President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 09, 2024 12:34 AM UTC

Friday Open Thread

  • 5 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

“Seeming to do is not doing.”

–Thomas A. Edison

Comments

5 thoughts on “Friday Open Thread

  1. Conservative Affirmative Action. H/T Brad DeLong

    the author complains that the underrepresentation of conservatives in academia (relative to the American population) is an indication of liberal bias. Apparently creationists, climate denialists, vaccine “sceptics” etc deserve some affirmative action

    1. That was the rationale for hiring John Eastman at CU Boulder: "ideological diversity". So while Eastman was on the Colorado tax and tuition-payers' dime, he was plotting the overthrow of a democratic election. 

      The Jake jabs and Leeds school of business folks love that " affirmative action".

      1. State support to CU Boulder is fairly minimal, so you are referring to nickels and dimes almost literally.

        The Institute that brought Eastman to campus is in large part supported by tax-deductible donations, not direct funding of state revenue.

    1. AIPAC is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Its funding falls under US law barring foreign sources of money, and the donations can be researched on the Open Secrets website.

      Where do you see the PAC as getting money from "a foreign power" Israel? Rolling Stone, your link, says specifically "A significant portion of funding for the organization comes from wealthy Republicans and Trump donors."

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

166 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!