U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 16, 2024 11:36 AM UTC

Two Republicans Launch Silly "2nd Amendment Caucus" for Reasons They Can't Articulate

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: An eagle-eyed reader pointed out that the statue featured prominently in the “Second Amendment Caucus” logo is no longer in that spot in front of the State Capitol.

That statue, which depicted a Civil War soldier who was part of the First Colorado Cavalry unit that took part in the infamous “Sand Creek Massacre,” was toppled by protestors in 2020 and is being replaced by a sculpture of a Native American woman mourning the atrocities of the Sand Creek Massacre.

In other words, including this image was no accident.

—–
Republicans in the micro-minority in the State House of Representatives don’t have the ability to do much of anything besides waste everyone’s time speaking about inane nonsense and engage in performative obstruction efforts. Them’s the breaks when you have just 19 members in a 64-member legislative chamber.

Republican Reps. Ryan Armagost (left) and Scott Bottoms playing with their manhood.

But rather than trying to come up with ideas that might interest actual Colorado voters, House GOP leaders are instead forming an even smaller mini caucus!  State Reps. Scott “There is No” Bottoms (R-Colorado Springs) and Ryan Armagost (R-Larimer County) announced this week that they are starting a “Second Amendment Caucus” to promote the right to wield any gun for any reason at any time.

As Melissa Henry reports for KKTV in Colorado Springs:

Following the last legislative session when democrats introduced a group of gun bills, two state republican representatives are standing up what they call a “Second Amendment Caucus.”

A caucus is a group of lawmakers who get together to discuss topics often prompting legislation, although caucuses do not have any direct lawmaking power.

Rep. Scott Bottoms, a republican representing El Paso County, says a main goal of the new caucus is to educate both lawmakers and citizens on firearms after hearing arguments and testimony at the state capitol last session on gun legislation.

“We heard things that, it was so obvious that these people have never touched a firearm … They don’t know what different rifles do, and to even use the term ‘assault weapon’ shows us they don’t understand what a firearm is … We are just trying to get some more information out there and try to help people a little more comfortably discuss, understand and debate the subject,” Bottoms said. [Pols emphasis]

Yeah, THAT’S your problem — people just don’t understand all the different names for firearms. It’s definitely not that Coloradans are definitely more supportive of gun violence prevention measures than allowing people to play their own private version of “cops and robbers.”

Bottoms and Armagost are apparently the only current members of this new club; it didn’t occur to them to maybe invite other people before making their announcement. Both men say that they hope their “Second Amendment Caucus” will be a bipartisan group, though no Democrat in their right mind would want to join an organization that included these twits (Bottoms, BTW, also just joined a new Republican-led effort to fight scary LGBTQ people).

Bottoms may not have done a great job of explaining the point of this new club to KKTV, but he at least formed sentences better than Armagost — a man who has demonstrated time and time again that using words is not his strong suit. Armagost took time out this week from collecting gun-themed clothing in order to talk with Jeff Hunt on KNUS radio about why the House of Representatives needs a new gun club. It went poorly, despite Armagost’s enthusiasm:

 

HUNT: Do you think [an assault weapons ban] is something we’re going to see again [next] year? Are you trying to pre-empt…are you trying to get your caucus members ready for another Second Amendment battle down at the State Capitol?

ARMAGOST [Shown here in his gun-themed wardrobe]: I think…yes. And the other part of that, I’d say, from another angle, is to also bring more voices to the table, uh, so if we do have a committee, we can have meetings. We can bring a new voice to the table — those business owners. The survivors of…of…gun violence, you know. Anything like that, that can talk to people and say, you know, tell their story. ‘If I had a firearm,’ or ‘my firearm saved my life,’ or whatever the case may be…getting that, that information to people so that they can kind of see that, ‘Oh, there’s another perspective that I didn’t think about.’ Because we have to hear the other perspective all the time, on the Republican side and on the pro-Second Amendment side.

We just need more people on the anti-gun, and the anti-Second Amendment side to kind of see other perspectives and other points of view, and get informed and educated. So that’s the primary purpose. Hopefully it can be pre-emptive, but if nothing else, it can be something where we can at least sustain that mentality and that ideology and make sure everyone’s on the same…[pause]…um…uh…the same…you know, group. [Pols emphasis] We’re all in the same mindset knowing what we’re looking at and what we’re approaching.

Armagost believes that people would be very supportive of allowing guns everywhere if only they knew the stories of imaginary business owners who survived gun violence despite not having their own firearm. He’s almost on the right track. The truth is that Coloradans have heard lots of stories about gun violence, which is why Democrats passed a bunch of gun violence prevention (GVP) bills in the 2024 legislative session.

That Armagost and Bottoms are spending time on forming a new “caucus” when ballots drop in Colorado in two months tells you a lot about why there are only 19 Republicans in the State House of Representatives.

And where in the hell is House Minority Leader Rose Pugliese? Her name showed up in support of the GOP’s latest anti-LGBTQ effort this week; is she just going to let her craziest members do whatever they want? We know Pugliese won’t actually stand up to anyone in her caucus, but perhaps she could at least try to point them in a more useful direction.

It’s almost like Colorado Republicans aren’t even trying anymore.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Two Republicans Launch Silly “2nd Amendment Caucus” for Reasons They Can’t Articulate

  1. More guns=more deaths.  That is the statistical reality in the US.  No matter how they try to paint it, guns kill people.  Lots of people.  

  2. So…who is going to lead the GOP? Is the Republican party to be the Oligarch party? It has been behind the curtain until now. The bullshit with Mrs. Adelson should be the last straw, but won't be. Can we write off the GOP as a political party bent on sedition and treason? 

    How many more times can Trump slap the American constitution in the face before we toss the motherfucker aside? C'mon, America, let's remember who we are.

     

     

     

      1. I thought 4 election cycles would be enough, and that after Trump successfully leading to a minority of the popular vote in 2016, Congressional losses in 2018, a loss in 2020, an underperformance in 2022, they wouldn't think of him as the future of the Republican Party.

        So, I'll be giving up on prognostication, particularly when it comes to the reformulated "Republicans."

        1. I can’t help seeing marionettes whenever I consider this Circus. The people behind the insurrection are only now being discovered. The American Oligarchs are ascendant as long as Republicans have any ability to affect legislation in their usual fashion. A complete annihilation at the polls and a mandate and message are needed.The message for Musk, Bezos, and the Billionaire Human Haters club is.

          .you have bled us dry…

          You have been planning on abandoning us all along. Now is the time..get on your spaceship and go. Or maybe, we can arrange a ride for you on Boeings’next flight.

           

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

137 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!