U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 24, 2024 11:43 AM UTC

Colorado Republicans On The Run, Meet Under A Literal Bridge

  • 5 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

 

9NEWS’ Marshall Zelinger provides the latest updates in the micro-saga we’ve been watching unfold within the Colorado Republican Party under historically controversial chairman Dave “Let’s Go Brandon” Williams, for whom the knives are out after Williams’ audacious gambit of turning the state party into a personal political vehicle for himself and favored Republican primary candidates collapsed in a heap on June 25th. A petition submitted by Williams’ critics in the party intended to force a vote on his continuing chairmanship was declared invalid, and a meeting in Brighton set up by those critics for the vote was similarly declared by Williams’ allies in party leadership to be “illegal.”

As for the need for some kind of meeting to satisfy the requirement for one without putting Williams’ job in danger? As Zelinger reports, that’s where Williams’ allies in party leadership got creative:

[T]he submission of the petition started a clock that required a meeting to be held within a certain amount of time. That is why Vice Chair Hope Scheppelman called a meeting for July 19 at a park in far southwest Colorado in Bayfield, where she lives.

When the party deemed the petition invalid, the executive committee supported canceling the July 19 meeting. Yet, it still happened. For four minutes and 40 seconds, the Colorado GOP held a meeting on a bike path, under a bridge in Bayfield. But first, they had to get out of the way of a maintenance truck using the trail…

The meeting served its purpose, to fulfill a timeline set by a petition to try to oust the chairman that has already been deemed insufficient. Watkins has called his own party meeting for Sunday at a church in Brighton. The Colorado GOP sued Watkins in Arapahoe County court to prevent a meeting “fraudulently conducted as ‘official business.’”

If you’ve ever driven to Durango in the southwest corner of the state, you may have driven by the town of Bayfield on U.S. 160. Bayfield is almost six hours from Denver, and although it’s a scenic trip it’s one of the longer drives you can take from the metro area and still be in the state of Colorado. Obviously, if you want to hold a meeting that no one attends, it’s about as perfect a location as can be had in terms of distance from where most people in Colorado live.

But that’s the state of today’s Colorado Republican Party: on the run from its own members, and using every trick in the book to stave off the vote on Williams’ future until Labor Day Weekend. By that time, Williams’ allies will no doubt argue that it’s too late to change leadership before the November election, and hope that anger has cooled enough for Williams to survive the vote by the central committee. Williams is also hoping that his legally dubious reimbursements to the party for funds spent supporting Williams in the CO-05 Republican primary, which the party can’t call reimbursements without opening the party to further liability, will ease tensions.

And no matter how the vote ultimately goes on August 31st, it’s that much more time for Williams to get paid.

While the Colorado Republican Party is preoccupied with the internal conflict over Dave Williams’ future, the November election is rapidly approaching, and there’s no sign that we can see of the party doing the bread-and-butter organizing that must happen if Republicans want to chip away at Democratic dominance in the Colorado General Assembly and local races. Meanwhile, Democrats are hard at work on their coordinated statewide campaign to support their candidates at all levels.

That’s a recipe for Republicans to lose across the state in November as bigly as Dave Williams lost his race last month.

Comments

5 thoughts on “Colorado Republicans On The Run, Meet Under A Literal Bridge

  1. In the month of June, mostly BEFORE it was known that the Colorado GOP’s endorsed 18 would produce only 4 primary winners, the financial condition of the organization began another dive.

    (b) Cash on hand at Beginning of Reporting Period …..$549,473.19

    (c) Total Receipts (from line 19)……………………………………………..$108,140.32

    (d) Subtotal ……………………………………………………………………………………….$657,613.51 7

    Total Disbursements ……………………………………………………………………..$129,595.92

    8. Cash on Hand at Close of Reporting Period ………………..$528,017.59

    With ongoing infighting, the report for July’s finances will be even more interesting to read.

    REPUBLICANS 'R' REVOLTING

    1. In many by-laws, a quorum is assumed UNLESS someone challenges it  Have a called meeting that few can get to, a quick gavel in, no one challenges, actions are taken, and the meeting is adjourned. 

      It can be "legal" and according to the by-laws, just not fair or small d- democratic.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

78 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!