President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 31, 2024 11:53 AM UTC

Abortion Rights: What "Leave it Up to the States" Really Means

  • 1 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

The issue of abortion rights has been a real problem for Republicans since the June 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade that removed federal protections for the procedure. Since that decision, voters in every state that have had an opportunity to vote on the issue — including beet-red states such as Kansas — have overwhelmingly sided in favor of preserving abortion rights for women.

This fact has not been lost on Republican politicians who are trying to thread the needle with their anti-choice base while not appearing to be unelectable for everyone else. Polling has shown that one-third of American voters will only support a politician who shares their views on abortion rights, which is why Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump has gone out of his way to publicly proclaim that the issue “should be left to the states” and should not include a nationwide ban on the procedure.

A few months after the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, we noted in this space that there was no longer room for “nuance” on the subject of abortion rights. You either support the right of women to make their own reproductive health decisions, or you don’t. It’s a “Yes or No” question, though many Republicans are still trying to find a third answer. Those who used to dodge this question by saying something like, ‘Abortion rights are settled law in this country/state,’ are now defaulting to the line that abortion rights should be left up to the states.

But “leaving it to the states” leads to some pretty awful results.

As The Associated Press reports:

Iowa’s strict abortion law went into effect Monday, immediately prohibiting most abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, before many women know they are pregnant. [Pols emphasis]

Iowa’s Republican leaders have been seeking the law for years and gained momentum after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. The Iowa Supreme Court also issued a ruling that year saying there was no constitutional right to abortion in the state.

“There is no right more sacred than life,” Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds said in June. “I’m glad that the Iowa Supreme Court has upheld the will of the people of Iowa.”

Now, across the country, four states ban abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, and 14 states have near-total bans at all stages of pregnancy. [Pols emphasis]

Of course, this doesn’t mean that women in Iowa are foregoing abortion care altogether. For those with the means to do so, they are now traveling to other states (including Colorado) in order to get the care that they desperately need. Here’s how abortion rights now look across the country, via the Guttmacher Institute:

 

Republican Gabe Evans

Here in Colorado, Republican Gabe-ish Evans is using a similar line in his campaign against incumbent Democratic Rep. Yadira Caraveo in CO-08. This is what Evans says about abortion rights on his campaign website:

When my wife was about 24 weeks pregnant with our second son, the doctor told us he was likely incompatible with life (praise God, he’s now seven and loves puppies). Since then, my wife has had eight miscarriages. We’ve seen the heartbeat at six weeks, and mourned the loss of a child at nine weeks.

I am pro-life, believe abortion stops a beating heart, and oppose taxpayer funded abortion. Since the US Supreme Court has returned this issue to the states, I will not vote for a national abortion ban. Coloradans must determine how to best protect women and babies’ lives. [Pols emphasis] I will support legislation like H.R. 7, which affirms that taxpayer dollars cannot be used to fund abortion.

That’s the official vetted version of Evans’s position on abortion rights, which is as confusing as lady parts are to Evans in general (more on that in a moment). Does this mean that Evans actually supports abortion rights in Colorado — which will likely be enshrined in the State Constitution after the November election? Of course not — and his votes as a State Representative confirm as much. When Evans says, “leave it to the states,” what’s he’s really saying is, ‘it’s okay to gut abortion rights wherever possible.’

In fact, when Evans starts to expand his talking points on abortion rights, it becomes immediately clear that “leave it to the states” is not a line he takes all that seriously. Here he is doing an interview with right-wing “reporter” Sherrie Peif a few weeks ago:

EVANS: Again, I’m not a woman. I know the difference between a man and a woman.

PEIF: You’re not a ‘birthing parent’?

EVANS: Yeah…no. So there’s a lot of just like, that, you know, like I know enough, but there’s a lot of nuances to that female reproductive care stuff that my wife is sitting there trying to explain to me about how this stuff all works together. And I…you know…there’s a lot of doctors that she goes to that I don’t go to. I don’t got the right parts. [Pols emphasis]

PEIF: Right.

EVANS: She’s trying to explain to me, like, what happens at these doctor’s visits, and at a certain point I’m like, ‘I’m just going to have to take your word for it.’ Because, to me that’s what’s most important — is that we figure out, how do we best protect life. And life…there’s a lot of complexity to it. Particularly when you get down to the realm of eight miscarriages and figuring out, ‘Okay, how do I protect life in this particular situation? How do I protect life in that particular situation?’

Donald Trump and the head of Gabe Evans

“I don’t got the right parts.” If only that meant that Evans would thus recuse himself from voting on issues related to reproductive care for women.

The ‘leave it up to the states’ answer also leaves the door open to a bunch of other questions. What would Evans do under a potential Trump administration that prohibits interstate movement for health care services? What would he say to a crackdown on telehealth and the distribution of abortion drugs such as mifepristone (which now account for 63% of all abortions nationwide)? How would Evans react to conservative state lawmakers and activists who are using shady tactics to keep abortion rights off the ballot in red states?

And despite what he says about opposing a national abortion ban, would Evans really vote no on such a proposal if Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson brought a vote to the floor with a promise from Trump to sign the legislation?

The bottom line here is simple: Saying that we should ‘leave abortion rights decisions up to the states’ is just a long-winded way of affirming that you oppose abortion rights in general. Again…you either support the right of women to make their own reproductive health decisions — regardless of which state they call home — or you don’t.

There is no third answer.

Comments

One thought on “Abortion Rights: What “Leave it Up to the States” Really Means

  1. Eight miscarriages. May we assume that all of them were complete and that his wife didn’t need a D&C or other “cleanup” procedures afterward? What he so eagerly wants to vote on could leave women like his wife sitting in a parking lot waiting to lose enough blood to qualify for surgery to complete the process. 

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

101 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!