when every fucking thing you say is a lie? What the hell is wrong with people who think that? 

              1. "How do you win a debate when every fucking thing you say is a lie?"

                That's easy. By telling people who are not what you would call "critical thinkers" (and in some cases, not thinkers at all) exactly what they want to hear.

                You co-sign their bullshit and they'll love you. He knows that and he knows how to do it.

        2. RE your puzzlement. The President was overprepared with data and facts, but apparently not quite so prepared for a recognition of the scenario and an understanding of how to handle it. Whether the employment of the  "Gish gallop" was a conscious decision, or just Donald being Donald,…it worked.

          Biden looked bad. Trump is a lying Traitor.

          You pick.

           

           

          1. "Biden looked bad. Trump is a lying Traitor."

            Both are true statements. But unfortunately for the unwashed masses, perception becomes reality and the fact that Biden looked bad is more important that the shit flying out of Trump's piehole. 

  4. It's likely Biden was acutely impacted by his studder and the high emotion of confronting a thug. Most people might studder when confronted with very high stress. Studders can be bound-up in the same situations. Later in the debate and the day after the debate, his verbal performance were typical.

     

    Neiman Reports ISSAC J. BAILEY

    Is Biden’s Stutter Being Mistaken for “Cognitive Decline”?

    Biden’s verbal stumbles may be explained not by cognitive problems but by his lifelong battle with stuttering. Journalists should provide that context

    I can’t say with any certainty whether Joe Biden, the current front-runner for the Democratic nomination for president, is in “cognitive decline,” as many journalists and critics have begun to ponder aloud. I can say with certainty that what you are seeing of Biden during debates and on the stump can plausibly be explained by his lifelong battle with stuttering. I also know why it is easy for anyone to point to a few clips of Biden to make a seemingly compelling yet misleading case that his verbal stumbles are really about cognitive problems.

    Biden has spoken openly about his stutter, which he’s struggled with since childhood, only occasionally. Words beginning with “s” were particularly difficult when he was growing up, Biden told The Atlantic’s John Hendrickson, who also stutters. Biden wrote a letter for National Stuttering Awareness week in 2015 for the National Stuttering Foundation and mentors young people who struggle with their speech. Journalists who don’t know this history or don’t take the time to understand the complexity of the speech disorder will likely inadvertently mislead their audiences during any discussion about Biden’s mental capabilities.

    If you only knew me from a short local TV news piece done about 25 years ago in the Greenville, S.C. area, you’d believe the severe stutter I’ve dealt with for most of my life—which I spoke about at Nieman’s 80th anniversary gathering in 2018—had been magically cured by something called the “SpeechEasy.”

  5. If this continues, we will have the worst turnout for a presidential election in our lifetimes.  No one shows up except the most hardcore on the respective sides.  But abysmal numbers for youth and minority voting, for sure.  People don't show up for bad choices.  Now, discuss what results come from record-low turnout.

  6. Anyone can have an off night, and the President did, but Yammie-pie is going to push too hard on the “cognitive decline” narrative. He just can’t not. Biden has plenty of time to prove that that’s all it was; a bad night. Biden needs to hammer the facts that the jackass is only two years behind him, that he’s made his own gaffes, that he’s a convicted criminal, and that Project 2025 is a real thing. I’m pretty sure that a strong majority of the nation does not want the latter. 

     

  7. Maybe it won't be as bad as it looks right now ….

    I'm thinking of two historical antecedents.

    In 2016, in the days following the Access Hollywood interview release, a number of Republicans talked of replacing Trump as the GOP candidate. It went nowhere because (a) there was no way to force him to step aside, and (b) there was no way he would voluntarily step aside. They accepted what they could not change, prepared for a Clinton presidency, and worked on holding their majorities in Congress. And to their surprise, Trump pulled off a win.

    Maybe something will happen between now and October to change the dynamics in a good way for the Dems and Biden can pull out a win. And maybe we put more effort into taking back the House which of the three (presidency, House, Senate) is the most likely to go blue. 

    The other piece of history is 1968 when a Democratic incumbent president was pressured to step aside. (I know, that was due to one of his policies and not his physical stamina.) The party factured into different factions. Johnson annointed his VEEP as his successor and the masses literally rebeled. And six years of Richard Nixon was the end result.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

72 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!